[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

BIB is the important part; it has already been hypothesised by the scientific community that antibody immunity may be temporary, but T-cell immunity may be long lasting (several decades). T-cell immunity means that you can catch the virus again and carry it, but symptoms are likely to be very mild or non-existant.

It’s good that the second time you’ll have mild or no symptoms but if you still pass it on then it’s just as dangerous


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

LBC just reported
Birmingham Zone
will tomorrow, go into special measures
due to High Covid-19 cases.

[Liam-]

I’d like to say I’m surprised, but I’m anything but, the cruelty knows no bounds

[joeysteele]

This doesn't shock or surprise me.

This is the example of deceit from this lot.
Vile and heartless from the core not just to the core.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

I’d like to say I’m surprised, but I’m anything but, the cruelty knows no bounds

horrific

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Zizu

It’s good that the second time you’ll have mild or no symptoms but if you still pass it on then it’s just as dangerous


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

True but if there really is no hope of a lasting vaccine then it becoming less dangerous to humans over time (which is what would happen in 2 or 3 generations) because of resistance is good news. Not necessarily for people right now, but for the human race. If there's no hope of a vaccine, no antibody herd immunity and no T-cell immunity then it would be repeated cycles forever, which would essentially mean that people living much beyond 70 / living at all with long term health conditions just wouldn't happen any more.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Liam-

I’d like to say I’m surprised, but I’m anything but, the cruelty knows no bounds

Nothing they do shocks me anymore.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Liam-

I’d like to say I’m surprised, but I’m anything but, the cruelty knows no bounds

Originally Posted by Cherie

horrific

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Nothing they do shocks me anymore.

It's awful and Hancock should have resigned/been fired long ago, but this particular case feels more like oversight than anything else - aren't you only allowed benefits if you have less than like £10k in savings? Hopefully a loophole will be put in place to cover this.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

It's awful and Hancock should have resigned/been fired long ago, but this particular case feels more like oversight than anything else - aren't you only allowed benefits if you have less than like £10k in savings? Hopefully a loophole will be put in place to cover this.

Read it. The government had a choice whether this would infringe on benefits or not, and they made sure it did.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

True but if there really is no hope of a lasting vaccine then it becoming less dangerous to humans over time (which is what would happen in 2 or 3 generations) because of resistance is good news. Not necessarily for people right now, but for the human race. If there's no hope of a vaccine, no antibody herd immunity and no T-cell immunity then it would be repeated cycles forever, which would essentially mean that people living much beyond 70 / living at all with long term health conditions just wouldn't happen any more.

Krap ... I’ve only got around 7 years left ... and I still haven’t played for Brazil yet ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[James]

It would be very easy for doctors to put a cause of death on a medical certificate as coronavirus rather than, say, pneumonia, if they knew that it would get the family compensation.

The government has to be careful of that. Or is it only awarded after a positive test for Covid?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by James

It would be very easy for doctors to put a cause of death on a medical certificate as coronavirus rather than, say, pneumonia, if they knew that it would get the family compensation.

The government has to be careful of that. Or is it only awarded after a positive test for Covid?

Sorry James, but what? Are you suggesting the government absolutely have to make sure that welfare recipients are shafted, in case doctors are gaming the system for absolutely no reason?

[James]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Sorry James, but what? Are you suggesting the government absolutely have to make sure that welfare recipients are shafted, in case doctors are gaming the system for absolutely no reason?

No, it's unrelated to the story above. I just commenting on the scheme itself.

[arista]

[The Slim Reaper]

Far left, anti-school, mum campaigners

Welcome comrades, for over a century we have worked tirelessly to implement the philosophies of Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin. Mission accomplished.

[The Slim Reaper]

Crony capitalism

[arista]

1,184
today's new cases of Covid-19.


SkyNewsHD


Today 16 dead.

UK Total Covid-19 Deaths :41,499

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Crony capitalism

Look at the ports business and who got those multi million pound contracts, pigs in the trough, funnelling money from the public purse.
There is no scrutiny. . It's accepted that they are literally giving these sums to anyone with no regulation or accountibiliity.