[Zizu]

As per title


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

29 of Dec
it was a tiny amount.


No one was harmed

[arista]

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by arista

29 of Dec
it was a tiny amount.


No one was harmed

Tiny amount ?

Says who ?

Can we believe anything the authorities say these days ?

The fact that a shipment of plutonium even reached our shores and was supposedly destined for an Iranian owned but UK based company is absolutely shocking imho !!

Can you imagine what would happen if the tables were turned and a UK owned company were set to get a plutonium shipment to their factory based in Iran !??!?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

"Iranian owned but UK based company"


MI5 are looking into it.
I think there may have been a box on
top of the metal bit.


Could be from Iran, and Pakistan.

The staff on that day were on strike
But they say enough staff were there.

So was a box on top of that metal,
taken away?

[arista]

[Tiny amount ?

Says who ?]


The Head of Counter-Intelligence
on TV news

[bots]

we are at far greater danger of russia lobbing a barrage of nukes at us at the moment, so it's not particularly high on my agenda. Also, it's easy as pie to track anyone with nuclear material

[The Slim Reaper]

This thread is just Arista trying to put people off the scent.

[The Slim Reaper]

The country is just trying to go back to a time before brexit.

[arista]

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

we are at far greater danger of russia lobbing a barrage of nukes at us at the moment, so it's not particularly high on my agenda. Also, it's easy as pie to track anyone with nuclear material

I reckon a terrorist dirty bomb is slightly more plausible than a barrage of Russian nukes, on balance.

The main difference is, the Russians could do it at any time but don't, whereas a terrorist cell WOULD do it at any time but can't.

I feel like the means to do it for the latter is more likely to change than the reasons not to for the former.