[Kizzy]

I don't think yaniv has sued an individual has he, I thought he just sued the businesses on human rights grounds for refusal of service?

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't think yaniv has sued an individual has he, I thought he just sued the businesses on human rights grounds for refusal of service?

Technically yeah as far as I know, but suing the businesses of single (meaning, only they are employed, not single single) women working out of their homes, is kind of the same thing as suing individuals IMO.

Human rights It is not a human right to force women to touch your balls tbh. Its just so ridiculous I don't understand why the courts are even entertaining it all.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Technically yeah as far as I know, but suing the businesses of single (meaning, only they are employed, not single single) women working out of their homes, is kind of the same thing as suing individuals IMO.

Human rights It is not a human right to force women to touch your balls tbh. Its just so ridiculous I don't understand why the courts are even entertaining it all.

Ah yeah they were just loan businesswoman, I'm guessing that's why they were targetted but yaniv wont be able to get Blair for refusal of service..

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Ah yeah they were just loan businesswoman, I'm guessing that's why they were targetted but yaniv wont be able to get Blair for refusal of service..

Hate speech or something though possibly, if she 'misgenders' him. I'm sure he will think of something.

They seem to have been targetted for being both lone busineswomen, and being immigrants (and religious, in a couple of them). Or so it seems by whats being said in the tribunal thing.