[Gusto Brunt]

Roddy was a big loss. ����

[*mazedsalv**]

I laughed.

It was so C5 to do.

[BBDodge]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

It may have been the condom incident as he was on a final warning.

But they showed that incident so if that was the reason they could have shown him being told to leave.

There was clearly something else that they refuse to divulge. Hopefully some other housemate with spill the beans before C5 are able to hush them up.

[Jase.]

They pulled this **** with Alexander O'Neal too

[Jack_]

Did this ever happen with a removal on C4? I was trying to think earlier but I think most ejections were aired and explained

[tanussa]

it totally sucks. they make the series for the viewers, they know we would want and deserve an explanation. it really isnt good enough. what could be that bad that they couldnt explain it, even if they have to dilute all the details

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Did this ever happen with a removal on C4? I was trying to think earlier but I think most ejections were aired and explained

Coolio remains the only housemate I can think of who’s status was known as “left” instead of “walked” or “evicted” or “removed.”

[Rob!]

If it’s a legal issue, there’s not a lot that bitching about it is going to achieve. I’m sure we’ll find out what happened in the fullness of time. Rodrigo’s “here I am” sounded reserved, deflated and like someone who knew what was coming. This series more than most on Channel 5, I do actually think they would tell us if they could.

[Maru]

Maybe they are saving the "reasoning" behind his exit for next episode... to extend things a little bit?... bad reasoning, but anything is possible at this point

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I think it's clear there wasn't a further incident, but BB felt more pressure from the sponsors.

..this is what I think also, Marsh...they had lost some sponsorship through putting Dan in there when originally Rodrigo had just gained Ofcom complaints but not loss of sponsorship..?...Ofcom complaints are on the whole fine with them I think because they contribute to the controversy and interest and talking points etc..but the loss of sponsorship was becoming very concerning to them as it was starting to multiply with their generally grim decisions, both in putting Dan in and with Rodrigo’s previous unacceptable comments...maybe there was some type of incident but so much is concealed when it’s an agenda to conceal or manipulate highlights or etc..?...this time no though, he was gone in a second because of the losing of sponsorship is what I think...having said that, he should have been ejected immediately before for me...that was the responsibility they had to the public, to show the seriousness of what he said and how that could never be allowed on their show...

[Maxxie.]

Originally Posted by Rob!

Coolio remains the only housemate I can think of who’s status was known as “left” instead of “walked” or “evicted” or “removed.”

They still showed Coolio's exit though, the diary room and all. BB told the house he left on "mutual agreement" which is kinda true I guess

[Maxxie.]

The funny thing is c5 have been quite good with the public this year, releasing stormy daniels vt etc. So imo if there not showing/explaining the rodrigo situation I think they have a good reason to.

[T*]

it’s shooting themselves in the foot