[bigmalky]

Originally posted by VickyJ

What do you think they could do about it now though?

I really dont think anything to be honest...the lines are open, and they probably wont get the emails til tomorrow...

If there's enouigh complaints the votes will be registered null until BB finds a way to rectify the situation. People will get the money back for their votes.

I complained this afternoon early when the lines were open so someone should have got it. If there's enough complaints then it should work... thing is people are complaining for the wrong reasons... such as who is up. It's not about who it's about why.

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by NONESHALLPASS
]Lisa was in the first week having a go a real go in freddies face and was almost spitting what she had to say to him.
She should have gone in the first few weeks, marcus joked about the things he would do and never once got into the face of someone thats the difference.
Lisa is and always has been a bitter twisted nasty individual, marcus says things for effect and didnt actually get into anyones face, so I dont get your point really

marcus 'joked' about wanting to knock others out?? oh please. you could say that alexandra was joking about with her threats and just for effect. she was removed just the same. now i cannot stand lisa, but he's been far more aggressive than lisa has ever been. his aggression isn't even limited to one person. everyone is in the firing line with him, including bb. he doesn't need to get into someone's face to be threatening either. i cannot undertand why you choose to not to see his aggressive nature

[offelia]

and we are going to vote freddie out as many times as we can

[fredrica]

Originally posted by offelia
and we are going to vote freddie out as many times as we can

No thanks I won't be doing that.

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by kisywisy

marcus 'joked' about wanting to knock others out?? oh please. you could say that alexandra was joking about with her threats and just for effect. she was removed just the same. now i cannot stand lisa, but he's been far more aggressive than lisa has ever been. his aggression isn't even limited to one person. everyone is in the firing line with him, including bb. he doesn't need to get into someone's face to be threatening either. i cannot undertand why you choose to not to see his aggressive nature

All the Mucus fans have tunnel vision and double standards ,Hes one VERY lucky chappy to still be there after his unreal aggresion

[NONESHALLPASS]

Originally posted by BBmassive

All the Mucus fans have tunnel vision and double standards ,Hes one VERY lucky chappy to still be there after his unreal aggresion

YOu lost this argument remember?? time for a new topic how about will charlie and rodrigo get together how entertaining

[rayheartbliss]

Originally posted by BBmassive

All the Mucus fans have tunnel vision and double standards ,Hes one VERY lucky chappy to still be there after his unreal aggresion

you kno, sometimes..i dont kno why you bother...their just marcus/freddie fans...

its not worth it.

[Tenantry]

You know full well what Chn4 will do with your complaints.

[halfacrown]

If you want to complain then go ahead, I have. Why people are complaing about other people complaining is beyond me.

[bigmalky]

Originally posted by halfacrown
If you want to complain then go ahead, I have. Why people are complaing about other people complaining is beyond me.

We brits will complain about anything

[neonlight]

Originally posted by VickyJ

we know this, but if they were consistant with their punishments, then somehow bea and sophie would also be up.

Yes, Bea and Sophie should also be up.

[lime]

Didn't BB call all HM to the living room on Monday and announce that as numerous HM's continue to break the rule of discussing nominations,all HM were now free to discuss previous ,present & future nominations.

Was not this the punishment for discussing nom's ?

I do not like Bea or Sophie ,but I do not see how they should be up also.

All HM were free to discuss and they did.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by lime
Didn't BB call all HM to the living room on Monday and announce that as numerous HM's continue to break the rule of discussing nominations,all HM were now free to discuss previous ,present & future nominations.

Was not this the punishment for discussing nom's ?

I do not like Bea or Sophie ,but I do not see how they should be up also.

All HM were free to discuss and they did.

They broke the rules before the rule was changed.

It was changed to protect them

Any clearer now?

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by Cybele
On another thread it was mentioned that there is a rumor that BB is now going to show them all of the footage of previous nominations along with commentary by BB like:

Charlie, yesterday at 3:00 you told Rodrigo that you had never voted for him. But here is footage which shows that to be untrue.

(obviously made up information but you get the point). I hope this is true!! The actual rumor is on the thread entitled You Guys Were Right that was started by me.

What is this "made up information" garbage. Charlie told Rodrigo explicitly that he had voted for him once. This is NOT made up information. See the difference?

[lime]

Originally posted by VickyJ

They broke the rules before the rule was changed.

It was changed to protect them

Any clearer now?

Yes I know they broke the rule before the rule was changed,
That's the whole point....They changed the rule BECAUSE HM's were discussing nominations.

[h33]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run
What is this "made up information" garbage.

I think if you read Cybele's comment again, what was meant by the above was "for example" and using the term "made up infromation" was to clarify it as such.

