[GiRTh]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

It was pretty obvious to me on first reading. Seems like it takes more effort to not see it.

It looked like a lot of tough talking to me. We disagree on that. There's nothing wrong with that.

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

It was pretty obvious to me on first reading. Seems like it takes more effort to not see it.

I'm not sure what you are saying. We agree that she should have been booted but disagree on the reasons? Is that right?

Or is it that you want her thrown in jail for what is at best, a very vague threat that she could easily just tell police was perfectly innocent and they wouldn't have a leg to stand on?

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by Matt10k is it that you want her thrown in jail for what is at best, a very vague threat that she could easily just tell police was perfectly innocent and they wouldn't have a leg to stand on?

What are you on about, when did anyone let alone me say she should be thrown in jail? We're talking about her threatening people. I pointed out the threats she made which the two of you strangely denied existed, even though it was there in the article.

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics
What are you on about, when did anyone let alone me say she should be thrown in jail? We're talking about her threatening people. I pointed out the threats she made which the two of you strangely denied existed, even though it was there in the article.

We all agree that she should have been thrown out but we disagree on how seriously we must take her alleged threats. If you're so certain of these threats then why can you not tell me more.

I dont see the point in going round and round. Why not agree to disagree.

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

What are you on about, when did anyone let alone me say she should be thrown in jail? We're talking about her threatening people. I pointed out the threats she made which the two of you denied existed.

I was just trying to understand your point. Some people have said she should be arrested for her comments. I didn't say you, I was just wondering where you stood on it.

I was making the point that whether she was making threats to murder people or not is subject to opinion- in the eyes of the law, it's unlikely she could get in trouble for what she said in there.

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by GiRTh
If you're so certain of these threats then why can you not tell me more.

LOL How much do you want to know? The make of the guns she intends to use/have used? Whether she'll be wearing her 2pac doo-rag when she's pulling the trigger?!

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

LOL How much do you want to know? The make of the guns she intends to have used? Whether she'll be wearing her 2pac doo-rag when she's pulling the trigger?!

What guns? I didn't see any mention of guns. Why the hip-hop references?

So you're not going to agree to disagree?

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by Matt10k

I was just trying to understand your point. Some people have said she should be arrested for her comments. I didn't say you, I was just wondering where you stood on it.

I was making the point that whether she was making threats to murder people or not is subject to opinion- in the eyes of the law, it's unlikely she could get in trouble for what she said in there.

I'm not too sure what the law will say on the matter. All I know is she's made threats and she had to be thrown out.

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics

I'm not too sure what the law will say on the matter. All I know is she's made threats and she had to be thrown out.

Alledgedly made threats. You cant prove it so I think its not cut in stone.

[Matt10k]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics
I'm not too sure what the law will say on the matter. All I know is she's made threats and she had to be thrown out.

As GiRTh says then, it's just opinion. We could spend all day arguing about what she meant by it but at the end of the day, none of us know/ can prove for sure what she meant by it.

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by Matt10k

As GiRTh says then, it's just opinion. We could spend all day arguing about what she meant by it but at the end of the day, none of us know for sure what she meant.

Exactly.

Personally, knowing her personality, I think her comments were meant as a threat but, going by the transcript there is no where near enough for any one to say with any amount of certainty, she was indeed threatening the other HM's. Thats a matter for the police.

[SexualHeroics]

Originally posted by Matt10k

As GiRTh says then, it's just opinion. We could spend all day arguing about what she meant by it but at the end of the day, none of us know/ can prove for sure what she meant by it.

I think you have to bury your head firmly in the sand to not understand what she meant by her comments. Although I will agree it may not be enough to stand up in a courtroom, which isn't saying much. Common sense and the law are two different things.

[MontanaFX]

Originally posted by voddie
i feel sorry for her daughter, imagine having to live with that as mother!!

I wouldnt say stuff like that man. You could get shot. Member I ....

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by SexualHeroics
I think you have to bury your head firmly in the sand to not understand what she meant by her comments. Although I will agree it may not be enough to stand up in a courtroom, which isn't saying much. Common sense and the law are two different things.

Agreed.

[MaDdOctoR]

Originally posted by GiRTh

Leslie threatened Sam in BB6. Did she make good on the thread? Did Leslie get kicked out? The answer to both questions is no. So why is this any different?

The fact that Alex's boyfriend is an accused murderer means nothing. He has not been convicted of anything.

I feel it was right to throw her out only because - like Emily last year - The producers must make a stand against such behaviour, but I still think Alex is not truly guilty of anything.

this is different due to BB getting into the Sh*t over the years, they are watching their backs now, and I don't blame them, the comments, MAY not have been TRUTHFUL but, the way she acts, make me think that she is used to having her "mans" around when she disagrees with something...(and let's face it...the woman disagrees with air)

but going solely on those comments, BB had to do something, and kicking her out before anything else was said is better for everyone concerned, especially her...she's already had her car scraped (if that was her car of course...could have just been false news)

but I think most of us are glad she's gone...no more flying off the handle about nothing...too much of the HL show was her having a hissy fit...which I just can't stand, I want to see everyone.

dOc

[WARING]

I'm surprised they let her into the house in the first place, don't they screen these people and make sure they're not loonies?

[GiRTh]

Originally posted by MaDdOctoR
this is different due to BB getting into the Sh*t over the years, they are watching their backs now, and I don't blame them, the comments, MAY not have been TRUTHFUL but, the way she acts, make me think that she is used to having her "mans" around when she disagrees with something...(and let's face it...the woman disagrees with air)

but going solely on those comments, BB had to do something, and kicking her out before anything else was said is better for everyone concerned, especially her...she's already had her car scraped (if that was her car of course...could have just been false news)

but I think most of us are glad she's gone...no more flying off the handle about nothing...too much of the HL show was her having a hissy fit...which I just can't stand, I want to see everyone.

dOc

Absolutely. It had to be done.