[jammyface]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Who's that knobhead on your signature?

Who's that knobhead on your signature?

[iRyan]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Vibes don't count.

What do you mean vibes don't count? That's how I feel and that's my reasons why I don't think he should win. It's my own opinion. So don't be telling me 'vibes don't count'.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by iRyan

What do you mean vibes don't count? That's how I feel and that's my reasons why I don't think he should win. It's my own opinion. So don't be telling me 'vibes don't count'.

But still vibes don't count.

[spindoctor]

Originally Posted by vesavius

Steve will sooner or later try to dominate the house, as he already has tried to do in the house metting where he laid down the law about cleaning up after themsleves.

Trust me, this guy has a dark side, and military 'regimental' (his words) behavour has never gone down well in the house (where most see themselves as on holiday).

He will do ok for the first few weeks, until he is tired, bored, and intolerant of the other younger HMs.

You have summed this chappy up right. Still thinks he is in the army. Complete control freak expect to see some confrontation.

[Mac Hiavellian]

It's still way too early to say that. Based on last night's show I think the Hms aren't actually as OTT as thought. Maybe it was the launch night excitement that got to them. Obviously I still think he was sadly chosen because of his false limbs to make him seem like an abstract character but his personality comes across as a normal, every day guy

[Chuckyegg]

Theres always the possibility he is incredibly irritating without the skills to avoid confrontation and a supporter of some dodgy politics. His carefully constructed appearance certainly puts him in those categories.

[geoking66]

Mojo, the question here is whether or not Steve will end up with a sympathy vote because of his previous experiences and current disability, essentially guaranteeing him a place in the final at the expense of other, and possibly better, housemates. Ideally, the whole of the public would understand that the housemates should be judged on their contributions to the house and whether or not they deserve to stay as a result what they've done whilst housemates. Unfortunately, this isn't necessarily the case and the media (Murdoch, Sun, etc) are pushing him based on being an ex-soldier. To many fans, this is completely unjustified and essentially devalues the entire programme.

In my opinion, Steve hasn't done much and, had today been the final, would not deserve to win. Whether or not he changes over time is to be seen; if he's a good housemate, then he deserves to stay, but if he becomes irritating, abrasive, or otherwise merits eviction, then the public should vote him out. It's unlikely that this will happen because even nominating him is perceived as being either discriminatory or unpatriotic, and such a stunt means that other housemates won't be nominating fairly because they don't want to be evicted. It's also arguable that he shouldn't be in the house due to his disability, as it means possible exemption or specialised status from tasks, which is unfair to the other housemates.

[InOne]

Steve is the typical oldie they always bang in the house. Nothing else.

[JTM45]

He'll be the first one out if he continues to snore like that!

[jammyface]

Originally Posted by geoking66

Mojo, the question here is whether or not Steve will end up with a sympathy vote because of his previous experiences and current disability, essentially guaranteeing him a place in the final at the expense of other, and possibly better, housemates. Ideally, the whole of the public would understand that the housemates should be judged on their contributions to the house and whether or not they deserve to stay as a result what they've done whilst housemates. Unfortunately, this isn't necessarily the case and the media (Murdoch, Sun, etc) are pushing him based on being an ex-soldier. To many fans, this is completely unjustified and essentially devalues the entire programme.

In my opinion, Steve hasn't done much and, had today been the final, would not deserve to win. Whether or not he changes over time is to be seen; if he's a good housemate, then he deserves to stay, but if he becomes irritating, abrasive, or otherwise merits eviction, then the public should vote him out. It's unlikely that this will happen because even nominating him is perceived as being either discriminatory or unpatriotic, and such a stunt means that other housemates won't be nominating fairly because they don't want to be evicted. It's also arguable that he shouldn't be in the house due to his disability, as it means possible exemption or specialised status from tasks, which is unfair to the other housemates.

And i agree fully with your comment.

