[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

IF found guilty. Any decent lawyer would have been able to get her off on a jury trial.

Not under starmers commands they wouldn't..100 percent she would still be in jail if she had pled not guilty..probably at this moment in time just starting a legnthy sentence after spending months on remand awaiting trial.


She speaks about all this during the interview

[Cherie]

Anyway I am going to watch her interview with Allison when I get a chance and see how bright she is or isn't

[Glenn.]

Just remember you’re not measuring how ‘bright’ she is, you’re watching how well a convicted racist can perform when given a platform

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I've absolutely no time for this woman whatsoever.
Not one scrap.

She's definitely giving off a bad vibe associating herself with Dan Wootton.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

This woman got far less for posting it was acceptable to burn human beings alive in a building, from her prejudice against those people.

Yet she gets support.
That really speaks volumes that this Country is really going into dangerously ugly prejudiced depths.

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

The problem there is how little the legsl system regards rape victims.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

No they did not just chop a tree down

That is both silly and trying to deflect for nefarious reasons

A very poorly put tactic

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

The problem there is how little the legsl system regards rape victims.

Too true.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

No they did not just chop a tree down

That is both silly and trying to deflect for nefarious reasons

A very poorly put tactic

But if I remember correctly, weren't the Tree dying anyway?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

But if I remember correctly, weren't the Tree dying anyway?

Would you smother your Gran because she was ill?

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

Would you smother your Gran because she was ill?

No.

But James Sunderland might.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

It was a special tree in a special place admittedly Mock
However yes, both got 4 years for that.

I guess if this woman had said burn alive others not of other countries or cultures, then she'd be more universally condemned.
However because she said from her prejudice it would be fine to burn alive some humans from other countries and cultures.
She's more a heroine to some in the UK now.

That to me is far more worrying than the loss of a tree.
You can plant another tree, you cannot bring back to life anyone burned alive.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

It was a special tree in a special place admittedly Mock
However yes, both got 4 years for that.

I guess if this woman had said burn alive others not of other countries or cultures, then she'd be more universally condemned.
However because she said from her prejudice it would be fine to burn alive some humans from other countries and cultures.
She's more a heroine to some in the UK now.

That to me is far more worrying than the loss of a tree.
You can plant another tree, you cannot bring back to life anyone burned alive.

Ultimately I do agree with you, and the BIB is the reason why.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Just remember you’re not measuring how ‘bright’ she is, you’re watching how well a convicted racist can perform when given a platform

How confusing, you said she wasn't very bright,now you are saying she performed well in the interview Make your mind up!

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Anyway I am going to watch her interview with Allison when I get a chance and see how bright she is or isn't

The Liverpool goalie?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Just remember you’re not measuring how ‘bright’ she is, you’re watching how well a convicted racist can perform when given a platform

Innocent people have hung before. It's why they stopped it in the UK. To many people enjoyed watching the performance without the platform.

AI says, 87 percent of historical world events of people enjoying the suffering of others are lefties.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

Would you smother your Gran because she was ill?

I would if she had asked me to do it when the pain got to much.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

She's more a heroine to some in the UK now.

Only because of her needless arrest, and subsequent being made an example of.

If the correct thing (nothing) had happened after she deleted the tweet, we'd all be none the wiser as to who she is.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Only because of her needless arrest, and subsequent being made an example of.

If the correct thing (nothing) had happened after she deleted the tweet, we'd all be none the wiser as to who she is.

She should have NEVER planned, typed and then publicly posted the tweet in the first place.
Plus neither you or I were able to see all the evidence presented in her case.

Deleting it after putting it out in the public domain is all well and good but does NOT alter that she premeditated doing the tweet and voluntarily posted it.
With it's despicable content.

No way would she get any sympathy from me for her hateful and vile personal prejudiced thinking.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

She should have NEVER planned, typed and then publicly posted the tweet in the first place.
Plus neither you or I were able to see all the evidence presented in her case.

Deleting it after putting it out in the public domain is all well and good but does NOT alter that she premeditated doing the tweet and voluntarily posted it.
With it's despicable content.

No way would she get any sympathy from me for her hateful and vile personal prejudiced thinking.

I don't have any particular sympathy for her, but that's not needed to think her arrest was unneeded ... especially as it allowed her to become a martyr to some.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Beso

The Liverpool goalie?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

How confusing, you said she wasn't very bright,now you are saying she performed well in the interview Make your mind up!

Still haven’t watched it then?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Beso

Innocent people have hung before. It's why they stopped it in the UK. To many people enjoyed watching the performance without the platform.

AI says, 87 percent of historical world events of people enjoying the suffering of others are lefties.

She wasn’t innocent. She pleaded GUILTY

[Crimson Dynamo]

'The lesson is nearly always plead not guilty, but come to the Free Speech Union straight
away.'

External Affairs Officer at the Free Speech Union, Connie Shaw highlights the key
takeaways from Lucy Conolly's recent interviews after being released from prison.

Good 3 min interview is here: https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1959131692645421466

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Still haven’t watched it then?

Wrong again