[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by *mazedsalv**

You cant compare the two.

Tiffany had an attitude but used it in a clever way. She never personally went against people and picked on them. She had her rows, but hardly held grudges, She was also witty and i'd say 80% of the time in the house were "fun" moments. She actually liked her HMs and had fun with them. She didn't start a row with everyone during nominations, call everyone fake and offend the British HMs calling them weak (something both Natalie and Farrah did) and Natalie argued for around 95% of her time. No substance in her rows.

They are completely different.

When people see Tiffany they think of her witty moments more than her rows. Natalie had no witty moments.

If Natalie is the sort of HM that is praised, God help us. So, it really takes someone to just say "your all fake, i hate you all" to become "QUEEEEEENNN". Embarrassment. And it's embarrassing to the BB fans.

The other villains had something more about them, Makosi was entertaining, as was Bea in certain ways. They did something more than "just row" like Natalie and Farrah did. It was like they were told to never show a nice side, they were 1 dimensional.

Bea was NEVER entertaining, she was very manipulative , sly and vile !! . she had me fooled in her first week then I saw through her BS ! , she over stayed her welcome! She should of been evicted straight away !!! .