[Pete.]

Originally Posted by arista

I say thanks for giving us the truth
"bigger and bigger
than many of us thought."
And keep up the great work you do here.

I agree

[Shaun]

can we also just dismiss the lily. thing since it was a completely different warning system then?

[Glenn.]

I was barely around when this went down but I do remember it happening and being disgusted by it. I still am and from what I've seen of her elsewhere online, she's still a nasty piece of work when she wants to be.

If it was a case of just saving pictures from the forum then maybe, but to hunt people's Facebook accounts and save their personal pictures is beyond creepy and she should be kept well away from the forum.

[sassysocks]

Originally Posted by Good King Glennceslas

I was barely around when this went down but I do remember it happening and being disgusted by it. I still am and from what I've seen of her elsewhere online, she's still a nasty piece of work when she wants to be.

If it was a case of just saving pictures from the forum then maybe, but to hunt people's Facebook accounts and save their personal pictures is beyond creepy and she should be kept well away from the forum.

It is creepy and very sad. I know teenage girls are not usually the nicest of people, shallow and self-obsessed much of the time, but they usually have some degree of social life outside of internet forums to occupy their thoughts -which it appeared Stacey did not.

However, as you say it was beyond creepy and I don't believe people would feel 'secure' if she was here and it would create an unease that would affect things people said and did.

[Kazanne]

I vaguely remember Stacey on here,I got on with her I think,I have spoken to her since and she seems like a nice enough girl.

[Vanessa]

We all make mistakes, but we all deserve a second chance i think.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

We all make mistakes, but we all deserve a second chance i think.

she seems creepy and nasty

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Petemitch123

she seems creepy and nasty

She was 15 at the time though.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

She was 15 at the time though.

Age means nothing to me she still seems creepy and nasty

[RichardG]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

She was 15 at the time though.

I was 14 when I joined and I've yet to save any pictures to my computer... I get that people mature at different ages and sometimes teenagers don't understand the consequences of the little things that they do but you're old enough at 15 to know that seeking out peoples facebook profiles and keeping folders full of members images is definitely not right.

To be honest, even if she has completely changed and is a totally different person I think the damage has already been done. People who want to keep in touch with her are more than welcome to do so offsite but I don't think it would be the right decision to allow her back on here. I'd say that goes for all permabanned members too. What's the point of having the option to permanently ban someone if we're going to bring them back again a couple of years later??

Equally - before anyone says anything - I think that anyone who invades another forum members privacy in such a way should be banned too. Ultimately we all originally signed up to this website to talk about a silly reality tv show, not to have our private lives exposed without our consent. It's totally unfair to the people involved.

[Z]

[Marcus.]

when I had my froum and Stacey was on there she was sweet but hearing that was like wowers

[Lee.]

I think this could go on forever.. Either way, I think the mods/admin need to put Scott out his misery, define an indefinite ban and make a decision on his future on the forum.

I do think it's a bit rotten that he's being left not knowing. Permaban him or let him back and all move on

[Z]

I was 13 when I joined here and I've never once been banned from the forum in the eight and a half years I've been an active member here for. I knew right from wrong when I was 13 and I still know right from wrong now that I'm 22. Trying to excuse people because of their is nonsense. She might have changed for the better now that she's 18, I wouldn't argue that whatsoever, but retrospectively saying "oh she was only 15" is a heap of ****e, especially coming from people who weren't even members of the forum back then.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by The baby Zeesus

I was 13 when I joined here and I've never once been banned from the forum in the eight and a half years I've been an active member here for. I knew right from wrong when I was 13 and I still know right from wrong now that I'm 22. Trying to excuse people because of their is nonsense. She might have changed for the better now that she's 18, I wouldn't argue that whatsoever, but retrospectively saying "oh she was only 15" is a heap of ****e, especially coming from people who weren't even members of the forum back then.

Not really because we are all different and we all mature at different times, and at the end of the day no one is perfect, but I take your point I wasn't around and I am going to leave this thread now as it is not really getting anywhere.

[Z]

Originally Posted by Cherie

[/B]


Not really because we are all different and we all mature at different times, and at the end of the day no one is perfect, but I take your point I wasn't around and I am going to leave this thread now as it is not really getting anywhere.

She was 15, not 5. She knew what she did was wrong at the time and she still knows it now.

[Lee.]

Lol wrong thread

[Josy]

The hypocrisy in these threads is actually unbelievable

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by ~HO~HO~HO~

The hypocrisy in these threads is actually unbelievable

It's not hypocritical at all, a member repeatedly being stalkerish yet be able to continue posting and be loved by the forum (by you for example) and someone who did something ONCE, years ago, when they were young, and nowhere near on the scale of Mollie/Mike, and is ashamed of their actions (she says herself she regrets it) be permabanned and hated on by so many members on this site, is what hypocrisy is

-exhales-

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Salman!

It's not hypocritical at all, a member repeatedly being stalkerish yet be able to continue posting and be loved by the forum (by you for example) and someone who did something ONCE, years ago, when they were young, and nowhere near on the scale of Mollie/Mike, who has admitted their actions (she says herself she regrets it) be permabanned and hated on, is what hypocrisy is

-exhales-

No the incident involving Mollie was a one time incident.

It must have took Stacey several "incidents" and some time to build up her "database".

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

No the incident involving Mollie was a one time incident.

It must have took Stacey several "incidents" and some time to build up her "database".

Umm no, you clearly don't know what else he's done so stop defending him. He saved pictures of me too and manipulated them and this was just weeks ago

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Salman!

Umm no, you clearly don't know what else he's done so stop defending him. He saved pictures of me too and manipulated them and this was just weeks ago

I'm not defending anyone, I'm pointing out the clear difference between the two incidents.

Whatever's happened with yourself is something different and if it's not out in the open on this forum is not relevant.

Originally Posted by 08marsh

How have I normalised anything? Pipe down.

I'm asking why people feel the need to hold onto these pathetic incidents from a long time ago instead of growing up and moving on.

The incident is over, what good is holding onto screenshots going to do? Seriously?

?

[Gstar]

[Amy Jade]

I miss Munchkinz.

[Drew.]

If it wasn't for Munch then Mollie might still be on here.