Quote:
Originally Posted by SoBig
Lets get this straight, Troy. No one takes Russell to the end, he takes them to the end. Everyone who got to the final 4 in Survivor, got there because Russell wanted them there. Not the other way around. Everyone who was evicted, was evicted, because Russell wanted them evicted. He had total control of the game. He only fell off a bit towards the end in Heroes Vs Villains when Parvarti came on strong. But from Start to finish he played the best overall game.
This is one of the best moments ever in Survivor history, Russell Vs Boston Rob and Crew. Boston Rob, didn't realise who the Fu******* he was messing with. The crazy thing is, Russell had SEVERAL plays just like that. Dude was just too dominant.
|
Okay, lemme correct myself then
Russell takes the people he takes to the end because they're smart enough to make him think he can beat them in a Jury vote. Reality is, Natalie and Sandra knew the whole time they wanted to go against Russell, because the win becomes that much easier. They saw through him right away to be an arrogant, cocky douchebag that everyone would hate and knew that they wanted to get to the end with him. So they downplayed themselves, saying that they would NEVER win a Jury vote, telling Russell that he's the best player and he deserves to win, just puffing up his ego. He's the one who fell for it and that's why he lost. So Russell may have "taken" the people who he wanted to the end, but it was those people who were taken that played him. And it doesn't matter how many votes Russell controlled or didn't control, because the decisions he made were stupid. If he really deserved to win, he would've done things differently and would have won. He fairly lost, he deserved to lose, get over it.
24-08-2010, 10:45 AM
Hybrid Mode
