FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#51 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
oops, she has now admitted she didn't pay enough stamp duty on her house
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Yes Deputy PM refers herself to the Standards Watch Dog. Best she Resigns Tonight, more Front Pages Last edited by arista; Yesterday at 10:59 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
starmer can remove her from the cabinet, he cant remove her being deputy leader
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
No one will listen to a word she says when she tries to put more tax on houses
![]() She has now referred herself to some watchdog or other
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by bots; Yesterday at 11:39 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
If Starmer had any backbone he would remove her as Housing Minister as this will impact her job, he is probably afraid to make an enemy of her at this stage, he has already fallen out with Rachel
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
Do as I say not as I do. Revolting
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
It seems to me that she neglected to mention the Trust and this is why she was given the incorrect advice, I think mention of a Trust would raise flags all over the shop and there is no way she would have been given the advice she was had she been honest
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
The deputy PM said she should have paid more tax on her £800,000 flat in Hove. Credit: PA
The housing secretary has admitted paying the wrong amount of tax on a house. * That is pretty much the worst headline conceivable about any housing secretary, let alone Angela Rayner, who is also the deputy prime minister and spent years as Labour’s sleazehunter-in-chief. * That’s the straightforward fact which makes this such a damaging, indeed career-threatening, episode for Rayner. * Other elements are not quite so straightforward. The case was unusual because it involved her divorce, and a trust Rayner and her ex-husband had set up to provide for her son, who has lifelong disabilities. * Crucially, Rayner is adamant that she sought advice from a lawyer about the stamp duty liable, and has only now learnt from a different lawyer that that advice was wrong. It is on that basis that she is not resigning. * It is no doubt on that basis as well that Sir Keir Starmer whole-heartedly defended his deputy at PMQs this afternoon - though remember that while he could sack her from her government positions she has an independent mandate as deputy leader of the Labour Party which only she can give up. * It is also on the basis of the apparently flawed initial advice that Labour officials, ministers and MPs mostly seem - as of this afternoon - to believe that Rayner will probably survive the independent investigation into whether she has breached the ministerial code. * Whether she will survive in the court of public opinion is being treated as a separate matter altogether. However it now develops, this is a very damaging episode for Rayner’s political future. * The essential: Even if Rayner’s ministerial career survives her admission on tax, she is likely to be badly damaged. Keep reading Politic If I were her I would be suing the lawyer who gave her poor advice ![]()
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The Watchdog Commission
will have to talk to her. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Makes you wonder what other standard stuff does she not understand?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
If you’ve got a scapegoat then if things wrong you can stand up and say well do what they advised
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
She has to go. Damage is done.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() Last edited by arista; Today at 12:11 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|