[Callum]

The US has warned of a "specific, credible threat" ahead of the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, possibly in New York or Washington DC.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the threat was "uncorroborated", but security would be boosted at bridges, tunnels and on public transport.

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said spot checks in the New York subway would be more frequent in coming days.

President Barack Obama called on the US to "redouble" anti-terror efforts.

The authorities say intelligence gathered in Pakistan points to possible car or truck bomb attacks at strategic points in New York or Washington.

US TV network ABC News reports that three individuals - one a US citizen - entered the US in August aiming to carry out a terror attack. It was unclear whether this information was linked to the threat detailed by US officials.

A service marking the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in which almost 3,000 people died will be held on the site of the World Trade Center on Sunday.

President Barack Obama and former President George W Bush will attend the ceremony.

White House officials said Mr Obama, who spoke to Congress about a jobs plan on Thursday night, was briefed on the threat earlier in the day.


Speaking at a news conference alongside Mr Bloomberg and Mr Kelly, the FBI Assistant Director in Charge of the New York office, Janice Fedarcyk, confirmed the threat.

"Al-Qaeda has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries. In this instance it is accurate that there is credible, specific but unconfirmed information," she said.

An anonymous counter-terrorism official told the Associated Press that authorities had been investigating the intelligence since it was received late on Wednesday.

Mr Bloomberg told reporters that New York police would be "deploying additional resources... some of which you will notice and some of which you will not".

These measures could include checking bags and additional security personnel on public transport.

The UK Foreign Office warned Britons in the US to remain vigilant, warning that an attack could happen "in places frequented by expatriates and foreign travellers".

In the days leading up to the anniversary Mr Kelly told the BBC he had concerns about a new threat.

"We are worried specifically about something happening on the anniversary of 9/11 because we saw on some of Bin Laden's materials that there was discussion about the 10-year anniversary, the 10-year memorial," he said.

"There is no doubt that New York is safer now than it was 10 years ago, but there are no guarantees. We are doing everything that I believe we can do to protect the city, but it is a dangerous world."

Officials said that documents seized during the raid of Osama bin Laden's compound on 2 May 2011 in Abbottabad, Pakistan, showed the al-Qaeda leader was considering strikes to coincide with the anniversary.

BBC News

[arista]

Yes they are thinking the 3 are armed in Car or truck.



Ref: CNN, SkyNewsHD, France24, RTNews, FoxNews

[Grimnir]

imagine if there was a huge nuclear attack and instead of 3,000 deaths it was 3,000,000 or 30,000,000
imagine the response from american public and american government
what would they react like?
the rolling news coverage would be insane

[arista]

Originally Posted by Grimnir

imagine if there was a huge nuclear attack and instead of 3,000 deaths it was 3,000,000 or 30,000,000
imagine the response from american public and american government
what would they react like?
the rolling news coverage would be insane

If a Nuke in Washington DC goes off
they will be No President.


And those that set it off leave no trace.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by arista

If a Nuke in Washington DC goes off
they will be No President.


And those that set it off leave no trace.

Only for a few minutes, the Vice President immediately assumes the executive powers and is sworn in as President as soon as possible.

If he is also targeted and incapacitated then there is a set procedure used to see who becomes President, this is covered by the 25th Amendment to the Constitution.

As is the procedure if the President goes a bit loopy

There will always be a trail of evidence even after a nuke, even down to the residual isotopes left by the explosions will identify the original fissionable material and its point of origin

[arista]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Only for a few minutes, the Vice President immediately assumes the executive powers and is sworn in as President as soon as possible.

If he is also targeted and incapacitated then there is a set procedure used to see who becomes President, this is covered by the 25th Amendment to the Constitution.

As is the procedure if the President goes a bit loopy

There will always be a trail of evidence even after a nuke, even down to the residual isotopes left by the explosions will identify the original fissionable material and its point of origin

Well the Saudi Terror Gang bought it from North Korea
via a China border dealer
but North Korea or China is not backing it's use on yanks

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by arista

Well the Saudi Terror Gang bought it from North Korea via a China border
but North Korea is not backing it's use on yanks

If a dirty bomb or an atomic weapon was used on the US, they would regard as whoever supplied their attackers just as culpable as the attackers themselves.

North Korea selling radioactive materials to a Saudi Terror Gang, knowing where it would probably be used, means buckets of instant sunshine falling on North Korea. In the eyes of the Yanks its an attack on them by proxy. (Evidenced by the probable cause of the Pam Am 103, Operation Eldorado Canyon as payback for the Berlin Diisco bombing)

[arista]

Originally Posted by Shasown

If a dirty bomb or an atomic weapon was used on the US, they would regard as whoever supplied their attackers just as culpable as the attackers themselves.

North Korea selling radioactive materials to a Saudi Terror Gang, knowing where it would probably be used, means buckets of instant sunshine falling on North Korea. In the eyes of the Yanks its an attack on them by proxy. (Evidenced by the probable cause of the Pam Am 103, Operation Eldorado Canyon as payback for the Berlin Diisco bombing)

No as China would say No.
As it effects them


You wanna Fight China?

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by arista

No as China would say No.
As it effects them


You wanna Fight China?

Me I dont want to fight anyone, I love everyone. The US Administration dont follow my beliefs. Especially after attacks on Uncle Sam.

However China would remain quiet on the issue, under international law its an unprovoked attack on a key member of the UN Security Council, one of China's major economic allies. Losing the goodwill of the US and the majority of the UN would hurt China more than losing their North Korean neighbours.

They might complain a little, but would do no more than complain and criticise.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by arista

If a Nuke in Washington DC goes off
they will be No President.


And those that set it off leave no trace.

Well this article says that Obama is going to be in New York... so yes, there still would be a president...

[arista]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Well this article says that Obama is going to be in New York... so yes, there still would be a president...

They may change it to NYC
if they also want the Killer of Pakistan People
he uses USA Drome Dombs on them. (thats Barack)