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by VickyJ

They broke the rules before the rule was changed.

It was changed to protect them

Any clearer now?

They changed the rule as a punishment. Sophie said she wanted to be up against Marcus and asked HMs to nominate her so that she could demonstrate to Marcus that she was more popular than he is in a public vote.

The punishment denies her that opportunity and is therefore a valid punishment.

Any clearer now?

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run

They changed the rule as a punishment. Sophie said she wanted to be up against Marcus and asked HMs to nominate her so that she could demonstrate to Marcus that she was more popular than he is in a public vote.

The punishment denies her that opportunity and is therefore a valid punishment.

Any clearer now?

Well no it didnt deny her the oppurtunity to be against marcus. If she had been serious she could well have told them all to nom her. She was speaking out of her ass, as usual.

[bigmalky]

Well, personally, I think C4 word things the way they see fit... Here's my reply from C4 about the fixing and my reply to them.


Dear Mr Graham,

Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding BIG BROTHER.

We are sorry to hear you are disappointed that Marcus and Freddie are up for eviction and feel this is because Big Brother changed the rules. Please be assured that your comments have been logged and noted for the information of those responsible for our programming.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.

Regards,

Penny Watson
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries

And mine...

Dear Ms Watson,

I do not think that the point is that Marcus and Freddie are up for eviction. I feel it is the point, that others who broke rules about nominations were bypassed by the particular rule change as it was obvious that both of the other housemates would be chosen by the rest of the house. In past weeks, BB has decided to let others like Siavash, Sophie and Kris do silly tasks like trying not to talk or swear and also a coupole of weeks ago everyone was put up for eviction... again unfairly as it should have been vote to evict, not to save which pushed another deserving housemate from the show due to lack of support.

This shows blatant game fixing and again feels like the production team of the show are stealing the decision from the viewers to get rid of who they want out. I have already made a complaint to Ofcom regarding the bullying in the house of previous weeks from certain housemates and also because of last night's incident between Bea and Freddie. Bullying should be viewed as negative and punished appropriately, not rewarded by getting to the final of a gameshow, yet the show seems to condone this along with George Lamb who laughed at the obvious taking apart of Freddie on BBLB yesterday afternoon. I find the housemates involved, namely Lisa, Bea, Charlie, Sophie and David have escaped punishment for far too long and we are losing the genuinely entertaining housemates who actually make people want to watch.

Thank you,

Paul Graham

[WOMBAI]

Originally posted by BBmassive

WHAT ?"Like a wild animal ?" Get a grip ffs

The only one in there acting in any way like a wild animal is Marcus! People have such conveniently short memories - you just have to laugh at the total hypocrisy of it all!!

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by h33

I think if you read Cybele's comment again, what was meant by the above was "for example" and using the term "made up infromation" was to clarify it as such.

Thank you for your help. Clearly I read Cybele's comment. What I meant was that he could have substituted cyphers rather than names. His post hopes that readers will take inference from the """" example """"" he cooses to use.

At 3.00 p.m A told B that he/she had never nominated B but in week x, the fllowing was the actual nomination and a clip showing A nominating B is shown, would have been a less subversive post.

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by VickyJ

Well no it didnt deny her the oppurtunity to be against marcus. If she had been serious she could well have told them all to nom her. She was speaking out of her ass, as usual.

Yes dear.

[Shasown]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run

Thank you for your help. Clearly I read Cybele's comment. What I meant was that he could have substituted cyphers rather than names. His post hopes that readers will take inference from the """" example """"" he cooses to use.

At 3.00 p.m A told B that he/she had never nominated B but in week x, the fllowing was the actual nomination and a clip showing A nominating B is shown, would have been a less subversive post.

Cybeles post made sense to me.

Clearly you did not read it properly

Cybele being a female name sort of indicates the poster would be a "she"

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run

Yes dear.

So, she seriously wanted to go up against marcus then?

Yes this was very clear

If she wanted to she would have told them to nom her, as it happened she didnt dare face marcus.

So I think the patronising is for you. Not me

[yardski]

I dont see what the fuss is all about... BB producers have from day one manipulated the show...

The worse form of manipulate have been during the past few weeks with 2 ex boyfriends going into the house..

The Vote to save .. well we all knew Hira would be off then, couldnt see many people spending money on saving her.. not that she was a bad HM, just she didnt have enough support...

and now openly saying talk about nominations.. hours b4 voting began.... hmmmmm

U should all do what i have done... stop voting for anyone..
Vote for .. None of the above.. hit the show in the pocket and then maybe they will get the message...

if u have a not vote campaign .. an profits go down maybe that would be more worthwhile than.. lets all complain to channel 4...

just a suggestion !!!!!!