[indiemusic]

Originally posted by CathalOS
those dreses ar sooo awful i hope they get a better agent!

What,just because the dresses are "awful"? That isn't exactly the most important quality in an agent imo. For me at least its the ones that get you the most money and the most suited deals.

[Kate..]

Headache!!!! I thought they had such good fasion sence too!

[Sticks]

Originally posted by indiemusic
Plus like i said the camera man managed to get a bit of a revealing shot of under Amandas dress Well doubt the agents going to make them wear that type of dress again if he sees it.

This is a common error many ladies make. Certain fabrics, once hit by a camera flash are not as opaque as they should be, which means if you must wear such fabrics ladies always make sure you are wearing opaque underwear.

As for this shot, technically it would not be that the photographer was being perverted, that is just what happens in those lighting conditions. However the problem came when he decided to publish that shot for what ever reasons, but given that tabloids, such as the Daily Mail, routinely publish such snaps of celebrity females getting caught out it is easy to see why he felt it fair game to go down that route. Why the shot was subsequently removed I am not certain, was he bought off, or was there some legal reason brought to bear.

But let this be a lesson, and I repeat, whenever you are going out in a new dress ladies, make sure it is not the kind that goes see through under the flash gun. However if you must wear it, wear something underneath.

[Sticks]

Just to prove a point about the tabloids

Thinking about this issue again, if the photographer knew about the transloucent properties of the dress fabric, then maybe he was not so innocent if he intended to get the result he did.