[Sticks]

People are slagging of Rachel, so I wondered how she would campare with the other slated series, BB4 won by Cameron.

(Sorry Cameron if you are still here)

I would have to say that Cameron was handed victory for BB4, thanks to the House Swap with the African BB House, where as Rachel had everything trown at her, and she was seriously mucked about when she became Head of House.

Cameron was a dead cert, but Rachel came in on a close finish.

I tend to think that those who make it are more worthy than those who stroll passed the winning post without breaking a sweat, as some other winners in the past have done.

So if BB9 is considered as poor as BB4 is slated, I would say Rachel was slightly better than Cameron as she had a hard time than he.

[*mazedsalv**]

I think that many of the winners were handed the victory. The only ones I didnt think that were was Craig, Brian D, Kate and Rachel. They had no special treatment in editing, they werent being traeted like Gods by BB producers.... tbh the BB producers didnt like Rachel, and i bet were shocked when she won.

[001steven]

cameron was the worse winner and he belongs to the boringest BB EVER

[Shaun]

Very few of the winners have been the bookies favourite... Rachel wasn't, Michael was. Brian wasn't, Samanda were.

And I agree with the claim that Rachel had a tougher time in the House, her victory was more rewarding for her I feel. Perhaps the most rewarding since Nadia's.

[Fom]

Cameron was the better winner, better than people like to think...

[MrGaryy]

Rachel for me. At least I think - for the most part - she was genuine. In Cameron, you would always see little tibbets of nastiness and double standards slip through his facade. I never warmed to him.

[Markymark]

Cameron is a good man, he's done well for himself and other people without selling out to the tabloids and magazines. He's not interested in fame and fortune, just like Rachel. It will always be harder for girls to win though.

[Sticks]

Out of interest Cameron from BB4 is actually a member here, any chance of someone getting to come back and say how Rachel's time compares with his?

[Tom]

Originally posted by Fom
Cameron was the better winner, better than people like to think...

I don't like Cameron but there are a lot of members (especially on here) who never even watched/seen BB4 and jump on the "Cameron is the most boring winner ever" bandwagon.

[Dal1966]

Originally posted by Sticks
People are slagging of Rachel, so I wondered how she would campare with the other slated series, BB4 won by Cameron.

(Sorry Cameron if you are still here)

I would have to say that Cameron was handed victory for BB4, thanks to the House Swap with the African BB House, where as Rachel had everything trown at her, and she was seriously mucked about when she became Head of House.

Cameron was a dead cert, but Rachel came in on a close finish.

I tend to think that those who make it are more worthy than those who stroll passed the winning post without breaking a sweat, as some other winners in the past have done.

So if BB9 is considered as poor as BB4 is slated, I would say Rachel was slightly better than Cameron as she had a hard time than he.

I have to agree.
Cameron was handed his victory, but Rachel has had to endure bullying, backstabbing, bitching, biased editing and Davina being against her.
For me too, Rachel was entertaining were as Cameron did absolutely nothing.