[arista]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Arista you know how the world works, you scratch my back and il scratch yours.

Yes, but this is getting worse
he helped a Conservative
get richer.
On a failed venture.



Is Prince Charles
the best choice to take over from the Queen?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes, but this is getting worse
he helped a Conservative
get richer.
On a failed venture.



Is Prince Charles
the best choice to take over from the Queen?

He has spent his whole life waiting to be king and he will be king
No one in this world is perfect.

[arista]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He has spent his whole life waiting to be king and he will be king
No one in this world is perfect.

Yes I get that

But I think more Shocking Front Pages
may end that
soon.

[jet]

Unfortunately, the sterling work the Royals do isn’t reported; unlike the few negatives that arise now and then that show they are as human as anybody else.
In truth, they do a hell of a lot more good than they do harm.

In the case of Prince Charles, this is just one of his charitable initiatives:

The Princes Trust.

The Prince's Trust help 11 to 30 year-olds who are unemployed or struggling at school to transform their lives.
Since The Prince of Wales set up The Prince’s Trust in 1976, more than 870,000 disadvantaged young people across the UK have been supported by the Trust and helped to move into work, education or training. www.princes-trust.org.uk

The Prince's Trust International

The Prince's Trust International works to combat the global issue of youth unemployment and focuses on supporting young people overseas. www.princestrustinternational.org

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes I get that

But I think more Shocking Front Pages
may end that
soon.

Nothing will stop him becoming king and il have bet with you on it.

[Beso]

.

[bots]

i wonder how much of the cash ended up in back pockets on the way to the bank

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i wonder how much of the cash ended up in back pockets on the way to the bank

That’s why they should skip Charlie boy ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i wonder how much of the cash ended up in back pockets on the way to the bank

Good Point.

[AnnieK]

The cash thing stinks a bit to me. It was paid into the PWCF but not mentioned in the accounts if I understand that correctly? Seems fishy to me. Sure it happens a lot but any donations should be completely auditable surely? His charity fund also finances his Scottish estate....so where did that money go?

[bots]

people seem to be under the misconception that charities and public figures are averse to sticking their head in the trough

[bots]

money laundering and illicit activity are the usual reasons that cash is used. We all know that, so why are people trying to think up excuses to justify it

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

money laundering and illicit activity are the usual reasons that cash is used. We all know that, so why are people trying to think up excuses to justify it

Because they’re bootlickers, it’s really simple as that

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

money laundering and illicit activity are the usual reasons that cash is used. We all know that, so why are people trying to think up excuses to justify it

Justify what exactly..a charitable gift that just happened to be paid in cash, its a very popular and normal way for the Saudis to do things.

Hows about everyone justifies their unproven and malicious rumour mongering about charles filing his pockets with it...

[jet]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Justify what exactly..a charitable gift that just happened to be paid in cash, its a very popular and normal way for the Saudis to do things.

Hows about everyone justifies their unproven and malicious rumour mongering about charles filing his pockets with it...

Well said Parmy.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by jet

Well said Parmy.

Its right though!

Why should people have to justify what has been said happened byt he people who know and the charities involved.

It should be up to all the gossip mongers to justify their pathetic unfounded claims.

They also need to justify why they are so against a charity receiving this gift.

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Justify what exactly..a charitable gift that just happened to be paid in cash, its a very popular and normal way for the Saudis to do things.

Hows about everyone justifies their unproven and malicious rumour mongering about charles filing his pockets with it...

if charles received the money in an appropriate way there would be no need for an investigation, would there? Its not malicious to want to know the truth

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

if charles received the money in an appropriate way there would be no need for an investigation, would there? Its not malicious to want to know the truth

No, s'pose it's not.



But its malicious to assume him guilty of any wrongdoings, like people have in this thread.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by parmnion

No, s'pose it's not.



But its malicious to assume him guilty of any wrongdoings, like people have in this thread.

Yeah it’s not as though he cheated on Di before and after they were wed .. and it’s not as though his brother isn’t a wrong ‘un

Plus he’s been talking to plants for the last 30 years ...

Why should we doubt him in the slightest ..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Yawn


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

If this was Boris or one of his underlings the media would have Boris in the stocks or calling for his head ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

Originally Posted by Zizu

If this was Boris or one of his underlings the media would have Boris in the stocks or calling for his head ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The media have both Boris and Charles in their sights at the moment. Give them both a break, that's what I say.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

The media have both Boris and Charles in their sights at the moment. Give them both a break, that's what I say.

the media are quite vicious when they find and easy and profitable target aren't they.

[ThomasC]

Couldn't give a toss about any of the 'royals' tbh

[Beso]

Meanwhile at the invictus games.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ms-dealer.html