Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

International Big Brother Big Brother around the world!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-09-2009, 06:44 AM #1
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,255


Default Could Channel 4 get out of doing BB11?

Channel 4 are contractually obligated to do BB11, but as they have decided to drop Big Brother, is there a way they could pay Endemol off and not do BB11?

I was wondering if there are any C4 execs wondering about that possibility
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 05:26 PM #2
Kate!'s Avatar
Kate! Kate! is offline
IntoxiKated
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wigan baby yeah!
Posts: 35,061

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Ali
BB2023: Henry


Kate! Kate! is offline
IntoxiKated
Kate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wigan baby yeah!
Posts: 35,061

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Ali
BB2023: Henry


Default

this is not funny
Kate! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 05:33 PM #3
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

It would cost more than its worth. They might as well go ahead with a series they've already paid for rather than waste £60m, then pay off a contract with money they don't have, then commission another 93 hours worth of programming starting in 9 months time

Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 07:21 PM #4
Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Default

It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.

It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too.

Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show.

That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done.
Brekkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 10:00 PM #5
Kate!'s Avatar
Kate! Kate! is offline
IntoxiKated
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wigan baby yeah!
Posts: 35,061

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Ali
BB2023: Henry


Kate! Kate! is offline
IntoxiKated
Kate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wigan baby yeah!
Posts: 35,061

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Ali
BB2023: Henry


Default

[rquote=2513430&tid=145024&author=Brekkie]It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.

It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too.

Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show.

That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done.[/rquote]

my god, a PERSON WHO TALKS SENSE! BB producers take heed,why the hell didn't u come up with this solution, and the show wouldn't have gone down the tubes, all us fans are gutted, n summer ain't summer without bb.cmon,its not too late.
Kate! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 10:29 PM #6
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

[rquote=2513430&tid=145024&author=Brekkie]It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.

It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too.

Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show.

That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done.[/rquote]

How would 2 11 week series' at £60m be cheaper than 3 summer series' and January series' at £180 altogether?
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 02:49 PM #7
Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Default

[rquote=2515445&tid=145024&author=Tom]
How would 2 11 week series' at £60m be cheaper than 3 summer series' and January series' at £180 altogether? [/rquote]
First I'll mock your schoolboy error by saying obviously not.

Secondly, two series for £60m rather than three series plus extras for £180m is obviously cheaper. C4 would pay out £30m a year rather than £60m. They lose Celeb BB and a couple of weeks off the main show, but everyone agrees the main show would benefit from that.


Right back to the original question and considering this year BB cost £60m and bought in just £32m in ad revenue, there is an argument that C4 paying Endemol £30m not to have BB11 might have been value for money.
Brekkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
bb11, channel 4


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts