About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Zizu · Today, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi

….I mean, I don’t know what roles you’ve seen her in but ‘gorgeous’ is in the eye of the beholder and the vein of roles that she had been cast in already would suggest that she’s someone who is considered gorgeous by many beholders, myself included…I sincerely can’t think why this would feel a brave decision …(…if the role is even any more than another media rumour/speculation etc…)…for an actress whose previous character portrayal have been of what have been considered to be ‘gorgeous people’ to be be cast as a gorgeous person…I mean, it accurately describes what her physical appearance is for very many…

I haven’t seen her in any roles/ movies

My point is 007 always gets the gorgeous ladies … the classically beautiful ones so I don’t see how a non binary option would appeal

Ammi · Today, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zizu

I haven’t seen her in any roles/ movies

My point is 007 always gets the gorgeous ladies … the classically beautiful ones so I don’t see how a non binary option would appeal

…she is imo and obviously in the opinion of casting producers ‘classically beautiful’ as the roles of Princess Diana and Lady Chatterley and the upcoming Elizabeth Bennet are all characters to be considered ‘classically beautifully’ so she’s exactly considered to be physically perfect for that role and also of the ‘gorgeous James Bond’ variety as your definition is …as to someone in their personal life identifying as non binary but playing roles that aren’t non binary if that’s what the character is or isn’t well that’s quite the usual thing for acting, to portray a character that doesn’t necessarily reflect who the actor is in their real life…we don’t even know if she is indeed going to have a role in a Bond movie so we have no idea what would appeal to her…/…why she would be drawn to a role….actually I don’t know what the preferred pronouns are for Emma Corrin…I mean, all I’m taking from this is that you personally don’t find Emma Corrin attractive and that’s obviously in the eye of the beholder…if casting producers didn’t completely disagree as I also do, she wouldn’t have been chosen for such ‘classically beautiful character roles’….but her acting portfolio seems to be pretty much made up of those roles…

Zizu · Today, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi

…she is imo and obviously in the opinion of casting producers ‘classically beautiful’ as the roles of Princess Diana and Lady Chatterley and the upcoming Elizabeth Bennet are all characters to be considered ‘classically beautifully’ so she’s exactly considered to be physically perfect for that role and also of the ‘gorgeous James Bond’ variety as your definition is …as to someone in their personal life identifying as non binary but playing roles that aren’t non binary if that’s what the character is or isn’t well that’s quite the usual thing for acting, to portray a character that doesn’t necessarily reflect who the actor is in their real life…we don’t even know if she is indeed going to have a role in a Bond movie so we have no idea what would appeal to her…/…why she would be drawn to a role….actually I don’t know what the preferred pronouns are for Emma Corrin…I mean, all I’m taking from this is that you personally don’t find Emma Corrin attractive and that’s obviously in the eye of the beholder…if casting producers didn’t completely disagree as I also do, she wouldn’t have been chosen for such ‘classically beautiful character roles’….but her acting portfolio seems to be pretty much made up of those roles…

I had to look her up on Google images..

So being a sucker for a pretty face such as ..

Charleze Theron , Leslie Anne Down , Michelle Keegan types

I would not class her as being gorgeous at all and that’s the issue with the idea of 007 suddenly changing his taste in women

Ammi · Today, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zizu

I had to look her up on Google images..

So being a sucker for a pretty face such as ..

Charleze Theron , Leslie Anne Down , Michelle Keegan types

I would not class her as being gorgeous at all and that’s the issue with the idea of 007 suddenly changing his taste in women

….well atm it’s still to be confirmed which actor will be in the Bond role, let alone who any other featured actors/characters will be…it’s all speculation …I believe that the only reason for Emma’s name being out there is that within that speculation her name has been suggested widely by some public who feel she is ‘gorgeous enough’ and asked yes why can’t we have Emma please…imo every ‘Bond leading lady’ brings a unique aspect to the role with each different actor’s character… as does each different Bond casting themselves and it’s as yet to be seen what the new chosen actor will bring / and we all have our favourites and least favourites etc ….and that’s the classical beauty and gorgeous-ness of discovering new…I’m sure that if Emma is cast then the new James Bond casting will find her face as pretty as all of the other roles she’s played have been….