[arista]

Harris is jailed
for 5years 9 months

[Crimson Dynamo]

half of that time in jail

[Iceman]

Sentenced to 5 years and 9 months. Will do just under 3 years then released and will have to go on sex offenders register

[arista]

Maybe he will top himself

[Iceman]

Originally Posted by arista

Maybe he will top himself

No chance. Hes minted. He will leave prison and never be on tv again.

[mooo]

:/

[Marsh.]

Should leave him to rot in there.

[arista]

He had left the old wife at home today.


http://news.sky.com/story/1295047/ro...han-five-years

[Kizzy]

What's with the comedy tie?... Take some down with you rolf.

[Iceman]

I think that was a while ago when he was trying to portray the 'I'm an innocent old man' card

[joeysteele]

A complaint has been made to the attorney general's office as to the leniency of this sentence so it could be yet referred to appeal for a longer one.

[Josy]

What a ****ing sad excuse for a sentence. Absolutely disgraceful.

[CaudleHalbard]

He may die in jail.

[arista]

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Josy

What a ****ing sad excuse for a sentence. Absolutely disgraceful.

the long term inmates will for sure get him doubt he make it out

[lily.]

This whole thing saddens me. I grew up thinking he was a great guy... with his art, his comedy and his work with animals.

It is absolutely disgraceful that he has got away with his crimes until now and I really hope that sentence gets reviewed. He should rot in jail for what he has done.

[the truth]

the real crimes are with the children, the other idiots who jummped on the bandwagon like vanessa (he touched my knee 30 years ago or the other woman , he kissed me 30 years ago are a disgrace and devalue the true crimes of his disgusting paedophilia. im gutted too, wonderful entertainer who did so much for charity, animals, kids etc goes to show you charity has again been used as a cover for corruption. time to scrap charity and simply ensure our taxes go to the causes we care most about

[Jack_]

^ 'true' crimes...wtf? Any kind of sexual assault is appalling, it's not a competition

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Jack_

^ 'true' crimes...wtf? Any kind of sexual assault is appalling, it's not a competition

rubbish. hand on knee 40 years ago, kissed on lips 35 years ago....eh? thats NOT sexual assault

[Jack_]

Moving your hand along someone's leg and up their dress when they haven't consented to it is sexual assault. This isn't up for debate.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Moving your hand along someone's leg and up their dress when they haven't consented to it is sexual assault. This isn't up for debate.

allegedly. how far up? what about the thousands of women who tear off famous mens shorts? jagger has had all his clothes ripped off him umpteen times? how precious are we going to get?

[Jack_]

Oh how predictable, everything always has to come back to women vs men with you. Did Jagger object to having his clothes ripped off? If he did then it's sexual assault, if he enjoyed it and went along with it is it not

Vanessa Feltz did not want his hand moving along his leg under her dress when she was in the middle of a live television broadcast, it is sexual assault. If a famous man had come out claiming that a woman was moving her hand up his leg and began undoing his trousers in the same situation you would be calling for her to be stoned to death, that's the fact of the matter here. It's only because it's Vanessa that you don't believe her

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Oh how predictable, everything always has to come back to women vs men with you. Did Jagger object to having his clothes ripped off? If he did then it's sexual assault, if he enjoyed it and went along with it is it not

Vanessa Feltz did not want his hand moving along his leg under her dress when she was in the middle of a live television broadcast, it is sexual assault. If a famous man had come out claiming that a woman was moving her hand up his leg and began undoing his trousers in the same situation you would be calling for her to be stoned to death, that's the fact of the matter here. It's only because it's Vanessa that you don't believe her

yes big deal
he has done far worse with younger women and girls

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Oh how predictable, everything always has to come back to women vs men with you. Did Jagger object to having his clothes ripped off? If he did then it's sexual assault, if he enjoyed it and went along with it is it not

Vanessa Feltz did not want his hand moving along his leg under her dress when she was in the middle of a live television broadcast, it is sexual assault. If a famous man had come out claiming that a woman was moving her hand up his leg and began undoing his trousers in the same situation you would be calling for her to be stoned to death, that's the fact of the matter here. It's only because it's Vanessa that you don't believe her

how predictable its always on the womens side against the men with you zzzz
IF its a serious thing go to the police, otherwise she should shut the hell up...all shes doing is using it for self publicity under the false guise shes doing it for other supposed victims. instead shes devaluing the true sufferers of abuse. as for calling someone to be stoned to death for feeling a mans penis, youre LYING again of course. Ive seen many a woman do that and no I didnt advocate stoning her. besides men are not so petty as to try and make a massive issue every time a woman even touches or kisses them without an invite....just to get cheap publicity....its a shame you are so biased for women in all situations.

[Jack_]

WOW.

just wow