[Gypsy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Where does it say this?

literally in the first sentence of the BBC article you linked when posting the thread

they have every right to sue to protect their child's privacy whether they live in LA or London!

[hijaxers]

I am cheesed off with hearing their names , it was obvious this would happen and i can see these two spending half their life in court suing individuals and papers, whilst over prrotecting Archie.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by jet

They leave the UK(and then Toronto) to get away from ‘press intrusion’ and move to LA, which is known as the Paparazzi capital. A ridiculous excuse to get back to where she intended to get back to all along. Is it more important to have a Hollywood lifestyle or to make sure your child is protected?
No way would invasion like that happen in the UK, but its par for the course in LA celebrity land. When they come out of lockdown and are out and about they are going to be papped wherever they go. But Meghan will have known that….

Originally Posted by Gypsy

literally in the first sentence of the BBC article you linked when posting the thread

they have every right to sue to protect their child's privacy whether they live in LA or London!

Do you not understand allegation?

[jet]

Originally Posted by arista

They should be living somewhere that suits them both...not just 'I want the big celebrity lifestyle' Meghan.
If she really loves Harry and isn't just using him to climb to the heights she has lusted after her whole life, she needs to think about him and their child too, not just her selfish self.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Swan

Sad thing is, watch in 6 months when they make a deal (for a huge sum) with OK for pictures of their kid to be plastered all over the rag.

That's not really the point though is it Swan , and even if they do decide to do that it's irrelevant.

Arranging a photo or magazine deal is on your terms and it's a mutual agreement. How can you think a drone / paparazzi flying over someone's home without their permission is the same ??? .

Even the biggest lime light lover would still need privacy to recuperate and relax .

[jet]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

That's not really the point though is it Swan , and even if they do decide to do that it's irrelevant.

Arranging a photo or magazine deal is on your terms and it's a mutual agreement. How can you think a drone / paparazzi flying over someone's home without their permission is the same ??? .

Even the biggest lime light lover would still need privacy to recuperate and relax .

As has just been said on Sky News, there was an agreement with the UK press not to take any photos of them or any royal children unless they were authorised. They walked away from all that knowingly into a lion’s den.
They can live anywhere they want to, but they chose LA, the paparazzi capital of the world? If they really want the privacy they insist they do, does that make any sense?

[Glenn.]

Let’s be honest the Meghan haters will think this is completely fine because it goes against Meghan. May as well just close the thread.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Let’s be honest the Meghan haters will think this is completely fine because it goes against Meghan. May as well just close the thread.

I dislike both. Proud to be an anti-royalist. I think both of them are equally ridiculous.

But again, i only see what goes on with them via this forum.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Swan

I dislike both. Proud to be an anti-royalist. I think both of them are equally ridiculous.

But again, i only see what goes on with them via this forum.

At least you’re honest about why you dislike them though.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

At least you’re honest about why you dislike them though.

I guess. The only thing i'd debate about her is that she's not a beautiful looking woman, she quite clearly is.

But again, yeah i have no time for any Royals whatsoever, i hate everything they stand for.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Anne, Edward and Andrew (until now) managed to avoid much public scrutiny and have lived their lives pretty peacefully

I mean

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I mean

Some charity event? what’s your point, Anne goes about her duties and there is no fanfare, she is the future Kings sister just like Harry is the future Kings brother, if he really wanted a quite life it’s there for him, how often do you read about Anne ...rarely yet she carries out the most duties

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Some charity event? what’s your point, Anne goes about her duties and there is no fanfare, she is the future Kings sister just like Harry is the future Kings brother, if he really wanted a quite life it’s there for him, how often do you read about Anne ...rarely yet she carries out the most duties

So if Meghan did a charity gameshow on telly and said she was actively seeking a career in TV and theatre, nobody would be complaining? If so, why did she get so much **** for that elephant documentary that was for charity?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

At least you’re honest about why you dislike them though.

[Amy Jade]

Oh and Andrew kept his life private because he's a peado.

Allegedly.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

People who think like you honestly disturb me.

A parent can pick and choose where a picture of their child is take and put, taking a photo with a photographer in a safe environment is totally normal, flying a ****ing drone over a home to slyly sneak pictures of kids is disgusting.

People like you disturb me too when they can't quite grasp what im saying, and heaven't read my other posts in this thread.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by jet

As has just been said on Sky News, there was an agreement with the UK press not to take any photos of them or any royal children unless they were authorised. They walked away from all that knowingly into a lion’s den.
They can live anywhere they want to, but they chose LA, the paparazzi capital of the world? If they really want the privacy they insist they do, does that make any sense?

Put yourself in their shoes would you be happy? , yeah so what ?? What about famous actors in Hollywood are you saying they don't deserve any privacy Either? .

This isn't Sandra bullock walking down the street with shades or Chris Hemsworth in a coffee shop ie public places .

If bullock & Hemsworth were in their gardens & homes then it would be crossing the line for paparazzi to photograph & spy on them .

why is thst hard to understand ? Especially when Harry & Meghan have a child they're trying to protect .

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Its not 'creepy'....its big money. The Americans love a bit of Royalty its all good money to them.

It's not creepy.... because they make money from it.

Yeah, that makes it more so.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Im going to have to sue Google...my garden is all over the internet...

When in doubt, outright lie about why she is suing I guess?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

They should be living somewhere that suits them both...not just 'I want the big celebrity lifestyle' Meghan.
If she really loves Harry and isn't just using him to climb to the heights she has lusted after her whole life, she needs to think about him and their child too, not just her selfish self.

Harry's confidante is back.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Put yourself in their shoes would you be happy? , yeah so what ?? What about famous actors in Hollywood are you saying they don't deserve any privacy Either? .

This isn't Sandra bullock walking down the street with shades or Chris Hemsworth in a coffee shop ie public places .

If bullock & Hemsworth were in their gardens & homes then it would be crossing the line for paparazzi to photograph & spy on them .

why is thst hard to understand ? Especially when Harry & Meghan have a child they're trying to protect .

Because it means agreeing with something Meghan is doing... they despise her that much that they refuse to see things rationally.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

They should be living somewhere that suits them both...not just 'I want the big celebrity lifestyle' Meghan.
If she really loves Harry and isn't just using him to climb to the heights she has lusted after her whole life, she needs to think about him and their child too, not just her selfish self.

Jesus Christ just give it a rest.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Jesus Christ just give it a rest.

Literally the Meghan Markle version of Candyman.

[Brother Leon]

What was your opinion when Kate sued The French magazine because of their photos mate?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Brother Leon

What was your opinion when Kate sued The French magazine because of their photos mate?

This !