[Sunny_01]

I think Darnell's intentions were right, I think his wording was poor. I think Mario understood what Darnell was saying but took the opportunity to act all indignant just because he can. I am not a huge Mario fan but do think that Darnell needs to be more careful when talking to people like Mario who will happily mi-interpret what he has said.

[GiRTh]

I didn't agree with either but of the two Darnell made more sense. Mario doesn't seem to like anyone telling him that he may, some time down the line, not be right. He's totally oversensitive and doesn't strike me as much of a team player unless he's in charge. I think it's one of the reasons why I think he'll be up again this week.

[letmein]

Originally posted by Matt10k
It's almost like Mario thinks he can win any situation by pretending he has experience in that field.

Darnell was voted most musical housemate. Mario needed to shut up and listen for a change.

He has a fan club, donchaknow?

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics
So in that case anything negative said against a person, their ability to argue and therefore their argument is insulting them, so you're basically painting yourselves into a corner making it against the rules to prove other peoples arguments wrong. When someone rewords quotes to suit their argument there is no other option but to pull them up on it.

This is a big brother site, let's not pretend it's a mecca for supreme debaters, that'd be rather pretentious to say the least.

I mistakenly stated the quote wrong but I don't see how it made any difference to my argument?! I did already mention that. Bit pedantic to keep mentioning it as if it was a major part of my argument. How it's worded makes no differance-

I already explained why I don't think Darnell uses the victim card. The poster seemed to have a problem accepting my opinion- calling me ignorant and being really patronising.

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by Matt10k

I mistakenly stated the quote wrong but I don't see how it made any difference to my argument?! I did already mention that. Bit pedantic to keep mentioning it as if it was a major part of my argument. How it's worded makes no differance-

I already explained why I don't think Darnell uses the victim card. The poster seemed to have a problem accepting my opinion- calling me ignorant and being really patronising.

I wasn't purposely trying to highlight your mistake Matt, it was just part of the point I was making that headaball was making a good argument and you wouldn't back down with the misquoting issue. If I'm being honest I think you kind of brought it on yourself when he gave you the piece of constructive criticism about being ignorant in this case, but then headaball was the one apprehended by the moderator, which wasn't right. Again, my main point was not to make a big deal about your mistake, it wasn't that major.

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics
I wasn't purposely trying to highlight your mistake Matt, it was just part of the point I was making that headaball was making a good argument and you wouldn't back down with the misquoting issue. If I'm being honest I think you kind of brought it on yourself when he gave you the piece of constructive criticism about being ignorant in this case, but then headaball was the one apprehended by the moderator, which wasn't right. Again, my main point was not to make a big deal about your mistake, it wasn't that major.

Back down? I told him it was a mistake! If you read what I put about Darnell, you’ll see it doesn’t effect my argument anyway.

And it was fair that he was warned. He was warned in another thread but continued to be patronising and calling me ignorant in this thread.

[SuperMario]

Mario was right Darnell completley snapped when Mario was trying to make a point

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by Matt10k
it was fair that he was warned. He was warned in another thread but continued to be patronising and calling me ignorant in this thread.

Which brings it to the main point I was making. You think it's fair someone was warned because they were being patronising and called you ignorant, but the problem is you were being ignorant to the sympathy card issue, which Darnell was clearly playing, as headaball pointed out. It's not right for you to expect moderator protection just because you're being beaten fair and square in an argument, but you obviously think otherwise. Sadly you got it, probably because you're a popular member and the other guy's a newb, which is why I felt the need to stick my nose in, because I would be annoyed if the same had happened to me.

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

Which brings it to the main point I was making. You think it's fair someone was warned because they were being patronising and called you ignorant, but the problem is you were being ignorant to the sympathy card issue, which Darnell was clearly playing, as headaball pointed out. It's not right for you to expect moderator protection just because you're being beaten fair and square in an argument, but you obviously think otherwise. Sadly you got it, probably because you're a popular member and the other guy's a newb, which is why I felt the need to stick my nose in, because I would be annoyed if the same had happened to me.

Actually, I don't think I am particularly popular. That would be a silly justification anyway, the mods always treat people equally, regardless of when they signed up. I have had the occasional telling off too.

Also, I don't believe he was using the 'victim' card and I argued my side of it. That doesn't make me ignorant. Looking at Darnels personality, I don't believe he was using it (if you read back you will see my arguments there).

On the modding issue again, I think it comes down to discretion. It's not only what you say but how you say it. He was being overly patronising and aggressive- there was no need to be that way.

[SexualHeroics]

OK, I hear you. Have a good evening.

[MaDdOctoR]

Originally posted by tinkerbell

LOL. i second that

:c olour:



and not sure if it's been said yet but, Darnell is Ron Perlman



dOc

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by MaDdOctoR
firstly it's DARNELL not DARELL

and he was right, Mario was being a prick as usual, using Mickey as his little "community service" project...stop telling people that he needs help, or the first choice...he's blind, not a *****ing moron...like Mario.

is anyone on here in the Mario and Lisa fanclub? if you are could you please commence jumping off the nearest cliff thank you.

dOc

Please don't be rude to Mario and Lisa's fans, it's against forum rules.

[MaDdOctoR]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

Please don't be rude to Mario and Lisa's fans, it's against forum rules.

it's ok...I think most of them jumped already...

I don't believe I've broken any rules, this comment has been here for a while now, and no moderators have told me off...so

and it's merely a joke... lighten up

dOc