Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

International Big Brother Big Brother around the world!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-09-2008, 11:06 PM #1
SiaSiaSia's Avatar
SiaSiaSia SiaSiaSia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,847

Favourites:
The Apprentice 2013: Jason
X Factor 2009: John & Edward


SiaSiaSia SiaSiaSia is offline
Senior Member
SiaSiaSia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,847

Favourites:
The Apprentice 2013: Jason
X Factor 2009: John & Edward


Default Big Brother winners tend to be boring/offend the least amount of people.

Does anyone agree?
Every year we've had very boring winners: Anthony BB6 didn't really do much apart from be arrogant and quiet, Pete BB7 was alright & nice but still pretty quiet, and Brian, BB8. well. Oh and Cameron, BB4. And now Rachel, BB9.

My mum said usually the winners are the politically correct ones or the ones who don't offend anyone. (Also the whole sympathy vote thing / voting for some one "different" - i.e. Nadia was a transexual and Pete had tourettes)
Now i think that Nadia was a brilliant winner, as she had amazing personality. Pete was a good winner, and was at least fun, but I wonder what the outcome would have been without his tourettes.

Just wondering if anyone agreed, really?

[/rant]
SiaSiaSia is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
amount, big brother, boring or offend, people, tend, winners


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts