[Kizzy]

No it shouldn't ... there was only one concelation. .. I tell myself it was my money that paid for the nails in her coffin.

[jet]

When Corbyn pops off, I'm displeased that I won't get the chance to pay for the nails in his coffin.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Swan

It's very fair to say both isn't right. Harry and Megan shouldn't be getting taxpayers money for anything, nor should Thatcher's funeral be paid for by it.

Ok atleast you're being consistent Swan .But others still think it's ok for one and not ok for another which is hypocrisy.

And I think it was a bigger slap, and bigger kick in the face for people to pay for Thatcher's funeral. Considering she didn't give a damn about the poor or working class, people are still affected TODAY no thanks to her.

Atleast Meghan and Harry don't affect our lives, or increase gas & electricity prices . Or make cuts to services we essentially need.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Ok atleast you're being consistent Swan .But others still think it's ok for one and not ok for another which is hypocrisy.

And I think it was a bigger slap, and bigger kick in the face for people to pay for Thatcher's funeral. Considering she didn't give a damn about the poor or working class, people are still affected TODAY no thanks to her.

Atleast Meghan and Harry don't affect our lives, or increase gas & electricity prices . Or make cuts to services we essentially need.

That's true. But don't you think they have a bit of brass neck, quitting as Royals (fine, whatever) but then expecting the Taxpayer to fund their security for their visits back here? And considering the amount of money they've got. How can that possibly be defended and justified?

They want their cake and to eat it too, there's nothing else to it.

[Liam-]

Harry has consistently said they would personally pay for the royal level security themselves though, so I can’t really see how people can say they just want to scrounge from the taxpayer

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Swan

That's true. But don't you think they have a bit of brass neck, quitting as Royals (fine, whatever) but then expecting the Taxpayer to fund their security for their visits back here? And considering the amount of money they've got. How can that possibly be defended and justified?

They want their cake and to eat it too, there's nothing else to it.

Yeah but they're still the Queen's family , nothing changes that. I think they just want stronger security especially now they have children to protect.

I'm not really that invested enough to care . But didn't Harry originally want to pay for security or something a while back? . Or am I thinking of something else .

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Harry has consistently said they would personally pay for the royal level security themselves though, so I can’t really see how people can say they just want to scrounge from the taxpayer

Inconsiderate bitter little **** better not get one cucumber sandwich from my tax input.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Harry has consistently said they would personally pay for the royal level security themselves though, so I can’t really see how people can say they just want to scrounge from the taxpayer

This
I knew I DIDN'T imagine it ,I've just said the same thing .

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yeah but they're still the Queen's family , nothing changes that. I think they just want stronger security especially now they have children to protect.

I'm not really that invested enough to care . But didn't Harry originally want to pay for security or something a while back? . Or am I thinking of something else .

Not that invested to care.....

No offence goldheart, I do enjoy your posts, and that is why I noticed that this and politic threads are the only ones you seem invested in, on TIBB.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Harry has consistently said they would personally pay for the royal level security themselves though, so I can’t really see how people can say they just want to scrounge from the taxpayer

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yeah but they're still the Queen's family , nothing changes that. I think they just want stronger security especially now they have children to protect.

I'm not really that invested enough to care . But didn't Harry originally want to pay for security or something a while back? . Or am I thinking of something else .

Then they should let him pay for it and just get on with it all. As long as it doesn't affect the Taxpayer then who cares.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Harry has consistently said they would personally pay for the royal level security themselves though, so I can’t really see how people can say they just want to scrounge from the taxpayer

He was a member of the Royal family for long enough to know darn well that Royal level security from the Met police cannot be bought. His offer to pay was a cynical ploy to once again be seen as a victim.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by jet

He was a member of the Royal family for long enough to know darn well that Royal level security from the Met police cannot be bought. His offer to pay was a cynical ploy to once again be seen as a victim.

So once again you prove that Harry can't win no matter what he does .
You know what he might aswell go around in the Riddler's outfit ,with a cane and smoke a pipe going "na na na I'm using tax payers money " .

[jet]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

So once again you prove that Harry can't win no matter what he does .
You know what he might aswell go around in the Riddler's outfit ,with a cane and smoke a pipe going "na na na I'm using tax payers money " .

Oh he could have won - he would have benefited from the high level security already around any occasion involving the Royal family which is good enough for them and all their children.
He and Meghan managed to attend the Invictus games in the Netherlands and a swift visit to the Queen in the VERY dangerous UK without high level Royal security.
But no, he had to make waves as usual. Tiresome self entitled little twerp.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

So once again you prove that Harry can't win no matter what he does .
You know what he might aswell go around in the Riddler's outfit ,with a cane and smoke a pipe going "na na na I'm using tax payers money " .

it's not a matter of "cant win" the royal protection service simply is not available for hire, it's not a private business, so when he said he wanted to pay for it, it was said in the knowledge that the service could not be purchased. He is not that stupid

[parmnion]

What does he find so scary in the uk?

His uncle got blew up in Ireland, his mom died in paris..

Whays so scary about the uk harry?

[jet]

Originally Posted by parmnion

What does he find so scary in the uk?

His uncle got blew up in Ireland, his mom died in paris..

Whays so scary about the uk harry?

It's just an excuse when they don't want to come (they only want to come when the Netflix camera's can come with them .)

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

It's just an excuse when they don't want to come (they only want to come when the Netflix camera's can come with them .)

Says who?

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Says who?

Says Jet obviously

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Says Jet obviously

So just biased assumptions as usual then

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

So just biased assumptions as usual then

is that your biased opinion?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yeah but they're still the Queen's family , nothing changes that. I think they just want stronger security especially now they have children to protect.

I'm not really that invested enough to care . But didn't Harry originally want to pay for security or something a while back? . Or am I thinking of something else .

They wanted to pay for Royal Protection…nothing else. It’s completely different.

[parmnion]

Will she run for presidency in 2028?

[arista]

Exclusive: Sister's bid to make Duchess give video evidence

[arista]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

Not Thomas upstaging the Queen by pegging during the Jubilee weekend .