FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Does anyone agree?
Every year we've had very boring winners: Anthony BB6 didn't really do much apart from be arrogant and quiet, Pete BB7 was alright & nice but still pretty quiet, and Brian, BB8. well. Oh and Cameron, BB4. And now Rachel, BB9. My mum said usually the winners are the politically correct ones or the ones who don't offend anyone. (Also the whole sympathy vote thing / voting for some one "different" - i.e. Nadia was a transexual and Pete had tourettes) Now i think that Nadia was a brilliant winner, as she had amazing personality. Pete was a good winner, and was at least fun, but I wonder what the outcome would have been without his tourettes. Just wondering if anyone agreed, really? [/rant] |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|