[Kerry]

I want more fun. The tree in Celeb BB was a masterstroke. Lets have more of the same and then some...

[Jamie.....]

Originally Posted by Jordannn!

Want - Entertainment, Bitching, Fun tasks, Awesome house, Great ratings.
Dont Want - Boring Hm's, Fakes, Boring house/tasks/twists, Butch Skinhead women.

Lol made me laugh, but i agree no more boring people who just sit there smoking and drinking tea.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Lucy.

I want to see -

Fun tasks instead of the predictable ones that BB seem to have got themselves into the last few series.
Housemates who can create entertainment that doesn't centre around arguements and alcohol.
A more exciting house, they've got worse and worse!

I don't want to see -

Egotistical housemates who think the definition of fun is getting naked and arguing with eachother.
A silly BB diary room chair, they need to get one that's more exciting for once!
Anymore dolly birds who have little else to offer.

I don't want to see wannabee, attention-seeking, untalented, completely deluded idiots - just some normal, intelligent people from different backgrounds, cultures etc and see how they all get on!

[President]

I want to see more housemates like the CBB7 lot who were more down to earth and had a laugh. The odd freak and wannabe is okay but I don't want all of them to be like that.

No messing around with nominations. Keep it simple every week and actually show all of the nominations instead of missing people out. Have a clear rule about nominations talk and don't keep changing it. So for example, everytime someone breaks the rule then they get a strike and are banned from nominating that week. Also if they get three strikes, they're removed from the house.

LESS dancing tasks. They get boring after about a couple and I don't want to see them every week like last year!

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by President

I want to see more housemates like the CBB7 lot who were more down to earth and had a laugh. The odd freak and wannabe is okay but I don't want all of them to be like that.

No messing around with nominations. Keep it simple every week and actually show all of the nominations instead of missing people out. Have a clear rule about nominations talk and don't keep changing it. So for example, everytime someone breaks the rule then they get a strike and are banned from nominating that week. Also if they get three strikes, they're removed from the house.

LESS dancing tasks. They get boring after about a couple and I don't want to see them every week like last year!

They have got to do a musical chair task though.. lol

[IheartBB]

Normal housemates, with only a few eccentrics. Too many wannabes/freaks is just cringworthy TV.

Good looking people too...

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by President

I want to see more housemates like the CBB7 lot who were more down to earth and had a laugh. The odd freak and wannabe is okay but I don't want all of them to be like that.

No messing around with nominations. Keep it simple every week and actually show all of the nominations instead of missing people out. Have a clear rule about nominations talk and don't keep changing it. So for example, everytime someone breaks the rule then they get a strike and are banned from nominating that week. Also if they get three strikes, they're removed from the house.

LESS dancing tasks. They get boring after about a couple and I don't want to see them every week like last year!

and

Normal housemates, with only a few eccentrics. Too many wannabes/freaks is just cringworthy TV.

Strongly agree with those.
Sure, I DO want to see unique and even eccentric personalities but the most fascinating ones are found in seemingly normal 'everyday people' and part of the intrigue of the BB psychological experiment was seeing 'seemingly ordinary' personalities show true and deeper and often very complicated traits exposed as we went along.
Instead, BB erred the other way:
Outrageously superficial put-ons or attention-seekers with 'eccentric' acts but after the launch-night festivities are over we get dullards and vacuous characters.
I do understand BB wants to appeal to their demographic and so sure enough there will be some superficial types,
but,
why don't they split the difference a little and put in maybe 6 or 8 stupid wannabe-models or outrageously dressed club-hoppers or shock-artist types,
but,
give us as many grown-ups who have deeper personalities and character from years of life-experience, heartache, success and failure.
I realize this sometimes requires people over the age of 30 but so be it.

Another thing I WISH I would see happen is absolutely certain rules on nominations and evictions.
Remove ANY possibility or even 'appearance' of manipulating the show to a designated winner by absolute rules.
Anyone.
Whether they are 'strict rules' or not - make them 100% applicable to every HM across the board with no exceptions.
Even if a ruling might short the producers favourite HM and risk losing them. Apply it even to all as it happens.

