Quote:
Originally posted by GhettoSuperstar
Quote:
Originally posted by Stu
Quote:
Originally posted by GhettoSuperstar
Let's break down the word itself:
Under (i.e. low, poorly) ... rated (popularity/quality)
And from my knowledge the Jonas Brothers are rated very low by many people in this country. I.e. making them under-rated. I am a Jonas fan so yeah I'd know kkai?
|
So by your definition the Fast Food Rockers were underated? After all, their music was rated very low and they lost popularity rather quick.
The Jonas Brothers are all over TV here. They have free merchandise with every teen magazine in the country. My little sister has her bedroom wall covered in their posters. Their not underated. Or overated. They are a product of exactly what they are : A product.
|
Ewww no!
What a way to turn a point of view into something utterly ridiculous.  I felt that is insulting my intelligence when really I have backed up what I've said, logically.
They are under-rated. I have nothing more to say.
|
Two different tenses in a sentence used about your intelligence and me apparently insulting it.
Fuck me, that is irony to die for my friend.
You might have backed up your point logically but you dont appear to be fending mine off very well. Again, from the top...
The Jonas Brothers are all over TV here. They have free merchandise with every teen magazine in the country. My little sister has her bedroom wall covered in their posters. Their not underated. Or overated. They are a product of exactly what they are : A product.
They have
huge exposure through
multiple media channels and sell
huge with their target markets. Sorry, but the notion that they are underated is
fucking hysterical.
26-05-2009, 11:32 PM
Threaded Mode