FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#2026 | |||
|
||||
Beso
|
Ooo dont push me.....
Former soldier Peter Beard, 43, was sentenced to two-and-a-half years after pushing aggressively at police as they tried to protect a hotel housing asylum seekers. The judge called his case "astonishing" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2027 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The Thug who pushed the
Fire in the bin at the Hotel. Jailed for 9 years Thomas Birly his name SkyNewsHD Live Last edited by arista; 06-09-2024 at 05:05 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2028 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2029 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
Ex-Labour councillor Ricky Jones pleads not guilty over 'cut their throats'
speech during riots ![]() https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-b1180481.html |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2030 | |||
|
||||
Beso
|
Quote:
Yes, these are the ones that need jailed.. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2031 | |||
|
||||
Beso
|
Quote:
Lies lies lies(typical labour)..we all saw and heard you...lock him up. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2032 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
No he is Guilty he said LIVE on TV news |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2033 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
pleading not guilty when there is hard evidence to the contrary only increases the punishment they receive when found guilty
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2034 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2035 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2036 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
The Metropolitan Police “didn’t get everything right” and could have made arrests sooner when policing recent large-sale protests, the force’s assistant commissioner has said.
Matt Twist, who is responsible for protest and public order policing across London, also said the force used an “infinite number of tiers of policing” in response to criticisms of the Met adopting a ‘two-tier’ stance. In an interview with think tank Policy Exchange in May, Matt Twist said: “When we look back at the policing of protests over the last eight months, we know we didn’t get everything right – particularly in the early stages in October. “On occasion we did not move quickly to make arrests, for example the man chanting for ‘Jihad’ which was a decision made following fast time advice from lawyers and the CPS. “We are now much more focused on identifying reasonable grounds for arrest, acting where needed, and then investigating, so in these circumstances its very likely arrests would be made more quickly now.” https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/m...-b1180819.html Nice to see them admitting what we could all see with our own eyes, although this interview was last May and is only surfacing now?
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2037 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The 12-year-old boy's Mother did not return
from Ibiza to yesterday's court hearing. The Judge should Charge the Lad https://www.itv.com/news/granada/202...ring-for-ibiza |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2038 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
So it was true that they didn't have two tiers - but many more!
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2039 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
Jonathan Hall is right. A lack of swift clarity on the facts on the ground is a
dereliction of duty ![]() By MP Nigel Farage Six weeks on from the Southport attack in which three children were killed and a further eight were injured, along with two adults, sense is beginning to prevail. Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, gave a speech at a conference organised by the Counter Extremism Group think tank. In it, he spoke out against the danger of an “information vacuum” following such an atrocity. Hall said: “One of the problems and the consequences of the Southport attack was that there was an information gap, a vacuum, which was filled with false speculation”. He added: “I personally think that more information could have been put out safely without comprising potential criminal proceedings”. In taking this position, he was joined by another eminent lawyer, Lord Carlile of Berriew, who is a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation. Carlile said “I think we should get out more information if we possibly can. We have learned from these events that when somebody is arrested, and there was a potential issue like this arising, the police probably need to tell the media who has been arrested and what their background is.” I have no doubt that millions of others in Britain would agree with the common sense approach of Hall and Carlile. I know that I do, which is why I posted a video the day after the attack which was very much aligned with their opinion. It is worth repeating what I said in it, for as a result of it, I have been blamed personally for the riots which followed. Having expressed my horror at what had happened, I noted that Sir Keir Starmer was heckled when he visited the town. I then said: “It shows you how unhappy the public are with the state of law and order in our country. I have to say there are one or two questions. Was this guy being monitored by the security services? Some reports say he was, others are less sure. The police say it’s a non-terror incident, just as they said the stabbing of an Army Lieutenant Colonel in uniform on the streets of Kent the other day was a non-terror incident. I just wonder whether the truth is being withheld from us. I don’t know the answer to that, but I think it is a fair and legitimate question.” I also spoke with Valdo Calocane in mind. He killed three people in Nottingham in June 2023. It later came to light that he had a history of mental illness and was known to the authorities. Only last month it emerged that a doctor warned three years before the attacks that Calocane’s illness was so acute he