[Headie]

Originally Posted by Withano

They arent at all predictable lol, thats probably why theyre adored.

We probably get about 2 unpredictable head to heads per series if we're lucky.

[Headie]

Mess if they'd used this format in the last summer series then the first eviction (based off noms - not the silly members club thingy) would've been Sarah vs Chad and the series before would've seen Jedward vs Kim mid-series

[tiger_greengrass]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Whether you like or dislike the evictees you can't deny it's made for very predictable eviction nights. The 2nd eviction hasn't even happened yet and yet we're all talking about is as a foregone conclusion because it's just so obviously predictable

I don't agree, the first one could've went either way.

[rusticgal]

Face to face will surely happen...

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Hayden

We probably get about 2 unpredictable head to heads per series if we're lucky.

I couldnt predict the last one or this one, so its already 2 for 2 haha.

I think the reason to dislike it could be ‘the big characters are more likely to go’, but ‘predictable’ just isnt a reason really.

[NotARylanFan]

Never been a fan of head-to-heads tbh.

I actually much preferred the way BBAU did things - it was always the three with the most votes, with extras being added if there was a tie for third place. It kept things interesting as it wasn't an either/or situation - plus it made the result less obvious if there was going to be a clear winner with the most votes to save.

[BBDodge]

The big problem with just 2 up is where the house has split into teams (insiders/outsiders; cool gang/uncool gang, etc.).

The bigger team block votes (after a bit of unsubtle hinting) and puts up two of the smaller group every week until only one remains.

[GoldHeart]

So it's always going to be head to head ? .
I'm curious how things would of gone if Roxy was up as well

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Mess if they'd used this format in the last summer series then the first eviction (based off noms - not the silly members club thingy) would've been Sarah vs Chad and the series before would've seen Jedward vs Kim mid-series

Awful

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Mess if they'd used this format in the last summer series then the first eviction (based off noms - not the silly members club thingy) would've been Sarah vs Chad and the series before would've seen Jedward vs Kim mid-series

Now I'm more mad, both of these would have been ideal.

[Scream]

I did want 2 people up each week but I can see how damaging it can be to a series. I think we need 3 up rule instead

It just needs to be consistent but we don't want nearly all the house up

[Greg!]

3 up would work but only if it was VTS

[y.winter]

I love it. It makes it more dramatic and powerful. Head to head, normally rival camps, 50% of your favourite going once they're up.

Though I do wonder if all we're going to get this series is "Hardeep vs. X", because he's going to be nominated every week until he leaves... if that happens...