[Alf]

Anybody know his full real name?

[Oliver_W]

Spoiler:

Interesting timing!

Originally Posted by Alf

Anybody know his full real name?

Spoiler:

"Dean Smith" might

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Spoiler:

"Dean Smith" might

Is this meant to be clever or threatening?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Spoiler:

Interesting timing!

Spoiler:

"Dean Smith" might

Robinson held a public event in Salford at the weekend to broadcast his preemptive response to the BBC program, live to 3000 mouthbreathers. He has that same program on YT.

Is this really what people consider as "being silenced?"

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Robinson held a public event in Salford at the weekend to broadcast his preemptive response to the BBC program, live to 3000 mouthbreathers. He has that same program on YT.

Is this really what people consider as "being silenced?"

He probably promoted that event on Facebook, can't do that anymore. Why? because he's been silenced.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

He probably promoted that event on Facebook, can't do that anymore. Why? because he's been silenced.

Marcus Garvey organised more than 6 million people, and he died in 1940. I think Robinson should still be able to get his message out. His speech is not prevented, it's just not being given as public a platform (which no one has a right to).

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Alf

He probably promoted that event on Facebook, can't do that anymore. Why? because he's been silenced.

You're being deliberately ignorant now.

[Withano]

Thank ****. Hopefully YouTube will follow suit so we (quite genuinely) will never hear from him again.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Withano

Thank ****. Hopefully YouTube will follow suit so we (quite genuinely) will never hear from him again.

If you was in control and capable of running your own life, then you wouldn't need people to censor other people for you.

It's as simple as just turning him off yourself. You can do it. But remember to defend his freedom at all costs. Because one day, there might be people in positions of power that don't agree with you, and will take away your freedoms, and who will defend you, when you don't want to defend freedom yourself?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Alf

If you was in control and capable of running your own life, then you wouldn't need people to censor other people for you.

It's as simple as just turning him off yourself. You can do it. But remember to defend his freedom at all costs. Because one day, there might be people in positions of power that don't agree with you, and will take away your freedoms, and who will defend you, when you don't want to defend freedom yourself?

But what if you don't want to turn him off...not him imo....but like some real nasty natzi bastards like Hitler. ...what if people don't want to turn it off...


Only group atm, Imo, that are anything like the nazis is isis..


But I can still watch folk getting butchered on the web.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Alf

If you was in control and capable of running your own life, then you wouldn't need people to censor other people for you.

It's as simple as just turning him off yourself. You can do it. But remember to defend his freedom at all costs. Because one day, there might be people in positions of power that don't agree with you, and will take away your freedoms, and who will defend you, when you don't want to defend freedom yourself?

I dont have control of what other people put on their social media, hence I still see his face and the ****-tonne of hate messages that come alongside of it about. Its not quite as simple as ‘turning him off’....

Gonna be more pleasant without him and if YouTube follow suit, it will be virtually impossibile to ever see him. This is a good thing for everybody (apart from Tommy but maybe he can concentrate on getting an actual job instead now).

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Spoiler:

Interesting timing!

Spoiler:

"Dean Smith" might

Conspiracy theories just obscure the very simple truth. BBC has no power over facebook and vice versa, the idea that facebook might be retaliating against a BBC 'expose' that has no worldwide impact is fairly ridiculous. That Twitter user is reaching to absolve that prick of his own blame.

Originally Posted by Alf

If you was in control and capable of running your own life, then you wouldn't need people to censor other people for you.

It's as simple as just turning him off yourself. You can do it. But remember to defend his freedom at all costs. Because one day, there might be people in positions of power that don't agree with you, and will take away your freedoms, and who will defend you, when you don't want to defend freedom yourself?

You keep saying censorship, why? We've already established it's not censorship and you can pretend it isn't by ignoring the facts. He has not been censored, he has never been censored, neither or his fans understand the concept of censorship.

Peoople are allowed a negative opinion on him, free speech after all.

Also stop trying to make out that he's been targetted, he got warned multiple times and he still insisted on breaking the rules that he agreed to follow. He's not a martyr, he's not innocent, he's a prick that can't follow basic rules and nothing more. He only has himself to blame.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Conspiracy theories just obscure the very simple truth. BBC has no power over facebook and vice versa, the idea that facebook might be retaliating against a BBC 'expose' that has no worldwide impact is fairly ridiculous. That Twitter user is reaching to absolve that prick of his own blame.



You keep saying censorship, why? We've already established it's not censorship and you can pretend it isn't by ignoring the facts. He has not been censored, he has never been censored, neither or his fans understand the concept of censorship.

Peoople are allowed a negative opinion on him, free speech after all.

Also stop trying to make out that he's been targetted, he got warned multiple times and he still insisted on breaking the rules that he agreed to follow. He's not a martyr, he's not innocent, he's a prick that can't follow basic rules and nothing more. He only has himself to blame.

It doesn't matter how many times you say it's not, I'm telling you it's 100% censorship.

And I'm gonna say that he didn't even post any of these comments, because if he had, they'd be available to see. It's more likely that some other person posted them in his comments section, if they were posted at all.

I'm happy to be proved wrong, if you can.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Alf

It doesn't matter how many times you say it's not, I'm telling you it's 100% censorship.

And I'm gonna say that he didn't even post any of these comments, because if he had, they'd be available to see. It's more likely that some other person posted them in his comments section, if they were posted at all.

I'm happy to be proved wrong, if you can.

I've proved that the very idea of calling it censorship is plain wrong, you just believe that if you don't acknowledge that, then it's not true. You'll do the same for anything anyone provides to prove you wrong because you won't accept anything that goes against your world view no matter how factually true it is.

Facts are facts, this is not censorship.

[Crimson Dynamo]

A lot of hate and anger in this thread

Not nice

[Beso]

I'm expecting another BBC paedo outing soon, smells off deflection to me.

[Matthew.]

Fantastic news that he’s been banned though, at least it’s some sort of barrier to prevent his pish verbal diarrhoea being spouted

And like Underscore said, Katie Hopkins next

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

Fantastic news that he’s been banned though, at least it’s some sort of barrier to prevent his pish verbal diarrhoea being spouted

And like Underscore said, Katie Hopkins next

It's a hit list is it?

Talk about hate. You seem to have a lot.

[Matthew.]

Originally Posted by Alf

It's a hit list is it?

Talk about hate. You seem to have a lot.

I dislike bigoted people, yes

Is that not a normal opinion to have

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

I dislike bigoted people, yes

Is that not a normal opinion to have

Then don't follow their pages, or block/mute them - it will have the same effect as them being banned, as far as your timeline is concerned.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

I dislike bigoted people, yes

Is that not a normal opinion to have

You can have any opinion you want, and so should Robinson be able to.

Agree with him, disagree with him, debate him, ignore him. But don't censor him.

[reece(:]

There's no place in the world for hate speech and bigotry, it should be stamped out and is rightly being done

[Beso]

Originally Posted by reece(:

There's no place in the world for hate speech and bigotry, it should be stamped out and is rightly being done

It will never be, Tommy Robinson was popular cause he says what many families say around their table at dinner time...that is a fact.

[Matthew.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It will never be, Tommy Robinson was popular cause he says what many families say around their table at dinner time...that is a fact.

If you say those things around your dinner table then that is a little bit concerning tbh

And he’s not popular

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Matthew.

If you say those things around your dinner table then that is a little bit concerning tbh

And he’s not popular

What things?