[Glenn.]

Leeching off the royal connection I see. And look of course she is applauded for doing it. I wonder whyte?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Come on guys this is ridiculous - not one of us would have had a clue who Kate's mum was if we'd passed her on the street before seeing her picture on this thread.

Well I would and I am sure many will agree....why would a magazine put her on their front cover if nobody knew who she was

[GoldHeart]

Kate's mother looks alot like her, but in a different setting I don't think many people would know who she is .

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well I would and I am sure many will agree....why would a magazine put her on their front cover if nobody knew who she was

I know what all the Middletons look like, even Pippa's hubby, who is married to Made In Chelsea Spencer Matthews brother.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Kate's mother looks alot like her, but in a different setting I don't think many people would know who she is .

her mom looks gorgeous

[AnnieK]

I know who she is but without her name next to her photo on there, I wouldn't have known that was her. She's not in the public eye daily so many non Royal watchers wouldn't know her. That's not a bad thing though

I'm not sure why she would want the magazine pulled though, I highly doubt she has said anything disrespectful in the interview.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

I know who she is but without her name next to her photo on there, I wouldn't have known that was her. She's not in the public eye daily so many non Royal watchers wouldn't know her. That's not a bad thing though

I'm not sure why she would want the magazine pulled though, I highly doubt she has said anything disrespectful in the interview.

...(...I’m guessing...)...that because it was always due for the April issue and Philip is in now hospital now, which wouldn’t have been known he would be...she’s asked for a delay...that’s what I’m thinking...not for any content of the article...

[Kazanne]

I don't know what this woman has done to get such venom ,she seems nice enough and very attractive , she also seems to be a woman of morals ,so why not have her on a magazine cover?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Bollocks, only Royal fetishists care enough to take note of such tertiary Royals.

Originally Posted by jet

I know what all the Middletons look like, even Pippa's hubby, who is married to Made In Chelsea Spencer Matthews brother.

[Ammi]

...why is it even a woman on the cover of Good Housekeeping...I’m just looking at past covers, all 75 million of them and I can only see two with a man on the cover...one is Hugh Jackman and the other is Jamie Oliver...why are t there an equal amount male/female covers...why is House keeping a woman thing...?...sod off Good Housekeeping, this is very awful House Keeping...

[Crimson Dynamo]

She is still a fine looking woman, very classy

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I don't know what this woman has done to get such venom ,she seems nice enough and very attractive , she also seems to be a woman of morals ,so why not have her on a magazine cover?

Considering her Business...GH is an ideal for promoting it. Shes growing her business...its a family business and will continue to be so when she chooses to retire.
Good for them...a BA Pilot and Stewardess did very well for themselves.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Leeching off the royal connection I see. And look of course she is applauded for doing it. I wonder whyte?

Pretty much, but then again, there's more hate towards Meghan than a literal peado prince, so you can't expect rationality from this country. We are such a weak, gullible country.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I don't know what this woman has done to get such venom ,she seems nice enough and very attractive , she also seems to be a woman of morals ,so why not have her on a magazine cover?

But enough about Meghan Markle, this is about Kate's mom.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Pretty much, but then again, there's more hate towards Meghan than a literal peado prince, so you can't expect rationality from this country. We are such a weak, gullible country.

Rationality left a long time ago let's be honest

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well you bought her on to this thread....so expect people to respond.

Comment about what you like but posting flat out lies is just silly

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

You can guarantee if Megan's mother did a similar magazine spread the same people absolutely praising Kate's mum would be trashing Doria Ragland and calling her an attention seeker.

1st mention of Meghans mother on this post...so where is the lie?

[Glenn.]

I wonder how much she was paid

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I wonder how much she was paid

She paid them.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

She paid them.

[Marsh.]

"Oh no! Is Phillip alright?" she purred whilst writing out a cheque.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

"Oh no! Is Phillip alright?" she purred whilst writing out a cheque.

Asfsgdjkf

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

1st mention of Meghans mother on this post...so where is the lie?

You don't get it and I can't be bothered explaining it to you.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan won’t postpone Oprah interview as it’s ‘nothing to do with Prince Philip’

"..she said she wouldn’t because it has absolutely nothing to do with Prince Philip and that this is just an excuse by the palace to keep her muzzled."

Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2021/03/05/megha...ts?ito=cbshare

[arista]

Yes too much Cash
to be made in the 60 nations buying it from CBS USA.