[Samm]

I think Jay is bwoty

[James]

The trouble with people wanting all these banned members unbanned is that the posts they get banned for get deleted, so people never see what they were banned for in the first place.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by James

The trouble with people wanting all these banned members unbanned is that the posts they get banned for get deleted, so people never see what they were banned for in the first place.

Can posts just not be deleted then? And threads closed rather than deleted or cleaned? And just be stricter on people continuing an argument in a thread if they've been told to stop, i.e. rather than deleting the posts with arguing just punishing those who carry on? Just to make things more transparent so people know what really went on

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by James

The trouble with people wanting all these banned members unbanned is that the posts they get banned for get deleted, so people never see what they were banned for in the first place.

Scott was banned for something that happened offsite though :/

[Me. I Am Salman]

PLEASE bring Scott back
no one is opposing it and come on all he did was make a blog

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Salman!

PLEASE bring Scott back
no one is opposing it and come on all he did was make a blog

No, that's not all he did. It's very difficult I agree and despite everything I actually miss Scott's funny ways and our wall chats where we exchanged funny animal gifs a plenty, but he more than crossed a line and if we all got let off the hook for everything there'd be anarchy.

[Kizzy]

I knew it....

[Ninastar]

smithy reply to my text you slut

[Smithy]

my phone is upstairs charging effort

[Ninastar]

Originally Posted by Smithy

my phone is upstairs charging effort

oh right

all i said was that the little knife thrower on BGT looked like you

so dont get your hopes up haha

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..I also think that being told not to ever mention anything on the forum or have anything explained, doesn't actually remove any confused or negative feelings, it just means that people are more likely to voice them privately, which actually is never a good idea because it just often makes those feelings grow and become more negative, like a 'low morale' thing..it's always better to be open with anything that you're not sure about or want to ask...

No matter who gets banned and what the reason is, they always have members that are friends and then more often than not members that don't get on with them so much, so apart from other members bans being nothing at all to do with anyone else it also causes arguments to just let lots of discussion go on about them because all it takes is for one to say I'm glad xxxxxxxx was finally banned and someone else to disagree and it goes from there it's also unfair on the banned member because they are unable to speak up for themselves.

Some members seem to think they have to be involved in everything that's went on and that causes a lot of unnecessary drama too because they start posting comments about things they have no clue about and it never ends well.

Originally Posted by Jack_

Can posts just not be deleted then? And threads closed rather than deleted or cleaned? And just be stricter on people continuing an argument in a thread if they've been told to stop, i.e. rather than deleting the posts with arguing just punishing those who carry on? Just to make things more transparent so people know what really went on

We cant just not delete posts, some of the stuff that gets posted towards members on here can be very offensive and people report posts like that no matter if the thread is closed or not, just because it's been dealt with doesn't make it any less offensive either.

And your comment about being stricter on people just proves we can't win no matter what we do, it takes a lot for us to put members onto a long ban and we don't like doing it, we give out more than enough chances but then when we finally do it we get members moaning anyway.

Another thing is there's certain members on this forum that seem to want drama constantly or be involved in it, they want to know everything that's happened, ask constantly about deleted messages, banned members when they have no need to know at all.


As for Scott's ban, he's not just banned for creating a blog, this has been said before and other members constantly asking for the ban to be lifted won't do him any good, if or when he gets unbanned it will be our decision and not due to other members thinking they need to speak on his behalf.

[Smithy]

did you send if from your new number?

-takes thread off topic-

[Ninastar]

yah i think so, my new but not new number cause its actually temporary one

[Smithy]

bitch

[Ninastar]

hahaha

[Ramsay]

permabans are silly

[Marsh.]

Does his blog still exist? I never got a chance to see it.

[Kizzy]

'Some members seem to think they have to be involved in everything that's went on and that causes a lot of unnecessary drama too because they start posting comments about things they have no clue about and it never ends well.'

Totally this, keeping dragging the same rubbish up at every opportunity... getting really boring.

[Beso]

**** bum poop fanny and cock.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Beso

**** bum poop fanny and cock.

Good old Parmy, just as controversial 11 years on.

[armand.kay]

what did scott do?

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

what did scott do?

Made a burn blog that people submitted bitchy things too

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

what did scott do?

The question is who.

[Redway]

Avocado oil is a godsend (it tastes like conventional vegetable oil when heated up anyway and that’s part of the point) but I *hate* the taste of avocado as it is. That’s my controversial opinion.

[Ramsay]

hahhaah