Quote:
Originally posted by _Audrey
Quote:
Originally posted by Ruth
Quote:
Originally posted by _Audrey
Am I the only one who thinks this is old news? I read it in a magazine last week 
I don't agree with it but I certainly don't feel sorry for her - after all, if she hadn't of acted the way she did, it wouldn't have happened. Her behaviour was the catalyst.
|
Everyone should take responsibility for their own actions. Alex's behaviour was disgusting, and it was absolutely right that she was removed from the house. But acts of violence like the ones in the article are the fault of the idiots who commit them. It is their own pathetic attitudes that are the catalyst for their own pathetic actions.
|
I said I don't agree with it so I don't see what the point in you saying all that is. And no it's not them who were the catalyst - if she hadn't acted like an idiot, it wouldn't have happened. Therefore her behaviour was the catalyst.
|
Well under that logic, people who are shot dead by thugs over something they may have said are the catalyst to their own, cold blooded murder. When no, they weren't, the catalyst was that it's what thugs do; they kill, they vandalise, they aren't nice people ... they go out and look for people or people's property to harm, so I don't agree that Alex's behaviour can be remotely blamed for people vandalising a house that may have had an 8 year old child in ... their thuggish mindset was the catalyst, their boredom was the catalyst.
01-07-2008, 06:24 PM
Reply With Quote
Threaded Mode