Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-02-2009, 05:57 AM #76
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Default

Can we get back to topic about how much say reluctant fathers should get if their partner or former partner get's pregnant by him.
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-02-2009, 05:57 AM #77
andyman's Avatar
andyman andyman is offline
Classic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hic et ubique
Posts: 26,739


andyman andyman is offline
Classic
andyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hic et ubique
Posts: 26,739


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
Can I remind you that this is meant to be a family friendly forum
Purple!
andyman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-02-2009, 06:01 AM #78
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Default

I am a moderator on BAUT - we use purple when moderating
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-02-2009, 06:03 AM #79
andyman's Avatar
andyman andyman is offline
Classic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hic et ubique
Posts: 26,739


andyman andyman is offline
Classic
andyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hic et ubique
Posts: 26,739


Default

Well my view on the topic is that the man should own his seed.. The woman only has the egg, the seed is higher in rank!

Plus many women use the man to get pregnant... Child support etc! Why should he pay if only she wanted the child?..
andyman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-02-2009, 06:17 AM #80
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
Can I remind you that this is meant to be a family friendly forum
lol well tell andyman directly and don't be so indiscriminate.
ange7 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 22-02-2009, 06:21 AM #81
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
oooo fck .... is that rhyming slang for w@nk? Come on people ...andyman needs to know if he's guilty of murder on an untold scale.
Huge scale... Mass amount! tommy tankinging, wearing the sausage coat, treat on her face... I could be worse than pol pot and hitler!!!
treat on her face ?..... what kind of birthday parties did you go to as a kid. hehe when is that a treat?
Women love a facial...
aww so not only are you a self confirmed "tommy tank" er ( did I phrase that right?) but your single too hehe.p
ange7 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 25-02-2009, 09:15 PM #82
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense
Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-02-2009, 10:40 PM #83
Twilight's Avatar
Twilight Twilight is offline
****
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Twilight Twilight is offline
****
Twilight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense






Twilight is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 28-02-2009, 08:59 PM #84
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense



Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 28-02-2009, 09:05 PM #85
WATERS's Avatar
WATERS WATERS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,941
WATERS WATERS is offline
Senior Member
WATERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,941
Default

Yeh
WATERS is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 02:51 AM #86
Twilight's Avatar
Twilight Twilight is offline
****
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Twilight Twilight is offline
****
Twilight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense



Twilight is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 04:50 AM #87
Novo's Avatar
Novo Novo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England
Posts: 58,822

Favourites (more):
CBB20: Chad Johnson
BB14: Dexter


Novo Novo is offline
Senior Member
Novo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England
Posts: 58,822

Favourites (more):
CBB20: Chad Johnson
BB14: Dexter


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
Can I remind you that this is meant to be a family friendly forum
Purple!
You tell them sticks
Novo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 04:15 PM #88
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense



Bore off "princess "
Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 05:58 PM #89
Twilight's Avatar
Twilight Twilight is offline
****
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Twilight Twilight is offline
****
Twilight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,425

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: One Direction
X Factor 2009: Lloyd Daniels


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense



Bore off "princess "
I'm done with you for now
Twilight is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 10:01 PM #90
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by TheTwilightPrincess5
Quote:
Originally posted by 08marsh
Quote:
Originally posted by Lewis
Overall you are killing a living thing, so i would say it is murder?
Finally, someone with a bit of sense



Bore off "princess "
I'm done with you for now
Ok den, ickle girl! Night night.
Marsh. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 07:56 AM #91
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
For the record I do not like the idea of abortions, but it is a fact of life we are stuck with.

So having said that, when a woman gets pregnant and wants to terminate we hear the argument that it is her body and has the right to choose. If the prospective father does not want her to have the abortion, that's tough, he has no say.

But, suppose the couple are going through IVF, if the man withdraws his consent as has happened in recent court cases then the woman is not allowed to continue end of story.

So the suggestion to debate is this

Suppose a woman gets pregnant, as it could be argued that part of the foetus came from the man's sperm contribution, then it's part of the man's body as well. Should the man be legally entitled to insist that the woman have a termination if he does not want to be a father, just like he can withdraw consent on IVF.

Would this not be fair.
What are you talking about, IVF, and she's not allowed to continue?

It's nobodies business. It's the woman's body. End of discussion.

