[Sir_Diary_of_Roomus]

Originally Posted by TheHarbinger24

Brian Belo, eugh. God knows who voted him the winner over the twins.

Bookies.

[danda012]

Originally Posted by Sir_Diary_of_Roomus

Bookies.

Bookies were backing the twins.

[DrunkerThanMoses]

Brain Belo! Just an annoying human being!

[CaraRawr]

Rachel

[Fandango]

Most of the winners have been awful, the so called big characters are always voted off as soon as they are up. Nadia, Brian Bellend, Cameron, were almost foisted upon us for a variety of reasons. Nadia (C4 going all PC) Brian Bellend (Stupidity is the name of the game and he played it well for obviously those who voted for him) Cameron (The Scottish nerd christian) Its because of the winners and the way BB/Endemol have manipulated every friggin series that the show is coming to an end. This years series could have been the best but they were at it again, were some of the HM's for real, the non nominations (that was pathetic) the blatant bias of editing. So many reasons why the show has ran its course, most notably the sheer incompetence of the makers and their total disregard for the viewer, or rather, their assumption that no matter what drivel they put out the public would remain hooked. Everything has a shelf life and if you abuse it the shelf life becomes shorter. Getting to 9-10 possibly 11 years is not to bad though. So I really hope they lose the shackles and let the HM's go for it this year and let us decide who we want to win.

[podge2007]

Rachel, although most of them were atrocious.

[decisivemoment]

Haven't really liked any of the winners to be tbh, some were so blatantly edited it was a joke. Used to reckon that BB without Davina would be unthinkable but now, it may actually be for the best if she goes. It needs some fresh ideas, more energy and not some sad middle aged woman trying to do jokes from the autocue. Davina I'm afraid was an embarassment last series, and her disgraceful bias towards certain HM's and those ridiculous interviews were so sad to watch. Does her agent pick up all the dross from each series and make a fast buck out of them. Its just a joke what the show became and the justification from the production team in order to blag their way out of manipulating certain situations by insisting that the show is a social experiment is beyond absurd.

[Xabinight]

Brian Bello is the biggest muppet I have ever seen, he is a circus freak just does anything to get on TV, sad. How the hell does he get on every BB spin off, who is behind that. Has there been any good or deserved winners really, YOU DECIDE.

[jaymando]

Worst winner ever mmmmmmmmm theres been a few, Cameron was quite boring as was most of them. The nature of the game is that those who (entertain) to some and who (irritate) to others are usually nominated first and inevitably evicted. By the time the production crew especially this year had finished their farcical editing process many people actually thought Sophie had been the star of the show, escapes me what she actually did. She wasn't the worst but she is typical of BB winners to date. Its almost like a compromise candidate wins everytime.

[Rory]

Brian Belo by far. Stupidity was rewarded in 2007.

[aiv]

Sophie was a waste of space in the house I'm sure there were would-be contestants that would be a lot more entertaining. I still don't understand WHY she won... somebody please explain

[Stu]

Cameron my ass. Cameron is saved from these things by the fact that he was in a boring series anyway.

Big Brother 9 on the other hand was a cracking series, and was won by someone who has about as much charisma as a fucking used caravan.

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Rory

Brian Belo by far. Stupidity was rewarded in 2007.

I thought big brother is known for its stupidity? well.. we have definately had stupid people in bb8, bb9 and bb10! but as long as their is entertainment, Im happy!

And I liked Cameron from bb4, I thought he was funny! lol.

And the legend that is Jon Tickle.

Also I really liked Sissy but she was evicted early on!

[Princess]

Rachel,what exactly did she do? She sat on the fence and was sooooooooooo boring.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by Rory

Brian Belo by far. Stupidity was rewarded in 2007.

Like in three quarters of Endemol's other choice of contestants?

Brian may be stupid in an intellectualist snobs view, but he is smart about life, love and laughter. And having a bloody good time. And not to get corny, but that matters more on Big Brother.

I don't watch it to be educated. In fact, even the mention of Brian Belo proves he is not the worst winner ever because at least he provoked some sort of reaction.

Rachel? Lovely girl. What else? Umm...