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by geoking66

Mojo, the question here is whether or not Steve will end up with a sympathy vote because of his previous experiences and current disability, essentially guaranteeing him a place in the final at the expense of other, and possibly better, housemates. Ideally, the whole of the public would understand that the housemates should be judged on their contributions to the house and whether or not they deserve to stay as a result what they've done whilst housemates. Unfortunately, this isn't necessarily the case and the media (Murdoch, Sun, etc) are pushing him based on being an ex-soldier. To many fans, this is completely unjustified and essentially devalues the entire programme.

In my opinion, Steve hasn't done much and, had today been the final, would not deserve to win. Whether or not he changes over time is to be seen; if he's a good housemate, then he deserves to stay, but if he becomes irritating, abrasive, or otherwise merits eviction, then the public should vote him out. It's unlikely that this will happen because even nominating him is perceived as being either discriminatory or unpatriotic, and such a stunt means that other housemates won't be nominating fairly because they don't want to be evicted. It's also arguable that he shouldn't be in the house due to his disability, as it means possible exemption or specialised status from tasks, which is unfair to the other housemates.

well said.

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Thumbs Up Stacy

yeah, he's cool. if he won though, i'd feel like it's just because he's disabled.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by geoking66

Mojo, the question here is whether or not Steve will end up with a sympathy vote because of his previous experiences and current disability, essentially guaranteeing him a place in the final at the expense of other, and possibly better, housemates. Ideally, the whole of the public would understand that the housemates should be judged on their contributions to the house and whether or not they deserve to stay as a result what they've done whilst housemates. Unfortunately, this isn't necessarily the case and the media (Murdoch, Sun, etc) are pushing him based on being an ex-soldier. To many fans, this is completely unjustified and essentially devalues the entire programme.

In my opinion, Steve hasn't done much and, had today been the final, would not deserve to win. Whether or not he changes over time is to be seen; if he's a good housemate, then he deserves to stay, but if he becomes irritating, abrasive, or otherwise merits eviction, then the public should vote him out. It's unlikely that this will happen because even nominating him is perceived as being either discriminatory or unpatriotic, and such a stunt means that other housemates won't be nominating fairly because they don't want to be evicted. It's also arguable that he shouldn't be in the house due to his disability, as it means possible exemption or specialised status from tasks, which is unfair to the other housemates.

No no no. Let's check what you have said about him earlier.

Originally Posted by geoking66

I think it's unfair to say that someone deserves the prize solely because of something they've done in the outside world (especially in an illegal war).

Your hate against him comes from "illegal war", not how he has or gonna act on BB house.

[jammyface]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

No no no. Let's check what you have said about him earlier.



Your hate against him comes from "illegal war", not how he has or gonna act on BB house.

oh god hes back

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by jammyface

oh god hes back

What you gonna do now? Call cops? (after crying to mods)

[jammyface]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

What you gonna do now? Call cops? (after crying to mods)

at least they agree what you said was well out of line.
why dont you try sticking to the topic for a change, or are you that incapable of doing that.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by jammyface

at least they agree what you said was well out of line.
why dont you try sticking to the topic for a change, or are you that incapable of doing that.

Let's see...

Originally Posted by jammyface

oh god hes back

Stick with topic? Piss off scum.

(i can see you pushing that "Alert" button again)

[Tom4784]

I'm not much of a fan at the moment, he's gonna be one that fades into the background I think.

[BB_Eye]

There is something strangely badass about Steven. I think he could go far.

[Zippy]

I have respect for him and all but Im not impressed so far. Although Im all for disabilities being allowed in the house I do think it can create awkward dynamics. Other HMs being afraid to criticize him in case they look mean.

Its not his fault but its a reality. I also think its a bad idea to just have him be the only older HM. Kind of isolates him even more.

Im once again left wondering if this selection has been thought through properly.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

There is something strangely badass about Steven. I think he could go far.

I think he is just a normal guy. They should give him 10 pints of beer, then we can see if he is bad or not.

[jammyface]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Let's see...



Stick with topic? Piss off scum.

(i can see you pushing that "Alert" button again)

why do you have a problem with me.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by jammyface

why do you have a problem with me.

Excuse me? Did i report you? (lol, oh actually i did)

[jammyface]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Excuse me? Did i report you?

i reported you for good reason.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by jammyface

i reported you for good reason.

Good. Now piss off to the govan topics.