[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Use your noggin Cherie, most of Harry's pals are still active military they're not going to speak out against the Sovereign Head of the Armed Forces ffs

Yes they are serving their country so they ain’t got nothing in common with Harry any more

All Harry does these days is serve the tea when meghans friends pop round.

[thesheriff443]

So Meghan and Harry’s marriage certificate has been seen for the first time and it proves that she was talking bollox when she said they married three days before in their back garden.

Like so much of what she said was made up crap to suit their story of being victims without voices or the ability to get any help

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Use your noggin Cherie, most of Harry's pals are still active military they're not going to speak out against the Sovereign Head of the Armed Forces ffs

So he has no friends from his school days...okay that’s weird, are you saying he only has friends from his army days, a quick google will dispel that for you

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Use your noggin Cherie, most of Harry's pals are still active military they're not going to speak out against the Sovereign Head of the Armed Forces ffs

Very strong valid point indeed.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

"It is TERRIBLE for Meghan and Harry to speak about this!"

"What if William does it?"

"Oh that is fine."

"Why??"

"Because YAY WILLIAM!"


... actual footage of the mental gymnastics required to make it "disgusting" that Harry and Meghan said a phonecall was unproductive, but "totally fine" that William has called them insulting and disrespectful:



Really just confirmation that all of these debates have NOTHING to do with ANYTHING other than unquestioning dogmatic allegiance to the Monarchy, which really makes these threads completely and utterly pointless. Arguing points that just don't matter when it all it really comes down to is "because THE QUEEN" or "because WILLIAM FUTURE KING". Honestly just nonsense at this point... nothing but a display of rampant loyalism. I knew there was orange on my radar, should have gone with my instincts .

Rampant loyalism

As I said before:
So you are saying that Meghan and Harry can say what they want, when they want about the royals, but the royals should never answer back with what they feel about it? ...I didn't think these H&M threads could get any sillier, but how wrong I was...
You seem upset/angry TS?

[jet]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Yes they are serving their country so they ain’t got nothing in common with Harry any more

All Harry does these days is serve the tea when meghans friends pop round.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

H& M are saying how they feel too

The information Meghan relayed to her broadcaster friend were not feelings...they were an insight into how a private conversation went between her husband and his family....this is the woman who demands that her private conversations remain private.
This is the first time William has passed comment on his feelings on the matter...it doesn’t compare to the endless interviews H&M have spent spouting theirs.

[GoldHeart]

Does anyone else see the contractions I'm seeing whilst the narrative of Harry changes daily .

Is he under the thumb serving tea as Meghan bullies him ?
Or is he the nazi costume wearer who throws his family under the bus ? .

Make up your mind

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Yes they are serving their country

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

So Meghan and Harry’s marriage certificate has been seen for the first time and it proves that she was talking bollox when she said they married three days before in their back garden.

Like so much of what she said was made up crap to suit their story of being victims without voices or the ability to get any help

Yup....one of many ‘untruths’...

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Does anyone else see the contractions I'm seeing whilst the narrative of Harry changes daily .

Is he under the thumb serving tea as Meghan bullies him ?
Or is he the nazi costume wearer who throws his family under the bus ? .

Make up your mind

Just like how Meghan is a master manipulator but also a terrible actress at the same time.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Just like how Meghan is a master manipulator but also a terrible actress at the same time.

Confusing really Lol

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Yup....one of many ‘untruths’...

She's a compulsive liar, and she did it with the knowledge that the Royals 'never complain, never explain'. Same with spilling the private conversation, she thought there would be no comeback.
Good for William for saying how he felt about it, though like Meghan, some think he should just keep his mouth shut. The nerve of him!

[Marsh.]

No conversation has been spilled.

You saying it does not change that.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Cherie

So he has no friends from his school days...okay that’s weird, are you saying he only has friends from his army days, a quick google will dispel that for you

A quick google should also clear up that “most of” does not mean “all”, if the concept is confusing. It means a large percentage of, or the majority of. If I had meant all, I would have said all.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by jet

Rampant loyalism

As I said before:
So you are saying that Meghan and Harry can say what they want, when they want about the royals, but the royals should never answer back with what they feel about it? ...I didn't think these H&M threads could get any sillier, but how wrong I was...
You seem upset/angry TS?

