[Lauren]

Originally posted by Nurse57

So, they are both 18 or over and have a photo with their legs open. What is the difference?

People would've seen Dale regardless because they watch BB.

However, having semi naked pictures of herself as a signature isn't relevant to the forum and not necessary (though as I said before, not against the rules so it's not something to be held against her).

I guess if people feel uncomfortable about it and make a formal complaint then admins can see whether it's necessary. As Kaz said, no complaints have been made so bigbro101 is not in the wrong.

Just personally I feel its not necessary.

[Bright-Eyes]

Originally posted by KKBL
i think its inapropriate,but if it is then bemji and brigh-eyes avatar is kinda to.but i supose thats not actualy pics of themselves.

I think the fact it is not us makes a diffrence I can not think of why but it does.

[Jack_]

I didn't have a problem with it tbh, and I am 13.

But I would understand if someone had a problem with it, as some people find it uncomfortable to look at, which is fair enough.

But like I say, I had/have no problem with it.

[KKBL]

Originally posted by Bright-Eyes

I think the fact it is not us makes a diffrence I can not think of why but it does.

i just think if shes not aloud her picture because its a picture of herself then fine but if shes not allowed her picture just because its a nudity then neither should yours or Benji's

[mlwfan]

I don't think whether it's allowed has come into question as much. I think people have just expressed their personal opinions on it thus far.