[Moniqua]

all this one sided hatred of a woman so above you in terms of class, regality and decorum will do no favours to you in the long run @ the crusties and dusties of this thread

it’s no secret that hateful white people age like milk...but do you i guess?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well at least its content is far more interesting than those that just give a one line dig at everyone constantly and an inability to debate.

You mean like you? Hypocrisy doesn't suit you.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

There is a lot more to being a senior member of the Royal Family than ribbon cutting, as Meghan found out and quickly bailed. It's hard boring work.
All high profile people get abuse from the press occassionally, especially when they seem to thrive on attention, as Meghan does. She left the UK for a quiet life, right?, but she keeps popping up by jumping on the latest bandwagon like clockwork or suing people.
Strong people just ignore the press clamour, like the Queen and Kate, who is said to have a spine of steel. I can well believe it, with 19 patronages, sporting organizations, and her and Wills own foundation to take care of, plus 3 young children. Thats what I call strong and independent,earning your keep, and all that.... not sponging off billionaires and celebs like Oprah you didn't even know previously for accomodation and work who wouldn't give you the time of day if you were just that whats - her - name actress in that legal drama thingy that her ex got her into.

Once again, it will be the influence of others who will get her something to do.
Watch this space.

I didn't ask you to repeat your nonsense.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Still in denial then? Or is love really blind?

Love?
I think you'll find there's only one of us feeling passionate emotions about 2 people we don't know, strong enough to continue to fuel hateful essays about them.

And it's.... you.

[Liam-]

Meghan hasn’t done anything wrong that we can actually judge, all the information people get of her come from anonymous sources used by rags desperate to sell papers and get clicks, nothing sells more than making up lies about a confident, outspoken woman, especially a minority one.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Love?
I think you'll find there's only one of us feeling passionate emotions about 2 people we don't know, strong enough to continue to fuel hateful essays about them.

And it's.... you.

LOL.

Oh give over with the high drama, you trouble maker you.

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Because becoming part of the Royal Family you take on a role or job if you like aswell as being a wife, husband, mother, father so your response is niave. Any job or firm you take or join has rules, dress code, expected behaviour and that includes the Royal Family because perhaps you can appreciate they are not just any family. The priviliges you get...a home, chefs, dressers, cleaners...it goes on and on. They want for nothing and it all gets paid by the tax payer.
Sadly there are a generation of people who think they can just dive in and do things the way they want to with NO RESPECT for anybody but themselves.

[Tom4784]

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

LOL.

Oh give over with the high drama, you trouble maker you.

Then stop with the passionate essays for people you claim to not care about.

Otherwise... people will think you care.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

It's really sad when it's not ridiculously hilarious.

[jet]

https://www.msn.com/en-sg/entertainm...poM?li=BBr8Cnr

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's application to trademark their new charitable organisation Archewell has been rejected, it has been reported.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who stepped down as working royals earlier this year, had their application turned down because they did not sign the document and they did not pay all the required fees, documents seen by The Sun have revealed.

The paperwork, which was submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on March 3, was also said to be 'too vague'.

What a shambles. Without the Palace to guide them they are making a right hash of things.

[Marsh.]

The Daily Mail? Really?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Then stop with the passionate essays for people you claim to not care about.

Otherwise... people will think you care.

OMG no!
I must obey Marsh and stop immediately!

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The Daily Mail? Really?

The Daily Mail what? You don't believe the excerpt about Archewell then?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

The usual, paint by numbers, unimaginative response to opinions and ideas that don't match your own.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

The Daily Mail what? You don't believe the excerpt about Archewell then?

Do I find tabloids who report gossip based on "sources" truthful? No.

Do I find anything in the article reason enough to slate Harry and Meghan? No.

Trademark applications are very involved. It being returned because they've missed things out is not unusual. Tabloids taking innocuous information and turning it into a series of insulting articles is also not unusual.

But... people latch onto anything to justify irrational hatred. I remember the shocking.... DOG WALKING article.

[Marsh.]

Nice to see you've decided to start quoting sources though, you refused to do that a while back.

Disappointed they are, in fact, tabloids though.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

The usual, paint by numbers, unimaginative response to opinions and ideas that don't match your own.

Why write an essay when you can surmise a topic in a sentence?

The hatred towards her has always been ridiculous, to obsess over hating her is plain bizarre, to scour for articles to justify that hatred is bizarre. It's just all bizarre.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Do I find tabloids who report gossip based on "sources" truthful? No.

Do I find anything in the article reason enough to slate Harry and Meghan? No.

Trademark applications are very involved. It being returned because they've missed things out is not unusual. Tabloids taking innocuous information and turning it into a series of insulting articles is also not unusual.

But... people latch onto anything to justify irrational hatred. I remember the shocking.... DOG WALKING article.

The reporting of the Archewell foundation app being rejected wasn't gossip, it was factual. Where in the article were they 'slated'?

IMO missing signing the document in particular is pure incompetence. Is no -one advising this pair?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

The reporting of the Archewell foundation app being rejected wasn't gossip, it was factual. Where in the article were they 'slated'?

IMO missing signing the document in particular is pure incompetence. Is no -one advising this pair?

You... were using it to slate them. You... brought it into a discussion thread about Meghan's treatment by the press.

Unless you believed it to be relevant to that you wouldn't have shared it.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You... were using it to slate them. You... brought it into a discussion thread about Meghan's treatment by the press.

Unless you believed it to be relevant to that you wouldn't have shared it.

It shows that the Press often just report facts....and how they didn't point out how incompetent the pair of them were to miss out even the signing of a document supposed to be extemely important to them. They could have made much of that one if they wanted.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

It shows that the Press often just report facts....and how they didn't point out how incompetent the pair of them were to miss out even the signing of a document supposed to be extemely important to them. They could have made much of that one if they wanted.

Like you are now?

Grrr Meghan didn't sign something! GRRR!!!

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Moniqua

it’s no secret that hateful white people age like milk...but do you i guess?

...says someone who calls out everyone as a racist

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

I watch Royal documentries and you cant get closer to the truth than Royal Correspondants and associates of other members of the Royals. You cant have any more legitimate source than that. Harry and Williams fall out was so called hearsay until he admitted it on NT...these rumours dont come from no where.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.