FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Closed Thread |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-03-2021, 09:37 AM | #876 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
12-03-2021, 09:44 AM | #877 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
You stated TWICE above that you think he's 100% right! I love seeing personal growth on Tibb . It's so rare... Last edited by Toy Soldier; 12-03-2021 at 09:45 AM. |
||
12-03-2021, 09:50 AM | #878 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Could the reporter not be said to have slandered the royal family with that very specific, direct question / suggestion ?? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
12-03-2021, 10:01 AM | #879 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
E.g. "Based on what Harry said was asked about the baby, that family member was being racist" - not defamation on the part of the person saying "it's racist", even if it's not true, the defamation case would be against Harry not the person responding to his claim. In short; if William has a legal case for slander, it's against Harry not against anyone asking questions about what Harry said. Interesting to note also that it is specifically against Harry, not Meghan or both of them, as they both say Meghan was not there when the comment was made, thus she is only repeating what she's been told by Harry. |
||
12-03-2021, 10:02 AM | #880 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
"chase or construct a story based on what sells and generates revenue for them" it would appear that he doth project too much “The things we dislike most in others are the characteristics we like least in ourselves.” Marian Keyes |
|||
12-03-2021, 10:04 AM | #881 | ||
|
|||
-
|
As an afterthought, I've just realised that no one has ever implied that William was present when the comment was made, so it's actually all moot: he doesn't know either way and can only share an opinion. He doesn't know what was said if he wasn't there.
|
||
12-03-2021, 10:09 AM | #882 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
When will the rest of the Royals learn such skills? Stuck in the mid 20th century the poor buggers. I guess that's what happens when you have a 94 year old monarch. Time to either pull the plug, or skip over Charles and allow William and Kate to modernise the institution. He'll welcome Harry back with open arms after dragging The Firm kicking and screaming into the 2020's. A fairytale ending. Last edited by Toy Soldier; 12-03-2021 at 10:11 AM. |
||
12-03-2021, 10:13 AM | #883 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Well we dont know the context of the comment....whether William was there or not he knows his family well enough to know if they are not Racist. |
|||
12-03-2021, 10:15 AM | #884 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Just for clarity, I am aware that comments can be taken in different context by different people in the same conversation so am not saying I believe it 100% as its all about perception.
__________________
|
|||
12-03-2021, 10:17 AM | #885 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I dont think he will welcome Harry back with open arms....lets not forget they were not on good terms when Harry set off to Canada...and this interview will have made things much worse, especially dragging his wife's name through the mud.. |
|||
12-03-2021, 10:24 AM | #886 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd even be kind and say that whoever made the comment probably did so when it was just close family around and thought Harry would see the "dark humour" in it, not realising that most people don't see the funny side when it comes to joking about their spouse and potential children. |
||
12-03-2021, 10:29 AM | #887 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
How you can frame that as a "dragging through the mud" I have no idea. Again hearing what you want to hear, I guess? I would say they were quite careful to be generally kind about William and Kate, AND The Queen. Again I'd say it's fairly evident that Harry's issues are with Charles and the "Royal management team" but he's taken this stance of not being too specific which is causing confusion. |
||
12-03-2021, 10:32 AM | #888 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
Your second paragraph I wholly would support. I'd like to think that could all happen. Equally that's my criticism of the present Queen, after 69 years of her reign. Nothing really has altered to drag the Monarchy as being more representative of the modern age. Stuck in rigid tradition, of stifling and straitjacket type rules, termed duty. I wonder what will happen next year if the Queen is still the Monarch. It will be an incredible Landmark of a full 70 years reign. They cannot demand Prince Harry and Meghan attend any function or events. However it will be interesting to see what happens. Or even if they are asked to. It is under a year off yet I guess. It's doubtful however there'll ever be another Monarch in place for a period of 70 years. |
||
12-03-2021, 10:42 AM | #889 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
I do think there's a good chance William will be "King by 50" anyway. Not to be too blunt but... Well... Charles does not look as healthy as The Queen did at 72, put it that way. Last edited by Toy Soldier; 12-03-2021 at 10:43 AM. |
||
12-03-2021, 11:04 AM | #890 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Is CharleyBoy still talking to plants ?? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
12-03-2021, 11:16 AM | #891 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
12-03-2021, 11:24 AM | #892 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Old hat. Do many read articles by respected royal reporters and correspondents inside the tabloids and broadsheets? (the tabloid articles are often taken from the broadsheet articles and the authors quoted. I particularly admire Camilla Tominey (daily telegraph and ‘call on’ for news channels and Penny Junor (usually broadsheet) and for the Mail, Richard Kay, who was a close friend of Diana’s for many years even though he was a reporter. They are all monarchists of course, which is why I like them, but they are also fair and don’t write in the ‘sensationalistic type way. They give insight into whatever the latest story is - whether it’s likely or not, and what they have been informed about it. For example, Penny, Richard, and others like Jenny Bond reported extensively on Diana from when she got engaged to when she died. People were saying “How could they possibly know that, what rubbish’! that in the fullness of time an unbelievable amount turned out to be the absolute truth. I know, because I read it all then just as I read about H&M now. |
||
12-03-2021, 11:37 AM | #893 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
12-03-2021, 11:48 AM | #894 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I feel the same about the press,but it doesn't seem to be them getting the backlash the Royal Family are imo the tabloid fodder press are scum.
__________________
RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
12-03-2021, 11:57 AM | #895 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
the press don't care who they point a finger at, it's the story/any story thats important. None of the revelations are any big deal to the public, it shouldnt even warrant a news item let alone a 2+ hour tv interview
It's the biggest non event in the last 5 years in my humble opinion |
|||
12-03-2021, 11:57 AM | #896 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I was always a skeptic when it came to stupid sensational headlines. But as usual you post a childish baity response and ignore the rest of my post which explains my stance.
|
||
12-03-2021, 12:01 PM | #897 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
1) seemingly not understand why Harry and Meghan wanted to get away from it (even if you think that's impossible) and 2) seemingly believe every sensationalist headline you read about Meghan Markle. |
||
12-03-2021, 12:09 PM | #898 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
2. I don't believe sensational headlines, I read articles from respected people to get nearer to the truth (read my post about this, you seem to have just read the first few lines.) |
||
12-03-2021, 12:10 PM | #899 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
SIR – If the Duke of Sussex, in his position of wealth and privilege, was
incapable of getting support for himself and his wife, what kind of ambassador can he be for the cause of mental health? A P Lodge Winchester, Hampshire Source: DT 12.3.21 |
|||
12-03-2021, 12:14 PM | #900 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Closed Thread |
|
|