[InOne]

I think Anthony, he was pretty dull, just your typical boring lad type. And Sophie, just played to the camera, and made it painful to watch when she was around Rodrigo.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by InOne

I think Anthony, he was pretty dull, just your typical boring lad type. And Sophie, just played to the camera, and made it painful to watch when she was around Rodrigo.

In fairness, they all play to the camera. Subconsciously or not. That's what makes the show what it is. I never get those arguments. That and the 'attention seeking' argument.

They auditioned to go on a national television show for three months in a house full of cameras?

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Stu

Like in three quarters of Endemol's other choice of contestants?

Brian may be stupid in an intellectualist snobs view, but he is smart about life, love and laughter. And having a bloody good time. And not to get corny, but that matters more on Big Brother.

I don't watch it to be educated. In fact, even the mention of Brian Belo proves he is not the worst winner ever because at least he provoked some sort of reaction.

Rachel? Lovely girl. What else? Umm...

Yeah I liked Brian Belo. He was a great entertaining housemate, whether he was being himself or not but I think he was being himself. I mean when you are in there for most people you will always be a bit wary of the cameras. I did think Brian is clever too, when he gave his views about big brother and was very sincere to other peoples feelings!

Rachel had a few entertaining moments, I must admit I wanted Mikey to win that year but I think Rachel is a nice decent girl and is the one who has stayed the most grounded and has not got the fame wrapped in her head!

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by InOne

I think Anthony, he was pretty dull, just your typical boring lad type. And Sophie, just played to the camera, and made it painful to watch when she was around Rodrigo.

Yeah Anthony was dull, Craig made him more interesting with that gay storyline, without Craig smothering him, no one would have noticed Anthony. Well he did have a few snogs with the HMs here and there!

I thought Sophie played up to the camera with Kris and they both knew it was a fake romance from the start and they were both in it purely for fame. I did think Sophie's relationship with Rodders is genuine though?

[InOne]

Originally Posted by Stu

In fairness, they all play to the camera. Subconsciously or not. That's what makes the show what it is. I never get those arguments. That and the 'attention seeking' argument.

They auditioned to go on a national television show for three months in a house full of cameras?

It's not an argument. But you must admit, some do milk it alot more than others?

[danda012]

Originally Posted by Rory

Brian Belo by far. Stupidity was rewarded in 2007.

The worst part about Brian Belo is whereas most winners fade out and vanish after a few weeks, we had to put up with him EVERY BLOODY WEEK on Big Mouth. His dancing on that show was kinda funny at first but after a few weeks it just got annoying.

[InOne]

Originally Posted by thebeast

Yeah Anthony was dull, Craig made him more interesting with that gay storyline, without Craig smothering him, no one would have noticed Anthony. Well he did have a few snogs with the HMs here and there!

I thought Sophie played up to the camera with Kris and they both knew it was a fake romance from the start and they were both in it purely for fame. I did think Sophie's relationship with Rodders is genuine though?

Might have been genuine, but when they both laughed like idiots, was pretty hard to watch. And some of the stuff they came out with!!!

[Stu]

Originally Posted by InOne

It's not an argument. But you must admit, some do milk it alot more than others?

True, but that's obvious. All depends on the person and there style & personality, so to speak.

[InOne]

Originally Posted by Stu

True, but that's obvious. All depends on the person and there style & personality, so to speak.

Either Sophie was very clever or very genuine in my opinion. She sort of had the whole BB story with the romance, and acting the tomboy. Then the whole magazine thing. Not sure if people felt sorry for her but it must have done something. Then the adorable pair thing with Rodrigo. I think she had very kind edits.

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by InOne

Either Sophie was very clever or very genuine in my opinion. She sort of had the whole BB story with the romance, and acting the tomboy. Then the whole magazine thing. Not sure if people felt sorry for her but it must have done something. Then the adorable pair thing with Rodrigo. I think she had very kind edits.

yeah and we had the most rubbish final in bb10. Legends like Freddie, Marcus and Angel should have been in the final. BB10 had really amazing housemates like them 3 and pretty much the rest were totally rubbish.