could “end up killing someone.” As a result of misinformation about the Southport attacker that appeared online – which had nothing to do with me – the riots there spread to other parts of the country. In no way did I – or do I – condone that mindless thuggery. But children had been massacred. Members of the public were angry and fearful. As Lord Carlile has said, institutions had a responsibility to provide some details about the attacker in order to counter the internet rumours that helped to trigger the violence. This information could have been released in a way that did not compromise any future criminal trial. Instead, the public was kept in the dark. So was every media outlet. The only facts that anybody officially had to go on came via the bland statement (which has never been updated) put out by Merseyside Police on the evening of the attack, in which the force said a 17-year-old male who was born in Cardiff had been arrested. Three days after the attack, on 1 August, the suspect was named publicly for the first time as Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, after a judge at Liverpool Crown Court lifted reporting restrictions. But doesn’t this lack of swift clarity now look like a major dereliction of duty? Incredibly, as the riots took hold, many prominent individuals in politics and the media chose to leap on the fact that I had asked those perfectly legitimate questions in my video. In doing so, they set up a ludicrous narrative which blamed me personally for inciting the disorder. But with two legal experts now implying that the type of information which I asked about should have been forthcoming straight away, I wonder what Tom Tugendhat, James O’Brien, Trevor Phillips and the others who criticised me think now. Or do they disagree with the assessment of Hall and Carlile? My view is that Sir Keir Starmer – who, as he never tires of telling us, was the tough guy Director of Public Prosecutions for five years - bears a heavy responsibility for not ensuring that some authority was candid with the public at the earliest opportunity. For one thing, the information vacuum that had been created could have been filled by it being made clear that the perpetrator was not a Muslim, as had been rumoured online. Instead, nothing was added to that bland police statement. Starmer did make a speech from Downing Street about what had gone on in Southport, but he merely warned people not to prejudice the forthcoming prosecution. Does he really think the public didn’t have a right to know more about a crime like this? Is that a healthy state of affairs? Isn’t it the case that the active decision to keep the facts about the Southport killer from the public inflamed tensions? The boot is on the other foot now. The refusal to brief the media in a sensible way about the Southport attacker was an unforgivable mistake. Even Lord Carlile – a friend of Sir Keir Starmer – thinks so. For this reason it is absolutely necessary that Starmer is forced to explain why he thought it was a good idea for key information about the Southport attack to be withheld from the public. I, for one, will be doing my best to hold him to account on this. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...deserve-truth/ |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2040 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Update: [12-year-old boy, who hit the headlines because his mother chose to fly to Ibiza for a holiday the day before he was due in court. District Judge Joanne Hirst ordered her to appear at Manchester Magistrates’ Court after her sunshine break, where she ordered her to pay £1,200 compensation and go on a parenting course.] [The boy was given a 12-month referral order after admitting two counts of violent disorder, a measure designed to prevent him committing further crimes. “Sometimes the state, I’m afraid, has to intervene,” Mr Parkinson said. “And the consequence of an intervention like the 12-year-old is a referral order, which would then mean that rehabilitation can take place and we can divert them from the path of criminality. “That’s the objective with youngsters, not to criminalise them, it’s to put them on the right path. “We have people who are specially trained around youth work, because it’s important we do make the right decisions.”] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2041 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The 14-year-old, who was on the Riot
was marched to the police station by his parents, is sent home to them? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa...ents--DPP.html |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2042 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
60 days now and we have been told zero about motive etc why children were stabbed
5 weeks and the vermin men who attacked policewomen at Manchester airport have not been charged do you ever wonder why? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2043 | |||
|
||||
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Is it something to do with brown people getting preferential treatment and honkys being regarded as 55th class citizens?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2044 | |||
|
||||
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Was the 12 year old a concerned parent?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2045 | |||
|
||||
A fresh look, at Shell
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2046 | |||
|
||||
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Do you honestly have no concept of the fact you're actually the one doing constant culture war stuff? C'mon; there's no way you can't see it.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2047 | |||
|
||||
Schrödinger's Quato
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2048 | |||
|
||||
Beso
|
You are describing what starmer did.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2049 | |||
|
||||
Schrödinger's Quato
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2050 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
For the same reason the Rochdale rapists continued for sooooo long.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|