Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
The rules are that if you have had contact with someone who tests positive, you isolate for 14 days. That's it. That simple.
There is no "... unless you've had it before so you're probably immune or think you probably won't have caught it" clause.
Is it unlikely that he'll have caught it? Probably. SHOULD it be that previously infected people don't have to isolate again? Maybe so. But currently, that's not the rule. So I'm not sure why anyone is confused about why he has to isolate.
|
So that's me your sniping at... yes I thought he was immune, I was hoping everyone that had had it was immune . What's wrong with that? ...with 99% of viruses that's the case so it's not that way out to think this would be the case.
Personally I think YOU are wrong with your reduced immunity theory. Its been shown there are 2 strains, that you've had one become immune to that then caught the other.
The 2nd infection presenting as asymptomatic.
He is the first recovered person I've heard of that has had to isolate again.
As you say the virus has only been around for a year so mosthat people are confused as to its virulence.... Except you armchair experts obviously.