[arista]

Starmer top of the paper

[arista]

[bots]

that's faked Arista

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by arista

Half of me is hoping that hasn’t been edited


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[arista]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Half of me is hoping that hasn’t been edited

Yes its a remix
he is taking the piss of Labour Leader stance
on what a woman is.



He is British Iranian Comedy fella

[arista]

In PMQ's
Starmer Joked about
Star Wars against the Prime Minister today

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by arista

In PMQ's
Starmer Joked about
Star Wars against the Prime Minister today

I thought he made himself look a proper clown today, he was laughable.

[The Slim Reaper]

The centrist, neolib wet dream





Very serious intellectuals

[arista]

Originally Posted by hijaxers

I thought he made himself look a proper clown today, he was laughable.

They debated Starmer on a Good Panel
on Politics Live BBC2HD

Final one of the week

Tomorrow Friday it is a recording done today.
waste of money.


Grace Blakeley said Starmer
needs to give a better idea of what Labour can offer

[Zizu]

He surely has to resign now ?!

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is being investigated by Parliament’s standards watchdog over potential breaches of rules on earnings and gifts.

According to an update on the website of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Sir Keir is facing a probe under Article 14 of the MPs’ Code of Conduct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

Starmer
was Live in Coventry

at a Labour Gathering

SkyNewsHD


Not on BBC
they prefer a Repeat
Nick Robinson talking...............




He said if he did not take Wandsworth
they would not win General Election.

He said they took Wandswoth

Massive Clapping

[bots]

Labour's shadow foreign secretary David Lammy is under investigation for allegedly breaking rules for declaring financial interests.

The Parliamentary Standards probe is looking at possible breaches to the MPs' code of conduct.

MPs must register changes to their financial interests within 28 days, but Mr Lammy's financial register contained interests recorded after that period.

Mr Lammy apologised and said he had put "revised systems in place".

The investigation was opened on Wednesday by Parliamentary Standards commissioner Kathryn Stone who has been looking at possible breaches in the areas of earnings, gifts and foreign travel.

The MP for Tottenham's financial register included a speech in the US on the invasion of Ukraine.

It also noted he received £3,280 from the Canary Wharf Group for a speech and question-and-answer session on 1 December, but it was not registered until 27 May.

A spokesperson for Mr Lammy said: "David Lammy takes his declaration responsibilities seriously and as soon as this was brought to his attention he wrote to Registrar of Members' Financial Interests to apologise for the administrative errors in his office which led to late declarations in December last year.

"He has assured the registrar that he has put revised systems in place so that declarations are made in a timely manner."

The shadow foreign secretary joins Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer in being investigated by the watchdog.

Sir Keir has previously insisted he was "absolutely confident" he had not broken the rules, and blamed the investigation on "administrative errors" in his office.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-61864936

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Labour's shadow foreign secretary David Lammy is under investigation for allegedly breaking rules for declaring financial interests.

The Parliamentary Standards probe is looking at possible breaches to the MPs' code of conduct.

MPs must register changes to their financial interests within 28 days, but Mr Lammy's financial register contained interests recorded after that period.

Mr Lammy apologised and said he had put "revised systems in place".

The investigation was opened on Wednesday by Parliamentary Standards commissioner Kathryn Stone who has been looking at possible breaches in the areas of earnings, gifts and foreign travel.

The MP for Tottenham's financial register included a speech in the US on the invasion of Ukraine.

It also noted he received £3,280 from the Canary Wharf Group for a speech and question-and-answer session on 1 December, but it was not registered until 27 May.

A spokesperson for Mr Lammy said: "David Lammy takes his declaration responsibilities seriously and as soon as this was brought to his attention he wrote to Registrar of Members' Financial Interests to apologise for the administrative errors in his office which led to late declarations in December last year.

"He has assured the registrar that he has put revised systems in place so that declarations are made in a timely manner."

The shadow foreign secretary joins Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer in being investigated by the watchdog.

Sir Keir has previously insisted he was "absolutely confident" he had not broken the rules, and blamed the investigation on "administrative errors" in his office.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-61864936

Isn’t Starmer also under investigation for the same thing ??




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

To be fair, Lammy always struck as being somewhat principled and honest (for a politician), and also not too bright. I'd believe he didn't purposefully break the rules.

[arista]

Rail strike: Labour MPs at station picket lines

Starmer told them not to................


Live debate on this
on LBC Radio

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61878745

[bots]

Starmer doesn't have any control of his party, thats obvious. He doesn't have a clue about labour policy and his mp's just do as they please

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Starmer doesn't have any control of his party, thats obvious. He doesn't have a clue about labour policy and his mp's just do as they please

The problem, is that everything he supposedly stands for now, is diametrically opposed to what he supposedly stood for when running in the leadership election.

It's not that he doesn't have control over them, it's that no one knows what the party is supposed to stand for any more. If he wants to be a tory-lite party, voters will vote for the real thing 100% of the time.

[bots]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

The problem, is that everything he supposedly stands for now, is diametrically opposed to what he supposedly stood for when running in the leadership election.

It's not that he doesn't have control over them, it's that no one knows what the party is supposed to stand for any more. If he wants to be a tory-lite party, voters will vote for the real thing 100% of the time.

they are fixated on a manifesto, which in the labour party is arrived at by loads of working groups, all with different agendas coming together and arguing it out. When they are not in an election year, they should be able to provide a few headline policies that give everyone a clue what labour stand for, but I don't think Starmer has the power to create such a policy document without it going through 100 different focus groups. That's where I think labours problems *manifest*

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Starmer doesn't have any control of his party, thats obvious. He doesn't have a clue about labour policy and his mp's just do as they please

So stupid of him to say it.


No Wonder the Left Winger 10AM show
made it an item.

He said Labour think if they stand
with strikers,
Labour could then lose the General Election


Starmer appears to be New Labour Style

[Liam-]

It’s very hard for a party to follow the line when the leader has no idea what he stands for himself, the mans a shambles, he conned his way into the leadership position and now he just goes a little off centre whichever way the Tories point

[arista]

Originally Posted by Liam-

It’s very hard for a party to follow the line when the leader has no idea what he stands for himself, the mans a shambles, he conned his way into the leadership position and now he just goes a little off centre whichever way the Tories point

But he wants to be Prime Minister


I would prefer a clear line
so I know they are a real Labour MP etc


I hated New Labour
it was like New Tory

[arista]