[Jack_]

A few factors come into this:

#1 - How they're related to the woman. If it's a randomer, then I can understand why some would want to make the decision to use the dynamite.

#2 - How willing the people are to go through with it, i.e if they're the type that just look out for themselves, or if they're the opposite.

#3 - The woman herself - and whether she's willing to sacrifice herself or not.

#4 - How long the group has been together, i.e if they've shared a long experience/come to befriend each other etc.

Personally, if I was related to them at all, I would be against the idea. The only thing that may persuade me otherwise is if the woman herself agreed to the idea. If it were a randomer, that I had not known long, then things may be different. Then again, I don't like the idea of killing anyone, let alone a pregnant woman - thus killing two lives. So again, it would probably be put down to the woman herself and the general consensus of the people I was with.

Also, if I had spent a long time with these people, I would probably think 'well, we've all been through this together - so we've got to end it together'. Then again, killing one person and saving many sounds a lot better than killing them all. I also assume being blown up would be a lot quicker/less painful/torturing than drowning. But I'm not too sure, so feel free to correct me on that one.

Tough question, one of which I will probably never be able to conclusively answer. But right now I'd probably say no to using the dynamite.