And yes I could easily go without dancing tasks. Yes I do understand there is some psychological/sociological reasons for these,
but,
maybe something a little better can be thought out here. For some reason they seem to get comments on message boards like "Didn't ___ look so funny dressed as a ___ in the dancing task',
yet,
I just don't believe anyone really likes these. Its more like commenting on a funny advert until the program gets back on again.
Nobody is 'watching' for the marathon dance tasks are they?

But again.. of course everyone is going to say 'We want MORE interesting people!',
but,
what do we mean by that? I think LESS show-offs and superficial people with contrived personalities = the more TRULY interesting people.

[ILoveTRW]

i want hot people
no fatties and no girls with less than a d cup

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by ILoveTRW

i want hot people
no fatties and no girls with less than a d cup

Yes, because there isn't already 734 programs showing 10 times more big-boobed hotties than BB can,
and,
its not like there isn't 17 million internet pages featuring nothing but with thousands of hours of videos.

So sure.. lets hope BB just does that for x-hours a day too. Then you will FINALLY get some satisfaction!

[LaLaLand]

10/12 people who each have one person that relate to them and one person that is the extreme opposite in with them.

That's why BB5 was so epic i.e. Marco/Ahmed/Dan = homosexual/homophobic/homosexual homophobic.

OH & more slags who hate other slags please

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by Jonnii

10/12 people who each have one person that relate to them and one person that is the extreme opposite in with them.

That's why BB5 was so epic i.e. Marco/Ahmed/Dan = homosexual/homophobic/homosexual homophobic.

OH & more slags who hate other slags please

Such a great point and the real magic is that 'connecting' person that engages them.
One of the best BBUSA seasons featured a still infamous duo of the 'hard right conservative catholic' Kent and the ultra-left flaming homosexual Bunky,
but,
the real key to the whole thing was the mutual friends who made it necessary for them to interact,
and,
They confronted each other, Kent saying Bunky was a sexual pervert and Bunky cried and called him judgmental,
but,
they became best friends and probably one of THE funniest and most entertaining duos in the history of that series.

What I don't want to see is 18 hip urban bisexual socially liberal and outrageous left-leaning multicultural loving agnostics with just 2 'moderates' thrown in.
I think you are pointing to the magic combination - give us 8 at that end - 8 at the other end - 8 who are those type bouncing around engaging anyone.

Also slags who hate other slags. Because it just won't be Big Brother if there is not at least 4 slag battles with at least one earning some kind of eventual disqualification or at least a dozen serious warnings.

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

and


Strongly agree with those.
Sure, I DO want to see unique and even eccentric personalities but the most fascinating ones are found in seemingly normal 'everyday people' and part of the intrigue of the BB psychological experiment was seeing 'seemingly ordinary' personalities show true and deeper and often very complicated traits exposed as we went along.
Instead, BB erred the other way:
Outrageously superficial put-ons or attention-seekers with 'eccentric' acts but after the launch-night festivities are over we get dullards and vacuous characters.
I do understand BB wants to appeal to their demographic and so sure enough there will be some superficial types,
but,
why don't they split the difference a little and put in maybe 6 or 8 stupid wannabe-models or outrageously dressed club-hoppers or shock-artist types,
but,
give us as many grown-ups who have deeper personalities and character from years of life-experience, heartache, success and failure.
I realize this sometimes requires people over the age of 30 but so be it.

Another thing I WISH I would see happen is absolutely certain rules on nominations and evictions.
Remove ANY possibility or even 'appearance' of manipulating the show to a designated winner by absolute rules.
Anyone.
Whether they are 'strict rules' or not - make them 100% applicable to every HM across the board with no exceptions.
Even if a ruling might short the producers favourite HM and risk losing them. Apply it even to all as it happens.

