[andybigbro]

Originally posted by Stu

One vote per one household.

No , Why should we be resticted to how many votes we can make

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by supercharlieb
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru....php?tid=70812


doesn't this shout something out to you?

something isn't right here..

That is Only a TiBB Poll

TiBB IS not the WHOLE UK Public

[Stu]

Originally posted by andybigbro


No , Why should we be resticted to how many votes we can make

Because you just said in your own argument 'people would vote vote vote vote vote vote vote and vote' .

Besides , one vote per person is COMPLETELY fair. Most things are done that way. Its called democracy .

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by Stu

Because you just said in your own argument 'people would vote vote vote vote vote vote vote and vote' .

Besides , one vote per person is COMPLETELY fair. Most things are done that way. Its called democracy .

Yes they would vote vote vote if its was FREE!

but if it has a cost to the votes then it would limit to how much people can vote

After i voted Brian a lot of times my phone dial tone cut out and after the final it worked again

[Stu]

Originally posted by andybigbro

Yes they would vote vote vote if its was FREE!

but if it has a cost to the votes then it would limit to how much people can vote

After i voted Brian a lot of times my phone dial tone cut out and after the final it worked again

You can make the votes free , but restrict it to one vote per household , to get everyone voting , hence the point of this discussion im having with you.

Did you not read my argument?

[supercharlieb]

Originally posted by andybigbro

That is Only a TiBB Poll

TiBB IS not the WHOLE UK Public

I can understamd your a big brian fan....

but doesn't that even raise your eyebrow slightly....

if I made a poll of who likes George Bush....

I reckon after 600 people voting, i'd get the general idea, wouldn't I?

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by Stu

You can make the votes free , but restrict it to one vote per household , to get everyone voting , hence the point of this discussion Im having with you.

Did you not read my argument?

Yes i did but i dont want to be restricted to one vote per household

[Stu]

Originally posted by andybigbro

Yes i did but i dont want to be restricted to one vote per household

Why not? Isint that fair? Its free , so each person has their say , and theirs no obssesive or block voting!

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by Stu

Why not? Isint that fair? Its free , so each person has their say , and theirs no obssesive or block voting!

i just prefer it the other way
which is also fair cause you can vote how much times you want and it up to you to make adecision to how may times yuo vote

[Stu]

Originally posted by andybigbro



i just prefer it the other way
which is also fair cause you can vote how much times you want and it up to you to make adecision to how may times yuo vote

Hows that fair? If someone wants person A. to win he votes once , but a person who wants person B. to win votes a hundred times - its really not an accurate representation of what people think.

[supercharlieb]

its the bookies, not the people that decide

[Stu]

Originally posted by supercharlieb
its the bookies, not the people that decide

Like they decided the twins won?

[guardsman18]

Originally posted by andybigbro
I dont think its afix cause i know toms of people like me who voted LOADS of times round about40 - 50 times

you people must have money to burn. do something useful and send it to me if you don't want it. And yes, i think it was a fix.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by andybigbro



i just prefer it the other way
which is also fair cause you can vote how much times you want and it up to you to make adecision to how may times yuo vote

You are joking. That is not fair it is down right corrupt. The richest voters get to win.

Imagine multiple voting was allowed at a General election...What would result. Chaos......

The only fair and proper representation of popularity is one vote per household.....Never will happen but unless it does no winner of any TV competion show can be sure they are genuine winners......

[Wasted]

There's no fix, but a lot of favouritism on the spin-off shows.

I'm referring particularly to BBLB *coughDermotO'LearyandhisloveforBrianandhisrefusal toallowanyoneontheshowwhohadanopinionagainstBriana ndhisattemptstoforceanyguestwhodidn'tlikeBriantosa ytheywantedhimtowinanywaycough*

I just hope a certain incompetant presenter will try doing a decent job at his show next year and actually be fair to all housemates now that he's got his own way for one series.

[Barbie]

i admit not just because im a Twins fan but it did seem weird that Brian won after the Twins being favourite to win and slightly more popular and then when Brian won with 60% of the vote but he has won now whether it was fair or not
the Twins will go far anyway so let invesigations be done but they wont find anything which changes results