[Redway]

Sometimes I wish there was an actual Big Brother house specifically for TiBB members to assemble face-to-face and settle their differences.

Make it happen, Davina.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yeah why are they trying to say it was recorded .

Well a transcript is a written or recorded document of events….maybe writing it herself was a transcript…if she wrote it herself are we to believe it was true

[Redway]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well a transcript is a written or recorded document of events….maybe writing it herself was a transcript…if she wrote it herself are we to believe it was true

‘She recorded the dialogue so must have went into Buckingham Palace with a motive to bully and intimidate an old lady. Shame on Marlene.’

‘She wrote down the transcript herself. In the absence of actual recording, how are we to believe a word of it?’

This poor woman just can’t win.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Redway

Eventually one has to go off, eat rice, drink wine and moan about Corrie but there’s something about your ignorance (assuming you’re not just baiting through-and-through) that’s got me glued. For all the wrong reasons, obviously.

Keep making cheap jibes

Keep losing

Biff

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Swan

Yeah it's wrong, and still goes on here, that's a Islamic trait in the UK. Some Muslims aren't willing to budge on that one here.

No, i don't think straight people feel excluded, i think most want equality for all in this country. I feel we celebrate LGBTQ more than most, if not any other country in the western world (the east aren't there yet, middle east kill gay people).

A minority means what it means, if you're referring to their countries. Look up "minority". A brown person might be oppressed in their own country, they're not a minority though!

So you're ok with LGBTQ charities? ,but you take issue with charities focusing on black & Asian women?.

What if there was a charity that started only focusing on domestic male victims? , I personally think that would also be a good thing..... aswell as domestic abuse charities for women .

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Swan

They are not minorities in their own countries. We buy into this ideology that black and brown are people are minorities. They not, at all, only in the western world. Not in their native countries.

And that's the sad irony, all that vile sh!t goes on in their own countries, not ours, that's why they come here, to avoid all that.

The UK aint so bad!!

Certain black people have been living in Liverpool (brought against their will owing to the slave-trade) for the past 350 years (and that’s not even the half of it). Did you know that?

[Swan]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

So you're ok with LGBTQ charities? ,but you take issue with charities focusing on black & Asian women?.

What if there was a charity that started only focusing on domestic male victims? , I personally think that would also be a good thing..... aswell as domestic abuse charities for women .

What are you on about??? When have i said im against charities for black and asian women?

Are you sure you have the right poster? And yeah it would be a GREAT THING!

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Redway

‘She recorded the dialogue so must have went into Buckingham Palace with a motive to bully and intimidate an old lady. Shame on Marlene.’

‘She wrote down the transcript herself. In the absence of actual recording, how are we to believe a word of it?’

This poor woman just can’t win.

I suppose you have to question why she accepted the invite to Buckingham Palace in the first place since she firmly believes that the Royals are Racists….did Camilla not host the gathering…Camilla being the in-law that Racially abused Meghan?
The lady apologised if she caused offence but she doesn’t accept the apology…it appears she can’t win either

[Alf]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

So you're ok with LGBTQ charities? ,but you take issue with charities focusing on black & Asian women?.

What if there was a charity that started only focusing on domestic male victims? , I personally think that would also be a good thing..... aswell as domestic abuse charities for women .

Let’s be honest, a charity that excludes people based on the colour of their skin are a bit racist, are they not?

If there was a charity that specifically excluded everyone who wasn't White, then that charity would be seen as racist, and rightly so.

[Redway]

You could also argue, Swan, that the indigenous English of-yore have had a penchant for colonising and stealing gold, tea, curry, technology and the like to get away from the empty barrenness that by-and-large is the British Isles in its rawest form.

But the U.K. ain’t so bad, right?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

So you're ok with LGBTQ charities? ,but you take issue with charities focusing on black & Asian women?.

What if there was a charity that started only focusing on domestic male victims? , I personally think that would also be a good thing..... aswell as domestic abuse charities for women .

….and what if they were for just white men and women…would that be acceptable?

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It’s an old woman having a conversation

Regardless of what was said or what can be proven

She didn’t pull out a knife and start stabbing all the African guests or were ever the fcuk they are from.

Tbf I don't think that anyone on here has advocated for her to be arrested, because the hypothetical scenario that you've came up with would warrant a lengthy Prison sentence.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Alf

Let’s be honest, a charity that excludes people based on the colour of their skin are a bit racist, are they not?