And yes I could easily go without dancing tasks. Yes I do understand there is some psychological/sociological reasons for these,
but,
maybe something a little better can be thought out here. For some reason they seem to get comments on message boards like "Didn't ___ look so funny dressed as a ___ in the dancing task',
yet,
I just don't believe anyone really likes these. Its more like commenting on a funny advert until the program gets back on again.
Nobody is 'watching' for the marathon dance tasks are they?

But again.. of course everyone is going to say 'We want MORE interesting people!',
but,
what do we mean by that? I think LESS show-offs and superficial people with contrived personalities = the more TRULY interesting people.

Wow I enjoyed reading this.. now then.. what shall I add to it? lol

Anyway yes.. I agree that I would LOVE to see more older housemates in the BB house.. in their 30's 40's and 50's..
Yeah bb10 they tried too hard putting in the explicitly fame hungry people and "eccentrics" when most turned out to be as dull as dishwater. I really liked Freddie though.. he was like superficial.. but he was very honest with all his opinions with everyone.. when most others were up Lisa's bum hole, laying under the radar to get to the final..
Anyway yeah we need interesting people.. but it is like.. it can't be hard for BB surely to make an interesting, amazing 1 hour highlight show out of 24 hours? Also yeah I would like to see ordinary people in a way.. funny, down to earth people who are gameplayers... and people who just say what they think! Well minus any racism!! lol

Anywho bb5 and bb6 had the most entertaining housemates!! everyone contributed! so we need a lot of normal people or whoever who.. "know themselves" lol

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by ILoveTRW

i want hot people
no fatties and no girls with less than a d cup

Yessssssssssssss! I can just get into BB

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Yes, because there isn't already 734 programs showing 10 times more big-boobed hotties than BB can,
and,
its not like there isn't 17 million internet pages featuring nothing but with thousands of hours of videos.

So sure.. lets hope BB just does that for x-hours a day too. Then you will FINALLY get some satisfaction!

Yeah.. for god sake.. if people want porn.. there is porn on the net! A lot of people take the mess out of BB.. because well.. I remember Jack Dee once quoted.. "When a housemate has an IQ at the same level as a dog" or something like that "Then it is about time to let go".

So in other words.. from bb8 especially.. they have let a lot of stupid people in.. especially with Brian Belo's "Who's Shakespeare" quote..
We need people with at least average intelligence.. and who likes to talk and debate about a whole spectrum of subjects.. someone like Derek from bb6.. get a funny "Jack the lad" type of lad like Maxwell.. and.. so on!

[Vicky.]

No messing with nominations to save the producers faves. If people break the rules, punish them in ways other than to 'put everyone they dislike up for eviction'

No more boring dolly girl/pretty boy types who offer nothing buy eye candy.

Less interfering by BB. This includes during fights/arguments. People fight all the time in real life, its not going to shock the audience too much to see someone punch someone else is it? And offcom...well who cares. What will they do? Last show and all.

I will think of more, these are off the top of my head..

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

No messing with nominations to save the producers faves. If people break the rules, punish them in ways other than to 'put everyone they dislike up for eviction'

No more boring dolly girl/pretty boy types who offer nothing buy eye candy.

Less interfering by BB. This includes during fights/arguments. People fight all the time in real life, its not going to shock the audience too much to see someone punch someone else is it? And offcom...well who cares. What will they do? Last show and all.

I will think of more, these are off the top of my head..

Short and sweet desciption Vicky

Anyway the producers really need to put in people with the "personality". Im sorry.. but it is actually harder to find people with great personalities for BB.. the "Looks" part is easy..

And yeah I agree with less interfering from BB! I think they should just call in someone.. if say.. they have actually witnessed something physical first.. on the housemates contract it should should say something like.. "Do you agree not to be molly cuddled when an argument starts" lol.

Argh I HATE Ofcom.. maybe before BB starts they should say.. don't watch this.. if you are going to complain to OFCOM.. lol. God so many party poopers!!