No jet I’m saying that Harry and Meghan can say what they want AND William can say what he wants, because neither is bigger nor cleverer nor more important than the other. I’m not the one with double standards. I would just at least like some sort of consistency - condemning one whilst excusing the other is (again) demonstrative of bias and at this point, as I said,it’s pretty clear that these threads are not really discussions so much as just watching people barf up pro-monarchy propaganda.

I’m angry because I don’t like wasting my time locking horns with zealots.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Does anyone else see the contractions I'm seeing whilst the narrative of Harry changes daily .

Is he under the thumb serving tea as Meghan bullies him ?
Or is he the nazi costume wearer who throws his family under the bus ? .

Make up your mind

Meghan gets what Meghan wants....she is all he has and sadly he is throwing his family under the bus to keep her happy. Your comparison is ridiculous...the Nazi uniform wearer came into play when they played the racist card...

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Meghan gets what Meghan wants....she is all he has and sadly he is throwing his family under the bus to keep her happy. Your comparison is ridiculous...the Nazi uniform wearer came into play when they played the racist card...

Just more misogynistic nonsense,the old trope of the evil battleaxe wife and the poor, powerless, controlled hubby under the thumb of a nasty woman. Gross and shameful.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Meghan gets what Meghan wants....she is all he has and sadly he is throwing his family under the bus to keep her happy. Your comparison is ridiculous...the Nazi uniform wearer came into play when they played the racist card...

But that's like accusing Wills of being under Kate's thumb .

My comparison stands ,as the nazi costume was only dug up to fit a narrative. Why wasn't it brought up before Oprah or even before he met Meghan.

Harry has his own mind , and as I keep saying I think he's been wanting to step away for a long time. When you're in a relationship / married surely you make decisions together. Or is Harry too stupid ? and is Meghan too manipulative ? .

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Just more misogynistic nonsense,the old trope of the evil battleaxe wife and the poor, powerless, controlled hubby under the thumb of a nasty woman. Gross and shameful.

Can someone check if Mrs soldier is using ts’s account

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No jet I’m saying that Harry and Meghan can say what they want AND William can say what he wants, because neither is bigger nor cleverer nor more important than the other. I’m not the one with double standards. I would just at least like some sort of consistency - condemning one whilst excusing the other is (again) demonstrative of bias and at this point, as I said,it’s pretty clear that these threads are not really discussions so much as just watching people barf up pro-monarchy propaganda.

I’m angry because I don’t like wasting my time locking horns with zealots.

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Just more misogynistic nonsense,the old trope of the evil battleaxe wife and the poor, powerless, controlled hubby under the thumb of a nasty woman. Gross and shameful.

60,000 Meghan threads summed up succinctly.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

But that's like accusing Wills of being under Kate's thumb .

My comparison stands ,as the nazi costume was only dug up to fit a narrative. Why wasn't it brought up before Oprah or even before he met Meghan.

Harry has his own mind , and as I keep saying I think he's been wanting to step away for a long time. When you're in a relationship / married surely you make decisions together. Or is Harry too stupid ? and is Meghan too manipulative ? .

As if anyone on the planet believes it was Harry’s idea to live in America in celebrity central.

Harry’s idea was to live in Africa in a mud hut and drive an elephant to work.

[Marsh.]

Yeah, Harry didn't want America so he didn't marry an American woman.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yeah, Harry didn't want America so he didn't marry an American woman.

Or move to America

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

You are so wrong... its not just in the DM.
You must think she's a fluffy soft little granny figure who is tolerating what these 2 are doing. Never underestimate the Queen, ever!

Rags are rags.

I don't think anything when it comes to the royals, I just go off their direct statements because I'm not a crazy person who thinks they know the inner workings of a family I'm not part of based on dubious rags with a bone to pick.

Originally Posted by jet

BS.

Nothing about what I said is BS. You are heavily engaged in strawman arguments and confirmation bias.

A strawman argument is 'an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.' In this case, you're making out that criticising people for not finding fault with this story when they criticised Meghan for a similar story a while ago are somehow saying that Harry and Meghan can say what they want while the royals cannot, something that is false to anyone with basic reading comprehension.

I will continue to point out the flaws in your arguments while they continue to be ever present and fatal to what you are trying to say.