Quote:
Originally posted by reallynow
Quote:
Originally posted by BB22
Quote:
Originally posted by reallynow
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Quote:
Originally posted by Hedgie
There is no way Marcus would use it to trade for favours. He's clever enough to know that the first question asked would be where he got them and why was he keeping them when he wasn't a smoker. He had them so he could dish them out cause he's sick of the smokers getting all tweaky when they've run out. If Divvy thinks he should be punished for that, then Divvy should consider that Doggy rooting through someone elses belongings is a far bigger crime and i consider it much more offensive.
|
Lazy fat pig marcus could not be bothered to get off his lard arse to go and get his own tinny from his drawer. His limited braincells let it slip from his selective memory that sending the lovely helpful Sophie to get it for him would expose his self-serving usury.
His post-hoc cover story (remember he had tantalised Rebecca with the promise of a 'present' in the future), that he was going to give them to Rebecca because she was a nice considerate sharer, does not wash. Remember how altruistic she is? "I gave you the cigaretttes, now hand over the Frosties bitch". That is how nicely she shares.
Marcus should have been REMOVED for gross anti-social behaviour long before now. He WILL be nominated, but there are others who also deserve to go (Rebecca and Freddie for example), so we shall see.
|
ROFL what I cant stand about Marcus is that he thinks he is totally right 100 percent of the time, in his eyes he has never done any wrong LOL
|
I am afraid this forum is full of people like that. The evidence presents itself every day, as far as I can see.
|
Forum and the reality of social life are two different things. I can bash many things on my keyboard, however, living daily and communicating with people comes with restraints and learning from our past mistakes...Marcus in his eyes makes no mistakes!
|
That is kind of interesting. I think someone whose actual
perception of things changes in an online environment is subject to a kind of intellectual failing, something they should work to remedy. Precisely the same strictures on truth, falsity and the evaluation of available information apply in online environments as they do in rl, it is merely the social pressures that are different. I should clarify that I am in no way implying that that applies to your good self. It is merely an observation with regard to the interesting point you made.