[SoBig]

Hayden.

[Marc]

I highly doubt Enzo will win the second part, he is useless. However Lane's memory is shocking!

Maybe they should just by-pass the second part of it and just give the title to Hayden LOL.

Hayden has proven that he is a worthy winner when it comes to winning competitions.

[Captain.Remy]

How surprising....

Hopefully Lane wins the mind part. I hope so because he's somehow rubbish at mind games lmao

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Marc.

I highly doubt Enzo will win the second part, he is useless. However Lane's memory is shocking!

Maybe they should just by-pass the second part of it and just give the title to Hayden LOL.

Hayden has proven that he is a worthy winner when it comes to winning competitions.

Well too bad that winning Competitions doesn't make you a worthy winner ffs.

[Captain.Remy]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Well too bad that winning Competitions doesn't make you a worthy winner ffs.

Well, too bad this year's cast is stupid, dumb and clueless as fuck. They will vote for Hayden to win on a massive scale based on how cute he is, how nice he is, how strong in competitions he is. He's the guy next door everybody likes. I'd rather see a weak final 2 (Enzo and Lane ) rather than a very predictable winner straight away.

This season sucked anyway. No creativity, no imagination, majority rules big time, people scared of taking risks. Yeah it sucked.

[Chilltown]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Well too bad that winning Competitions doesn't make you a worthy winner ffs.

That's not really up to you to decide. Competitions are just as apart of the game as the social and strategic element. You don't need to necessarily follow the Richard Hatch route to win the game as some have proven in the past. It's all up to the Jury on who played the best game. Everything is a matter of perception.

I know winning competitions were a pivotal argument in why Dan/Jordan deserved to win over Memphis/Natalie. But then you can look at someone like Ryan who dominated competitions similar to Hayden has and he still lost against someone who only won a few comps.

[Captain.Remy]

Originally Posted by Chilltown

That's not really up to you to decide. Competitions are just as apart of the game as the social and strategic element. You don't need to necessarily follow the Richard Hatch route to win the game as some have proven in the past. It's all up to the Jury on who played the best game. Everything is a matter of perception.

I know winning competitions were a pivotal argument in why Dan/Jordan deserved to win over Memphis/Natalie. But then you can look at someone like Ryan who dominated competitions similar to Hayden has and he still lost against someone who only won a few comps.

But Adam still had a chance to beat Ryan.
Now Hayden is an obvious choice and I honestly don't see how he cannot win if he makes the final 2. It seems like everybody likes him a LOT so it takes over the game. Like I said, this cast is very weak so it won't surprise me if the reasons they crown him are "he is cute", "he is nice" etc...

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Chilltown

That's not really up to you to decide. Competitions are just as apart of the game as the social and strategic element. You don't need to necessarily follow the Richard Hatch route to win the game as some have proven in the past. It's all up to the Jury on who played the best game. Everything is a matter of perception.

I know winning competitions were a pivotal argument in why Dan/Jordan deserved to win over Memphis/Natalie. But then you can look at someone like Ryan who dominated competitions similar to Hayden has and he still lost against someone who only won a few comps.

I'm not saying people have to take the Richard Hatch route, all I'm saying is that in a strategic game like Big Brother, you can't base who is more deserving based on how many Competitions they won. you can be a good winner and be good at Competitions, you can be a good winner and be bad at Competitions. But you can't be a good winner because you win Competitions, or a bad winner because you lose Competitions.

[Marc]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Well too bad that winning Competitions doesn't make you a worthy winner ffs.

Calm down.

I was just saying, on paper he seems the most worthy to win because he's won more competitions than the others. Enzo hasn't proven that he deserves to win in my eyes, and all Lane had was Britney to manipulate and a lone HoH.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Marc.

Calm down.

I was just saying, on paper he seems the most worthy to win because he's won more competitions than the others. Enzo hasn't proven that he deserves to win in my eyes, and all Lane had was Britney to manipulate and a lone HoH.

I'm calm, but this is a strategic game. You can't win just by winning Competitions. This isn't the Olympics, this isn't the World Series, you have to have a strategy and a social game. Everyone keeps saying Enzo doesn't deserve it because he sucks at Competitions, yet Will is regarded as the best player ever and how good was he in Competitions? It's hypocritical and wrong. Enzo's worthy of making it this far, as are Hayden and Lane.