If there was a charity that specifically excluded everyone who wasn't White, then that charity would be seen as racist, and rightly so.

Reverse-racism and the lack of its actual existence are the key terms. White people are not an “oppressed minority” in the West (if they were in the past - excluding Eastern Europeans - it would be the Irish and I actually support them potentially still having specific federations to them in the U.K. that are tailored to their specific needs, if they need it) so by-and-large don’t need don’t need specific protection/resources merely because of the colour of their skin. Some things are better-understood by someone of the same race/background and that’s just how it is.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Redway

You could also argue, Swan, that the indigenous English of-yore have had a penchant for colonising and stealing gold, tea, curry, technology and the like to get away from the empty barrenness that by-and-large is the British Isles in its rawest form.

But the U.K. ain’t so bad, right?

Sounds like you're suggesting that this constant demonising of White people as racists is done as revenge for colonialism?

By the the way, many ethnicities have played their part in colonising in history.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Redway

You could also argue, Swan, that the indigenous English of-yore have had a penchant for colonising and stealing gold, tea, curry, technology and the like to get away from the empty barrenness that by-and-large is the British Isles in its rawest form.

But the U.K. ain’t so bad, right?

Nope, it isn't. Have you seen the struggle of those "poc" trying to get here in the past 20 years? Moving past NON war torn countries?

Lets not step back over 100 years Redway. I don't wanna embarrass you yet again, in the same night, and in the same thread.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

….and what if they were for just white men and women…would that be acceptable?

but there is charities where the people getting help are predominantly white.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

but there is charities where the people getting help are predominantly white.

Name ONE? And prove the predominately WHITE aspect. ONE charity that favours whites in this country????

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Swan

Nope, it isn't. Have you seen the struggle of those "poc" trying to get here in the past 20 years? Moving past NON war torn countries?

Lets not step back over 100 years Redway. I don't wanna embarrass you yet again, in the same night, and in the same thread.

I didn’t realise I was being embarrassed in the first place. Maybe I just don’t take you seriously enough for any of your posts to really dawn on me in any particular emotive kind of way.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Alf

Let’s be honest, a charity that excludes people based on the colour of their skin are a bit racist, are they not?

If there was a charity that specifically excluded everyone who wasn't White, then that charity would be seen as racist, and rightly so.

It has nothing to do with exclusion . You don't have an issue with children in need only focusing on UK children......do you??.

And you don't have issue with LGBTQ charities do you ?.

Or what about female domestic charities in general?, When there's male domestic abuse victims.

[Redway]

As one recalls you threatened to embarrass me after I made a dead line about turkey but really it was just a case of going ’round in circles. (Swan.)

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

but there is charities where the people getting help are predominantly white.

But they are not just for white people

If they were there would be uproar….do you not get my point?

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Redway

I didn’t realise I was being embarrassed in the first place. Maybe I just don’t take you seriously enough for any of your posts to really dawn on me in any particular emotive kind of way.

You don't read my posts, you were arguing against me a point i agreed with you on earlier.

Because as per, you have it in your head im against you, when in reality (look it up and find it, reality is something that'll help you in particular no end) im not against you at all. You just choose not to accept a difference of opinion because you can't handle it!

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Redway

As one recalls you threatened to embarrass me after I made a dead line about turkey but really it was just a case of going ’round in circles. (Swan.)

Read my other post you moron (i'll take a ban for it, because this guy doesn't address anything i say, would take a ban for integrity over Redway's blatant ignorance)

[Redway]

Delete.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Swan

You don't read my posts, you were arguing against me a point i agreed with you on earlier.

Because as per, you have it in your head im against you, when in reality (look it up and find it, reality is something that'll help you in particular no end) im not against you at all. You just choose not to accept a difference of opinion because you can't handle it!

I’m not that paranoid. I just don’t stand for racism-apologetics and I expressed a fact (I don’t consider being anti-racism even an opinion any more than fact) but because you didn’t like what I was saying you resorted to embarrassing yourself by threatening to embarrass me for disagreeing with you. If you think someone has a victim-complex with you just because what they’re saying isn’t in alignment with you I’d re-evaluate the purpose of expressing a contrary ‘opinion.’