When you came inside her, that was your last warning that you could become a parent.
letmein is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 07:57 AM #92
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Well my view on the topic is that the man should own his seed.. The woman only has the egg, the seed is higher in rank!

Plus many women use the man to get pregnant... Child support etc! Why should he pay if only she wanted the child?..
Because he knocked her up and put her in that position. You don't get to own a woman's body suddenly for 9 months. You want to carry it, and you're male, go ahead and try.
letmein is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 07:58 AM #93
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
letmein letmein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,384

Favourites:
BB17: Jayne
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7

lol...why would this even be open for debate? Obviously he can't nor does he have any such right. Are you arguing the he ought to have the final choice Sticks?
But already in IVF he can pull the plug

I am putting the "what if" scenario of what if he also had the final say in natural pregnancies?

Also the pro-choice lobby always use the "Women's body" argument and therefore I am turning this around as the man could say part of his body went to make the child so in these days of equality he should be able to decide.

I suspect that some terminations have been done because some woman have been bullied into it by men who did not want their partner to come to term.


On personal level if I had a wife/ girlfriend - and had got her pregnant, I would wanting her to keep the child
No the your confusing the 2 examples... they aren't comparable since in your IVF example no egg has yet been fertilised. Him having the right to withdraw consent of the IVF fertilisation doesn't logically lead to him therefore having the right to choose whether she , once impregnated via IVF or otherwise, has the right to decide on the termination. You see the difference is during conception the man gave his consent ( obviously) but in your IVF example he clearly hasn't.

"Also the pro-choice lobby always use the "Women's body" argument and therefore I am turning this around as the man could say part of his body"

Again not applicable since the "body" referred to here isn't simply the genetic information but the actual human who has to go through the delivery of the baby. It's her body... she has the choice. The argument that it's part of his body too therefore he should have the choice doesn't cut it.

"I suspect that some terminations have been done because some woman have been bullied into it by men who did not want their partner to come to term." Very likely but that isn't argument enough to deny the majority of women their right to choose.
what?... no reply Sticks
So if a woman wants the baby and the man does not want the baby the woman has more legal rights? And when the baby is born the man by law has to support that child with paying child support?
Yep. And that's biology. Take it up with nature. There's more affect on the woman than the man.
letmein is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 08:02 AM #94
Fom Fom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 7,411


Fom Fom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 7,411


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by letmein
Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
For the record I do not like the idea of abortions, but it is a fact of life we are stuck with.

So having said that, when a woman gets pregnant and wants to terminate we hear the argument that it is her body and has the right to choose. If the prospective father does not want her to have the abortion, that's tough, he has no say.

But, suppose the couple are going through IVF, if the man withdraws his consent as has happened in recent court cases then the woman is not allowed to continue end of story.

So the suggestion to debate is this

Suppose a woman gets pregnant, as it could be argued that part of the foetus came from the man's sperm contribution, then it's part of the man's body as well. Should the man be legally entitled to insist that the woman have a termination if he does not want to be a father, just like he can withdraw consent on IVF.

Would this not be fair.
What are you talking about, IVF, and she's not allowed to continue?

It's nobodies business. It's the woman's body. End of discussion.

When you came inside her, that was your last warning that you could become a parent.
I agree, but I also believe that the idea of terminations is wrong. So I think that if a male does climax inside the woman then the woman needs to take responsibility for not taking the pill or having unprotected sex. It works both ways, if you are not going to be sensible then you shouldn't be having sex. Women need to accept the responsibilities just like men do.
So what if it's your body, it is still your fault.
Fom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 04:14 PM #95
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by letmein
What are you talking about, IVF, and she's not allowed to continue?

It's nobodies business. It's the woman's body. End of discussion.

When you came inside her, that was your last warning that you could become a parent.
There was a court case where a couple going through IVF split up and the man withdrew consent. She had had cancer treatment so this was her only chance for a child, but under the law, which was held up by the courts, the fertilised embryos were destroyed, because the man no longer wanted to be a father.

This is the law relating to IVF, pre-implantation.

This anomaly in the law does prompt the question, if the man has this right to pull the plug on IVF, in these days of equality could it be argued that the man should have the right to insist the woman have a termination.

For the record if I were to have got either a girl friend or a wife pregnant, I would be wanting them to have the child and play a full part in it's life, but I do wonder if this scenario may one day come to pass
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
fathers, termination, woman


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts