Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 875
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 875
|
Is Luke entertaining without Bex?
Most times people defend Luke's actions, it is with the reason that he is "ENTERTAINING". Ok, he makes me smile at his over the top unexpected womanly shrills but that only ever happens when Rebecca's in a mood to mess about with Luke.
Every other time, he's just being a deceitful, manipulative creep who's got most housemates wrapped around his finger so since day one has missed being nominated by his fellow HM.
When he entered the house I thought he would be a Eugene kindly geek, "never smokes, drinks, swears, does drugs" implying some sort of pure, kind nature - perhaps someone trustworthy. But as we've all seen, that's everything he is not.
Without Rebecca to play with, he's always backstabbing other housemates, stirring up the house to cause even more trouble. To other people that's entertainment - riles me up personally, but that's just me.
Whilst I wouldn't necessarily want Luke out now, what I do want is the other housemates to see exactly what kind of person he is, but he seems to be too expertly duplicitous for enough housemates to catch on. I don't think even Luke is aware how dark a character he is being.
To people that give him the benefit of the doubt and say he's been tainted... - Luke has been vicious to begin with.
If/when Bex goes before him, will he just resort to constant whining and spreading his malicious words as he has done?
|