[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

And?

What do you expect other people to do about it? Hold her at gunpoint?

Glad you find it funny

I don’t think people like her and many others having that kind of money sitting in a bank while millions around the world are in poverty should be seen as a good thing.

But I won’t stop you praising the filthy rich.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Meghan does something away from the cameras.... she lied about it, no proof.

Meghan does something in front of a camera.... ooh she made sure it was photographed.

Kate does both of these things whilst pocketing a big salary from the state.... oh she's amazing, selfless.

joker: now that’s funny’

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Glad you find it funny

I don’t think people like her and many others having that kind of money sitting in a bank while millions around the world are in poverty should be seen as a good thing.

But I won’t stop you praising the filthy rich.

I haven't praised anyone. A rational mind can see that. I see tonnes of praise for the monarchy though, that stole every penny they own.

But you continue grasping at tenuous ways that Meghan is evil, as I said earlier, if you need to invent and contort reasons to malign her, she mustn't be all that bad after all.

[Ammi]

...it is a bit bizarre, though...criticising any wealth of people while others have much less ....and yet no similar criticisms for the incredibly wealthy Royal family ...I mean, that sure is wealth beyond our wildest imagination right there...

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

...like calling Piers Morgan a Pot bellied pig isnt a personal attack on him..
Calling someone a manipulative evil homewrecker is someones opinion on the things she has done...she is manipulative and she publicly attacked Harry's family...some may see that as evil and homewrecking.
Calling someone a Pot Bellied Pig is a personal attack on someones looks...not actions. There is a big difference.

Piers Morgan is a bully who uses his platform to shout and belittle others . He can dish it out but can't take it .

That's funny considering Meghan HAS been attacked for everything , even petty stuff like nail varnish,her hair and even holding her baby bump for goodness sake .

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Glad you find it funny

I don’t think people like her and many others having that kind of money sitting in a bank while millions around the world are in poverty should be seen as a good thing.

But I won’t stop you praising the filthy rich.

Didn't you vote for Boris? Lets see you square the circle of caring about poverty now.

[Marsh.]

The fact I'm needing to spell out how Oprah's 2.6 billion dollar net worth is not Meghan's fault is staggering.

[The Slim Reaper]

Imagine holding H&M more personally responsible for poverty than your own voting history.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...it is a bit bizarre, though...criticising any wealth of people while others have much less ....and yet no similar criticisms for the incredibly wealthy Royal family ...I mean, that sure is wealth beyond our wildest imagination right there...

It's bias and hypocrisy at its finest, Meghan was criticised for so called 'blood diamond earrings' despite the entire monarchy soaking in blood money. But that gets conveniently ignored.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...it is a bit bizarre, though...criticising any wealth of people while others have much less ....and yet no similar criticisms for the incredibly wealthy Royal family ...I mean, that sure is wealth beyond our wildest imagination right there...

While Andrew was additionally employed by the UK government as a trade ambassador (he didn't need the money), he was allegedly molesting under aged sex slaves. I don't believe i have heard anyone requesting he repay his salary

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Piers Morgan is a bully who uses his platform to shout and belittle others . He can dish it out but can't take it .

That funny considering Meghan HAS been attacked for everything , even petty stuff like nail varnish,her hair and even holding her baby bump for goodness sake .

Thats fine...call him a bully then because you are judging by his actions not his looks...its your opinion just dont be personal. If anyone on this forum referred to Meghan as the Ugly Mermaid it would be totally unacceptable would it not?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

While Andrew was additionally employed by the UK government as a trade ambassador (he didn't need the money), he was allegedly molesting under aged sex slaves. I don't believe i have heard anyone requesting he repay his salary

Very good point.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Thats fine...call him a bully then because you are judging by his actions not his looks...its your opinion just dont be personal.

Everything said about Meghan is personal, people feel they are the experts on her relationship with her own father.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

It's bias and hypocrisy at its finest, Meghan was criticised for so called 'blood diamond earrings' despite the entire monarchy soaking in blood money. But that gets conveniently ignored.

...I’m sure there has been much controversy over time about returning some of the Crown Jewels to the countries where their history derives from, GoldHeart...

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Everything said about Meghan is personal, people feel they are the experts on her relationship with her own father.

And Harry, his bald patch got brought up and got taken the mic out of but nothing was said. I guess it’s only personal when it’s not Meghan or Harry.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Piers Morgan is a bully who uses his platform to shout and belittle others . He can dish it out but can't take it .

That's funny considering Meghan HAS been attacked for everything , even petty stuff like nail varnish,her hair and even holding her baby bump for goodness sake .

....and another point is that Meghan has used her platform to criticise The Royal Family..Harrys family...private family matters to the whole world.
....and funnily enough she can dish it but cant take it too....maybe 2 peas from the same pod

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by LukeB

And Harry, his bald patch got brought up and got taken the mic out of but nothing was said. I guess it’s only personal when it’s not Meghan or Harry.

Exactly
Apparently that's ok

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by LukeB

And Harry, his bald patch got brought up and got taken the mic out of but nothing was said. I guess it’s only personal when it’s not Meghan or Harry.

Well he has got a bald patch...so nothing wrong in calling him bald. But calling him a Big fat Bald Eagle is quite different.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Calling someone a Pot Bellied Pig is a personal attack on someones looks...not actions. There is a big difference.

"Pot-bellied", fair enough I agree there's no need to get personal about appearance. "Pig", on the other hand, I think is a fairly accurate description of Piers Morgan's actions.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well he has got a bald patch...so nothing wrong in calling him bald. But calling him a Big fat Bald Eagle is quite different.

There’s calling someone bald which is ok I guess and there’s taken the piss out of a bald patch. Two different things and taken the piss out of a bald patch is indeed a personal attack.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Exactly
Apparently that's ok

But no one has called him a Big Fat Bald Eagle have they....

Nothing wrong in referring to someone as Bald if they are bald

[user104658]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well he has got a bald patch...so nothing wrong in calling him bald. But calling him a Big fat Bald Eagle is quite different.

No if it's OK to take the piss out of Harry for being bald, then it's OK to take the piss out of Piers for being fat. I'm not saying that either is OK but you're advocating for a totally ludicrous double standard here.

"It's not ok to call Piers fat, but it's OK to point out that Harry is bald because he IS bald."

I mean I hate to be the one to point it out, but Piers is carrying a few extra pounds?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

....and another point is that Meghan has used her platform to criticise The Royal Family..Harrys family...private family matters to the whole world.
....and funnily enough she can dish it but cant take it too....maybe 2 peas from the same pod

Meghan is nothing like Piers , his behaviour towards her is disturbing and unhealthy. He obsesses over a woman he can't have. Imagine being Piers wife ,while he acts like a salty creep who's had his ego bruised.

Incorrect
Meghan did NOT use her platform to bash the royal family, she was calling out the lack of support and the cold treatment of the institution mainly .

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

But no one has called him a Big Fat Bald Eagle have they....

Nothing wrong in referring to someone as Bald if they are bald

Again makes no sense why Harry's hairline is being mocked ,when his brother has been going bald for years but whatever.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

"Pot-bellied", fair enough I agree there's no need to get personal about appearance.

Well that was my point....