[newcastlefan]

I was born in 1991 and i remember everything

[Benji]

me too...

[Sarah.]

I was born in 91, they bring back lots of memories, a lot of them apply to me!

[Captain.Remy]

It was old good time, when young people were passionated and had some awesome hobbies like Pokemon and stuff, where we were all innocent. Nowadays young people are bored really quickly, our societies change, it's sad for them.

[:)tom:)]

i was 94 but i remember loads of the stuff up there.

[cepb]

Originally posted by tom
i was 94 but i remember loads of the stuff up there.

Awwww, you're a likl baby then...

[Matt08]

I was born in 1992.

[Sam!]

I remember all of that and im 14 so it should be under 14 lol or even younger

[cepb]

Originally posted by Funky Sam
I remember all of that and Im 14 so it should be under 14 lol or even younger

Yes but 1996 was probably your first memory of the 90s. So that's over half the decade gone.

[Scarlett.]

The 90's well and truly rocked!

[Matt08]

Originally posted by Chewy
The 90's well and truly rocked!

2000's are better though.

[Sam!]

Originally posted by cepb

Yes but 1996 was probably your first memory of the 90s. So that's over half the decade gone.

Still remember all of the things lol

[Scarlett.]

Originally posted by Matthew

2000's are better though.

You must be joking the 2000's suck!

[Matt08]

Originally posted by Chewy

You must be joking the 2000's suck!

Fashion is alot better and we have more gadgets and better technology. Definately better.

[cepb]

Originally posted by Funky Sam

Still remember all of the things lol

Well you didn't watch Playdays when you were small cuz it finished in 1995.

[Scarlett.]

Originally posted by Matthew

Fashion is alot better and we have more gadgets and better technology. Definately better.

Camera's are everywhere, Terrorism is rife, War is raging, and our phonecalls are about to be monitored, not better

[Bells]

I consider myself to be a 90s child. And it was such a great time to grow up in - not that I'm biased or anything, but I wouldn't change a thing. My brother was born in 2002, and I still think that he sponges off most of the stuff the 90s kids got first.

[Retroman]

It's all well and good claiming you remember things...
But if you were born in 1990 - 1994 for example, and certain books/tv shows/crazes/events happened between 1990-1994 then you WEREN'T there. Or you were TOO YOUNG to remember.

You just witnessed the aftermath, or the repeats of the tv show etc.

I could have been born in 2000, but still remember all of these things if I watched specific channels/downloads.

So yea, coming along several years into the 90's and claiming you remember everything doesn't make you a 90's child. Because you weren't there when half of the things actually happened, like I said..you just saw the aftermath/repeats/ whatever happened after 1994 or whichever year.

It's the equivalent of coming along in the year 3000 and saying you're a 90's child because you remember all the things from the 90's because you researched them/watched them on tele/online. You still weren't there.

Being there for half of it, or even three quarters of it...isn't quite good enough in my opinion. Some of you would have been 5-9 years old when the year 2000 came around, so your childhood went well into the 2000's =]

By logic, id say that makes most of the people here either 2000 children, or half 90's children at best.

[Scarlett.]

Stop being selfish I am a 90's child coz I can rerember everything WHEN it was happening

[cepb]

Originally posted by Retroman
It's all well and good claiming you remember things...
But if you were born in 1990 - 1994 for example, and certain books/tv shows/crazes/events happened between 1990-1994 then you WEREN'T there. Or you were TOO YOUNG to remember.

You just witnessed the aftermath, or the repeats of the tv show etc.

I could have been born in 2000, but still remember all of these things if I watched specific channels/downloads.

So yea, coming along several years into the 90's and claiming you remember everything doesn't make you a 90's child. Because you weren't there when half of the things actually happened, like I said..you just saw the aftermath/repeats/ whatever happened after 1994 or whichever year.

It's the equivalent of coming along in the year 3000 and saying you're a 90's child because you remember all the things from the 90's because you researched them/watched them on tele/online. You still weren't there.

Being there for half of it, or even three quarters of it...isn't quite good enough in my opinion. Some of you would have been 5-9 years old when the year 2000 came around, so your childhood went well into the 2000's =]

By logic, id say that makes most of the people here either 2000 children, or half 90's children at best.

Agreed.

My earliest memory of the 90's is 1991. Would you consider me to be a child of the 90's?

[Retroman]

Originally posted by cepb
Agreed.

My earliest memory of the 90's is 1991. Would you consider me to be a child of the 90's?

Well I think we have to go off percentages here...
If you remember everything from 1990 - 2000 then you'd be 100% a 90's child.

And you knock 10% off for each year you don't remember.

So I guess that would make you 90% a 90's child =]

Anyone who's 50% or under isn't worth noting.
Those who are 60% - 80% have a decent knowledge, but aren't quite worthy of being a full on 90's child.

90% or above I think would be a good reflection of a 90's child.
Most things going on in 1990 would have still been going on in 1991 anyway.

[Scarlett.]

I can rerember from 1992 so that would make me 80%

[cepb]

Originally posted by Retroman

Well I think we have to go off percentages here...
If you remember everything from 1990 - 2000 then you'd be 100% a 90's child.

And you knock 10% off for each year you don't remember.

So I guess that would make you 90% a 90's child =]

Anyone who's 50% or under isn't worth noting.
Those who are 60% - 80% have a decent knowledge, but aren't quite worthy of being a full on 90's child.

90% or above I think would be a good reflection of a 90's child.
Most things going on in 1990 would have still been going on in 1991 anyway.

KK thanks.

So I suppose you are 100% a 90's child and 30% a 80's child.

[Legend]

Originally posted by Retroman

Well I think we have to go off percentages here...
If you remember everything from 1990 - 2000 then you'd be 100% a 90's child.

And you knock 10% off for each year you don't remember.

So I guess that would make you 90% a 90's child =]

Anyone who's 50% or under isn't worth noting.
Those who are 60% - 80% have a decent knowledge, but aren't quite worthy of being a full on 90's child.

90% or above I think would be a good reflection of a 90's child.
Most things going on in 1990 would have still been going on in 1991 anyway.

Are.You.For.Real.?

This was supposed to be a good, funny thread for people to have a laugh at .... and you've turned it into ''you are 30% a 90s child'' ... ahhhh, clearly everyone born in the 90s is a ''90s child'' ... you're an ''80s child'' ... everything doesn't have to be a competition so leave us to remenice (sp?) on pogs and pokemon which btw I loathe.

[Captain.Remy]

It's a funny place so please keep it up ! It's full of great memories here !