About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Stu · 18-01-2011, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by happyland

Hmm.. Stu was this just another conversation starting thread? Or are you going to tell us?!

I thought it was obvious that I was pointing out the sheer overkill of the questions thread?

Lee. · 18-01-2011, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu

I thought it was obvious that I was pointing out the sheer overkill of the questions thread?

Yeah, yeah.. well to me it was, not so sure about everybody!

But are you actually going to declare a meme or whatever it is called dead, or is this one of your artistic threads?

Shaun · 18-01-2011, 08:45 PM

*giggles at the point flying over happyland's head*

he means question threads in themselves are dead

Lee. · 18-01-2011, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

*giggles at the point flying over happyland's head*

he means question threads in themselves are dead

*giggles at myself for not having a clue what anybody's talking about anymore*

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by happyland

Yeah, yeah.. well to me it was, not so sure about everybody!

But are you actually going to declare a meme or whatever it is called dead, or is this one of your artistic threads?

I think you'll find it's what Stu considers ongoing performance art/social experimentation in his mind - who cares - it didn't have that effect. Here has been lively today with everybody giving daft answers or going off in tangents like your Crocs obsession!!!!

And Hawkward should be bannedo!

Shaun · 18-01-2011, 09:08 PM

oh yeah congrats on this art Stu, I know you've been worried about your performance but you really convinced me into believing this was just a bit of fun and not just fuel for Claymores' angry old drunken vendettas.

Bravo! Encore!

Lee. · 18-01-2011, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores

I think you'll find it's what Stu considers ongoing performance art/social experimentation in his mind - who cares - it didn't have that effect. Here has been lively today with everybody giving daft answers or going off in tangents like your Crocs obsession!!!!

And Hawkward should be bannedo!

So should crocs!

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

oh yeah congrats on this art Stu, I know you've been worried about your performance but you really convinced me into believing this was just a bit of fun and not just fuel for Claymores' angry old drunken vendettas.

Bravo! Encore!

Do you get to go backstage to the 'afters' party as his No1 fan?

Shaun · 18-01-2011, 09:46 PM

Yes. And once a month I get a photo and a newsletter!

Iceman · 18-01-2011, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

Yes. And once a month I get a photo and a newsletter!

Don't forget the keyring!

Stu · 18-01-2011, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores

I think you'll find it's what Stu considers ongoing performance art/social experimentation in his mind - who cares - it didn't have that effect. Here has been lively today with everybody giving daft answers or going off in tangents like your Crocs obsession!!!!

And Hawkward should be bannedo!

What effect? I never said it was going to have any effect. You took the performance art bit serious? You think I was ... performing a piece of performance art?

Okay then.

Have an Alka Seltzer ya daft prat.

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu

What effect? I never said it was going to have any effect. You took the performance art bit serious? You think I was ... performing a piece of performance art?

Okay then.

Have an Alka Seltzer ya daft prat.

Nope - I thought you were trying to make a point which didn't need made on a quiet site.

The point (whatever your initial motivation to go off on one was) didn't get the expected result. Your daft random questions just stirred the place into daft random answers which then went all over the place and became entertaining.

But as our social scientist of the week you will no doubt have taken the notes for your thesis. Explain it to me like I'm a 5 year old

Stu · 18-01-2011, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores

Nope - I thought you were trying to make a point which didn't need made on a quiet site.

The point (whatever your initial motivation to go off on one was) didn't get the expected result. Your daft random questions just stirred the place into daft random answers which then went all over the place and became entertaining.

But as our social scientist of the week you will no doubt have taken the notes for your thesis. Explain it to me like I'm a 5 year old

There was no expected results. I never said 'HERE IS WHAT I'M DOING AND HERE IS WHAT I HOPE WILL HAPPEN!'. You are the only one suggesting that. So I don't get where you are going with this 'haha you failed *hic* !' stuff.

Are you following so far? I'm not going to get any PM's threatening physical abuse are my? If you are going to pass out do shift to the side. Wouldn't want such a fine specimen choking on it's own vomit.

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 10:28 PM

I see - the site users made an ass of your thesis about question threads being dull, so now you're dropping to abuse.........can I be social scientist of the week next week?

Stu · 18-01-2011, 10:32 PM

I never commented either way on question threads being dumb. I wasn't playing up to them being dumb. I was playing up to the huge frequency of them that get made in a very short space of time every now and then. Again you seem to be making this up as you go along.

And what for members responding to the threads? Of course they did. The threads were purposefully riddiculous in nature - I made them that way - and would thus obviously garner replies. Half a dozen threads made in 60 seconds by me would not just sink to the bottom of the forum unnoticed. That changes nothing.

I'm flattered you think I have a thesis but I don't. You're right about the fanclub though.

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu

There was no expected results. I never said 'HERE IS WHAT I'M DOING AND HERE IS WHAT I HOPE WILL HAPPEN!'.

Dear god man - you wouldn't or it invalidates the results. Please please please don't ever apply for a job as a social researcher or ever bother thying a psychology course FGS

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu

I'm flattered you think I have a thesis but I don't. You're right about the fanclub though.

I luvs the fanclubs - Novo has his special friend and so do you - super

Z · 18-01-2011, 10:35 PM

I think I'm the only person who seemed to understand you were saying the question threads were the dead meme, LOL.

Scarlett. · 18-01-2011, 10:37 PM

i 2 sxi

Claymores · 18-01-2011, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu

I never commented either way on question threads being dumb. I wasn't playing up to them being dumb. I was playing up to the huge frequency of them that get made in a very short space of time every now and then. Again you seem to be making this up as you go along.

And what for members responding to the threads? Of course they did. The threads were purposefully riddiculous in nature - I made them that way - and would thus obviously garner replies. Half a dozen threads made in 60 seconds by me would not just sink to the bottom of the forum unnoticed. That changes nothing.

I'm flattered you think I have a thesis but I don't. You're right about the fanclub though.

I note you subtely changed my original word "dull" to "dumb". So what exactly did you set out to prove by the multiple spam questions?