FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
27-05-2022, 11:58 AM | #926 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 12:01 PM | #927 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Yeah some of the fan base is aggressive and a lot of comments are just uncalled for and disgusting... Then you'll have people, like myself, no fan of either who has formed an opinion based on evidence. Would that just not be standard? To keep them confidential for a period of time? She has admitted she wrote the op-ed and when you look at the timing of it how could it be about anyone else? |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 12:02 PM | #928 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 12:04 PM | #929 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 12:09 PM | #930 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
The question is, is there enough doubt to say that what she wrote could be true. She does not have to prove that it IS true, there only has to be enough to say that it COULD be true. We are in big, biiig trouble if people can no longer speak out about abuse without fear of being sued for libel unless they have "concrete" proof. The facts of the case are incredibly basic... - They clearly had a messy, violent and controlling relationship all round (recorded evidence of both being manipulative, controlling and aggressive) - She wrote about a messy relationship ...it's not libel. They had a messy relationship. And in terms of damages against him - they'd have been FAR less if he'd just left it all alone, but he didn't he tried to sue The Sun (and failed) and that opened a massive can of worms that led to this. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 12:13 PM | #931 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Here's how it SHOULD work, imo, if he truly has lost earnings because of what she wrote.
1) She should be allowed to have her say. 2) He can dispute it and give his side in the press, too. 3) It's down to the studios/employers who they believe and what they do with that information 4) If the studio ditches someone because of an unproven accusation and that person feels that to be wholly unjustified, they should then sue the studio/employer for making that decision i.e. unfair dismissal. The only reason it's complicated in Hollywood is because the studio's bottom line depends on the image and popularity of the actor. But there shouldn't be different rules on whistleblowing just "because it's an actor and their image in more important than for most people". Last edited by Toy Soldier; 27-05-2022 at 12:14 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 01:03 PM | #932 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
I think it's started.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 02:09 PM | #933 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 02:21 PM | #934 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 02:24 PM | #935 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 02:37 PM | #936 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Shes been good tv, BB coming back soon.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:22 PM | #937 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Last edited by Toy Soldier; 27-05-2022 at 03:23 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:24 PM | #938 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Proof in the pudding....and what a pudding she is.
Thank you camille, you just blew it. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:30 PM | #939 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:36 PM | #940 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Amazing how you ignore all the mistakes & slip ups from AH & her legal team though.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:46 PM | #941 | ||
|
|||
-
|
In terms of the legal process the entire thing has been an absolute circus all round (both teams) - from Depp's lawyer leaking info and getting kicked out of the trial, to bad questioning, to Camille in general (who is somehow lauded as this ace lawyer when she's been sarcastic and unprofessional throughout, playing up to giggling onlookers in the peanut gallery like Depp himself, so likely a deliberate tactic). Heard's lawyer seems nervous and under-confident when she should have been fighting fire with fire. All utter rubbish.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:51 PM | #942 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Plenty to say about me though!! Bog off. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:52 PM | #943 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And she has accused witnesses of only coming forward to get their ' 15 minutes of fame'. I would rather have Depp's team than Heard's who seem to play dirty when they're losing. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 03:54 PM | #944 | |||
|
||||
Zumi Zimi Zami
|
please no, she needs to be locked up in a isolation cell and the key thrown away
a mentally ill woman like her is a danger to society her on CBB would make me not follow that until she's evicted
__________________
Taking part in Strictly Jake's Tibb does Strictly Game. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:02 PM | #945 | ||
|
|||
-
|
You realise that this has been a huge part of Camille's tactic too, right? There have been literally thousands of memes about it (celebrating it).
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:02 PM | #946 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Describing it as "unwatchable" is an interesting choice of words, too. Is this reality TV to you?
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:04 PM | #947 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
Do you see and take this as real life or do you see and take it as a television drama?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:05 PM | #948 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:06 PM | #949 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
But overall I hate the constant OBJECTIONS, who ever is doing it ,as it makes the trial nearly unwatchable. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2022, 04:06 PM | #950 | |||
|
||||
Zumi Zimi Zami
|
Amber ''Ratface'' Heard
gross looking evil woman
__________________
Taking part in Strictly Jake's Tibb does Strictly Game. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|