[Gusto Brunt]

Originally Posted by benthebbyapper

I just find it so irritating that the public keep relatively dull HM"s in the house and then proceed to complain when the show gets less entertaining. Michael seemed like he was becoming a good housemate, it's a shame as he was enjoying the experience

But it's always the dull housemates who carry the weighty nomination vote.

Hence they remain to the end.

But Michael, I think it was good he went but I wish it had been JoJo or that unknown woman who is trying to lose weight,

Michael was just the same every time I saw him. Seen five minutes of him, you've seen 50,000 minutes of him. He had nothing more to give.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

Michael was just the same every time I saw him. Seen five minutes of him, you've seen 50,000 minutes of him. He had nothing more to give.

This is my thoughts. If we were going by "who I think is a good person" I'd punt Micky Rourke to the fkn moon. Send him off to Mars in a faulty Elon rocket, not be disappointed if it malfunctions and takes him to Jupiter.

But if we're talking "good telly", which we should be with a reality TV show, I agree with the above - we had seen all there was to see of Michael. "If you've seen 5 minutes you've seen 50000 minutes" is a good way to put it. An interesting character to see - but we've seen him now and there's nothing more there.